Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events

Abstract We investigate high-frequency traders’ behavior in the context of the fastest and most extreme price movements (EPMs) that can be observed in the market, specifically ultra-fast flash events, challenging the methodologies employed in the academic and practitioner literature for identifying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christophe Desagre, Floris Laly, Mikael Petitjean
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:Financial Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00726-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571407076163584
author Christophe Desagre
Floris Laly
Mikael Petitjean
author_facet Christophe Desagre
Floris Laly
Mikael Petitjean
author_sort Christophe Desagre
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We investigate high-frequency traders’ behavior in the context of the fastest and most extreme price movements (EPMs) that can be observed in the market, specifically ultra-fast flash events, challenging the methodologies employed in the academic and practitioner literature for identifying sudden liquidity black holes. To refine the price-shock identification methodology, we introduce a new approach called sequence-based flash events (SFEs), which relies on tick sequences instead of predetermined fixed-time intervals within which all flash events in the sample are assumed to occur. This alternative methodology offers the advantage of pinpointing the exact time and duration of a crash, which, in turn, provides a way to more accurately define the observation windows around it. We compare our sample of SFEs with both the so-called “mini flash crashes”, as identified by the Nanex detection algorithm, and the so-called EPMs, as identified by Brogaard et al. (2018). We use close and open prices, as well as high and low prices. Based on our sample of SFEs, we find no evidence that HFTs trigger extreme price shocks. However, we find that HFTs exacerbate SFEs by increasing the net imbalance in the direction of these shocks as they occur. Finally, we show that the choice of the price-shock identification methodology is critical. Thus, we urge regulators to exercise caution and avoid hasty conclusions regarding HFTs’ contribution to price stability in stressful market conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-d382d25a6ad14e72a84cf42ae42a552a
institution Kabale University
issn 2199-4730
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Financial Innovation
spelling doaj-art-d382d25a6ad14e72a84cf42ae42a552a2025-02-02T12:37:50ZengSpringerOpenFinancial Innovation2199-47302025-01-0111113710.1186/s40854-024-00726-zRevisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash eventsChristophe Desagre0Floris Laly1Mikael Petitjean2LFIN/LIDAM, UCLouvainLFIN/LIDAM, UCLouvainLFIN/LIDAM, UCLouvainAbstract We investigate high-frequency traders’ behavior in the context of the fastest and most extreme price movements (EPMs) that can be observed in the market, specifically ultra-fast flash events, challenging the methodologies employed in the academic and practitioner literature for identifying sudden liquidity black holes. To refine the price-shock identification methodology, we introduce a new approach called sequence-based flash events (SFEs), which relies on tick sequences instead of predetermined fixed-time intervals within which all flash events in the sample are assumed to occur. This alternative methodology offers the advantage of pinpointing the exact time and duration of a crash, which, in turn, provides a way to more accurately define the observation windows around it. We compare our sample of SFEs with both the so-called “mini flash crashes”, as identified by the Nanex detection algorithm, and the so-called EPMs, as identified by Brogaard et al. (2018). We use close and open prices, as well as high and low prices. Based on our sample of SFEs, we find no evidence that HFTs trigger extreme price shocks. However, we find that HFTs exacerbate SFEs by increasing the net imbalance in the direction of these shocks as they occur. Finally, we show that the choice of the price-shock identification methodology is critical. Thus, we urge regulators to exercise caution and avoid hasty conclusions regarding HFTs’ contribution to price stability in stressful market conditions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00726-zFlash eventsMini flash crashesExtreme price movementsHigh-frequency tradingTrading activityLiquidity
spellingShingle Christophe Desagre
Floris Laly
Mikael Petitjean
Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
Financial Innovation
Flash events
Mini flash crashes
Extreme price movements
High-frequency trading
Trading activity
Liquidity
title Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
title_full Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
title_fullStr Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
title_short Revisiting the trading activity of high-frequency trading firms around ultra-fast flash events
title_sort revisiting the trading activity of high frequency trading firms around ultra fast flash events
topic Flash events
Mini flash crashes
Extreme price movements
High-frequency trading
Trading activity
Liquidity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00726-z
work_keys_str_mv AT christophedesagre revisitingthetradingactivityofhighfrequencytradingfirmsaroundultrafastflashevents
AT florislaly revisitingthetradingactivityofhighfrequencytradingfirmsaroundultrafastflashevents
AT mikaelpetitjean revisitingthetradingactivityofhighfrequencytradingfirmsaroundultrafastflashevents