Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls
The Algerian Seismic Regulation of 1999, version 2003 (RPA99/v2003), presents ambiguities and a lack of thorough explanations in certain articles, which has led to a diversity of readings and interpretations among various stakeholders in the field, particularly the control offices. This situation h...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
2024-05-01
|
Series: | The Journal of Engineering and Exact Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.ufv.br/jcec/article/view/18672 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832569831290830848 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed Khelladi Smain Benyamina Salem Merabti |
author_facet | Mohamed Khelladi Smain Benyamina Salem Merabti |
author_sort | Mohamed Khelladi |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
The Algerian Seismic Regulation of 1999, version 2003 (RPA99/v2003), presents ambiguities and a lack of thorough explanations in certain articles, which has led to a diversity of readings and interpretations among various stakeholders in the field, particularly the control offices. This situation has caused significant disagreements, especially during the approval of civil engineering files, thus resulting in a negative impact on project progress. To ensure adequate seismic protection of civil engineering structures, this work aims to unify the interpretations of certain passages of the regulation, with a particular emphasis on verifying the fundamental period of the structure, the shear forces at the base, and inter-story displacements using seismic calculation methods prescribed by the RPA. The comparative study demonstrates that no correlation between the period determined by the equivalent static method and that calculated by the spectral modal analysis method has been observed. This justifies the conclusion that adjusting between the empirical period and the dynamic period is not necessary.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d3914bc8abf64cfb9c4df333215550ad |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2527-1075 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
record_format | Article |
series | The Journal of Engineering and Exact Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-d3914bc8abf64cfb9c4df333215550ad2025-02-02T19:53:41ZengUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)The Journal of Engineering and Exact Sciences2527-10752024-05-0110410.18540/jcecvl10iss4pp18672Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear WallsMohamed Khelladi0Smain Benyamina 1Salem Merabti2Université Dr Yahia Fares; Médéa, AlgérieAcoustics and Civil Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Khemis-Miliana, AlgeriaAcoustics and Civil Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Khemis-Miliana, Algeria The Algerian Seismic Regulation of 1999, version 2003 (RPA99/v2003), presents ambiguities and a lack of thorough explanations in certain articles, which has led to a diversity of readings and interpretations among various stakeholders in the field, particularly the control offices. This situation has caused significant disagreements, especially during the approval of civil engineering files, thus resulting in a negative impact on project progress. To ensure adequate seismic protection of civil engineering structures, this work aims to unify the interpretations of certain passages of the regulation, with a particular emphasis on verifying the fundamental period of the structure, the shear forces at the base, and inter-story displacements using seismic calculation methods prescribed by the RPA. The comparative study demonstrates that no correlation between the period determined by the equivalent static method and that calculated by the spectral modal analysis method has been observed. This justifies the conclusion that adjusting between the empirical period and the dynamic period is not necessary. https://periodicos.ufv.br/jcec/article/view/18672Reinforced concrete structuresL-shaped shear wallsPeriodsShear forcesDisplacements |
spellingShingle | Mohamed Khelladi Smain Benyamina Salem Merabti Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls The Journal of Engineering and Exact Sciences Reinforced concrete structures L-shaped shear walls Periods Shear forces Displacements |
title | Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls |
title_full | Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls |
title_fullStr | Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls |
title_short | Influence of Empirical and Dynamic Periods on the Seismic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Braced by L-Shaped Shear Walls |
title_sort | influence of empirical and dynamic periods on the seismic responses of reinforced concrete buildings braced by l shaped shear walls |
topic | Reinforced concrete structures L-shaped shear walls Periods Shear forces Displacements |
url | https://periodicos.ufv.br/jcec/article/view/18672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedkhelladi influenceofempiricalanddynamicperiodsontheseismicresponsesofreinforcedconcretebuildingsbracedbylshapedshearwalls AT smainbenyamina influenceofempiricalanddynamicperiodsontheseismicresponsesofreinforcedconcretebuildingsbracedbylshapedshearwalls AT salemmerabti influenceofempiricalanddynamicperiodsontheseismicresponsesofreinforcedconcretebuildingsbracedbylshapedshearwalls |