‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century

In the following article, based partly on the excellent work of Dr David Fig, South Africa’s energy policy is examined from the euphoria of the Reconstruction and Development Plan (RDP) to the nadir of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA). We further review the suc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mike Kantey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Johannesburg 2024-10-01
Series:The Thinker
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/3525
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583679119982592
author Mike Kantey
author_facet Mike Kantey
author_sort Mike Kantey
collection DOAJ
description In the following article, based partly on the excellent work of Dr David Fig, South Africa’s energy policy is examined from the euphoria of the Reconstruction and Development Plan (RDP) to the nadir of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA). We further review the successive infiltration by the global nuclear industry from the German Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) through the French company AREVA to the advent of the Russian VVER. Evidence of the decisive role played by Eskom is presented, while we show how energy policy became implacably skewed in favour of nuclear power by means of a ‘policy-adjusted’ IRP2010, which became the unchallenged justification for the nuclear fleet. While much has been made of ‘State Capture’ and the alliance between the South African Presidency and the Gupta family through Oakbay Resources’ interest in uranium1, we will not include it here because it has been so well rehearsed in other publications. What we consider far more important to grasp is that ‘State Capture’ is not an entirely new phenomenon since what we call the ‘Putsch of Polokwane’ in 2007. From the time of General Jan Smuts to PW Botha, from Mandela to Zuma, the insidious relationship among international arms dealers, globe-trotting Mafiosi, and beneficiaries of the military-industrial global nexus, has remained a constant refrain: only names and places have been changed. As we see, parliamentary democracy is a very fragile bird, and it remains to pay tribute to a very rare, courageous, and determined South African civil society that can hold their elected leaders to account.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3fa3509c1f1464593534d16ac358a25
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-2458
2616-907X
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher University of Johannesburg
record_format Article
series The Thinker
spelling doaj-art-d3fa3509c1f1464593534d16ac358a252025-01-28T09:01:34ZengUniversity of JohannesburgThe Thinker2075-24582616-907X2024-10-01100310.36615/w4mmc762‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st CenturyMike Kantey0Watermark Press In the following article, based partly on the excellent work of Dr David Fig, South Africa’s energy policy is examined from the euphoria of the Reconstruction and Development Plan (RDP) to the nadir of the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA). We further review the successive infiltration by the global nuclear industry from the German Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) through the French company AREVA to the advent of the Russian VVER. Evidence of the decisive role played by Eskom is presented, while we show how energy policy became implacably skewed in favour of nuclear power by means of a ‘policy-adjusted’ IRP2010, which became the unchallenged justification for the nuclear fleet. While much has been made of ‘State Capture’ and the alliance between the South African Presidency and the Gupta family through Oakbay Resources’ interest in uranium1, we will not include it here because it has been so well rehearsed in other publications. What we consider far more important to grasp is that ‘State Capture’ is not an entirely new phenomenon since what we call the ‘Putsch of Polokwane’ in 2007. From the time of General Jan Smuts to PW Botha, from Mandela to Zuma, the insidious relationship among international arms dealers, globe-trotting Mafiosi, and beneficiaries of the military-industrial global nexus, has remained a constant refrain: only names and places have been changed. As we see, parliamentary democracy is a very fragile bird, and it remains to pay tribute to a very rare, courageous, and determined South African civil society that can hold their elected leaders to account. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/3525Fission ChipsActivistSouth AfricaAnti-Nuclear Activism
spellingShingle Mike Kantey
‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
The Thinker
Fission Chips
Activist
South Africa
Anti-Nuclear Activism
title ‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
title_full ‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
title_fullStr ‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed ‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
title_short ‘Fission Chips’: An Activist’s View on Anti-Nuclear Activism in South Africa from the 1980s to the 21st Century
title_sort fission chips an activist s view on anti nuclear activism in south africa from the 1980s to the 21st century
topic Fission Chips
Activist
South Africa
Anti-Nuclear Activism
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/The_Thinker/article/view/3525
work_keys_str_mv AT mikekantey fissionchipsanactivistsviewonantinuclearactivisminsouthafricafromthe1980stothe21stcentury