PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up

Purpose. To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease using PEEK cages or PMMA spacers with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Methods. Anterior cervical discectomy was performed in 107 patients in one or two levels usi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jan-Helge Klingler, Marie T. Krüger, Ronen Sircar, Evangelos Kogias, Christoph Scholz, Florian Volz, Christian Scheiwe, Ulrich Hubbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/398396
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554925564887040
author Jan-Helge Klingler
Marie T. Krüger
Ronen Sircar
Evangelos Kogias
Christoph Scholz
Florian Volz
Christian Scheiwe
Ulrich Hubbe
author_facet Jan-Helge Klingler
Marie T. Krüger
Ronen Sircar
Evangelos Kogias
Christoph Scholz
Florian Volz
Christian Scheiwe
Ulrich Hubbe
author_sort Jan-Helge Klingler
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease using PEEK cages or PMMA spacers with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Methods. Anterior cervical discectomy was performed in 107 patients in one or two levels using empty PEEK cages (51 levels), Sulcem PMMA spacers (49 levels) or Palacos PMMA spacers (41 levels) between January, 2005 and February, 2009. Bony fusion, subsidence, and sagittal alignment were retrospectively assessed in CT scans and radiographs at follow-up. Clinical outcome was measured using the VAS, NDI, and SF-36. Results. Bony fusion was assessed in 65% (PEEK cage), 57% (Sulcem), and 46% (Palacos) after a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Mean subsidence was 2.3–2.6 mm without significant differences between the groups. The most pronounced loss of lordosis was found in PEEK cages (−4.1°). VAS was 3.1 (PEEK cage), 3.6 (Sulcem), and 2.7 (Palacos) without significant differences. Functional outcome in the PEEK cage and Palacos group was superior to the Sulcem group. Conclusions. The substitute groups showed differing fusion rates. Clinical outcome, however, appears to be generally not correlated with fusion status or subsidence. We could not specify a superior disc substitute for anterior cervical discectomy. This trial is registered with DRKS00003591.
format Article
id doaj-art-d3c4b509085b4977b89034c6d02e92ea
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-d3c4b509085b4977b89034c6d02e92ea2025-02-03T05:50:15ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/398396398396PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-UpJan-Helge Klingler0Marie T. Krüger1Ronen Sircar2Evangelos Kogias3Christoph Scholz4Florian Volz5Christian Scheiwe6Ulrich Hubbe7Department of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Freiburg University Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, GermanyPurpose. To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease using PEEK cages or PMMA spacers with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Methods. Anterior cervical discectomy was performed in 107 patients in one or two levels using empty PEEK cages (51 levels), Sulcem PMMA spacers (49 levels) or Palacos PMMA spacers (41 levels) between January, 2005 and February, 2009. Bony fusion, subsidence, and sagittal alignment were retrospectively assessed in CT scans and radiographs at follow-up. Clinical outcome was measured using the VAS, NDI, and SF-36. Results. Bony fusion was assessed in 65% (PEEK cage), 57% (Sulcem), and 46% (Palacos) after a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Mean subsidence was 2.3–2.6 mm without significant differences between the groups. The most pronounced loss of lordosis was found in PEEK cages (−4.1°). VAS was 3.1 (PEEK cage), 3.6 (Sulcem), and 2.7 (Palacos) without significant differences. Functional outcome in the PEEK cage and Palacos group was superior to the Sulcem group. Conclusions. The substitute groups showed differing fusion rates. Clinical outcome, however, appears to be generally not correlated with fusion status or subsidence. We could not specify a superior disc substitute for anterior cervical discectomy. This trial is registered with DRKS00003591.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/398396
spellingShingle Jan-Helge Klingler
Marie T. Krüger
Ronen Sircar
Evangelos Kogias
Christoph Scholz
Florian Volz
Christian Scheiwe
Ulrich Hubbe
PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
The Scientific World Journal
title PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
title_full PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
title_short PEEK Cages versus PMMA Spacers in Anterior Cervical Discectomy: Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, Sagittal Alignment, and Clinical Outcome with a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up
title_sort peek cages versus pmma spacers in anterior cervical discectomy comparison of fusion subsidence sagittal alignment and clinical outcome with a minimum 1 year follow up
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/398396
work_keys_str_mv AT janhelgeklingler peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT marietkruger peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT ronensircar peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT evangeloskogias peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT christophscholz peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT florianvolz peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT christianscheiwe peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup
AT ulrichhubbe peekcagesversuspmmaspacersinanteriorcervicaldiscectomycomparisonoffusionsubsidencesagittalalignmentandclinicaloutcomewithaminimum1yearfollowup