Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques
The aim of the “(in)tangible commons” special section is to refine the understanding of the intangible dimension of tangible commons and/or the tangible dimension of intangible commons, or even to show that this dichotomy is illusory. The research objects (urban area, water, land, cooperatives, seed...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Développement Durable et Territoires |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13701 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832095667982434304 |
|---|---|
| author | Arnaud Buchs Catherine Baron Géraldine Froger Adrien Peneranda |
| author_facet | Arnaud Buchs Catherine Baron Géraldine Froger Adrien Peneranda |
| author_sort | Arnaud Buchs |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the “(in)tangible commons” special section is to refine the understanding of the intangible dimension of tangible commons and/or the tangible dimension of intangible commons, or even to show that this dichotomy is illusory. The research objects (urban area, water, land, cooperatives, seeds, summer pastures) are analyzed thanks to various theoretical and conceptual corpora reflecting the diversity of the disciplines mobilized (economics, geography, planning, law, management, anthropology and political science). We have chosen to grasp the combination of the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through three perspectives, which are not exclusive of each other. The first, the epistemological perspective, emphasizes the inherent complexity of the commons and aims at questioning the a priori according to which a specific object considered as a commons could be tangible or intangible per se. The second perspective, institutional, combines the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through the issues of rules shaping, particularly those related to ownership, possession and access, but also through the linked coordination issues. The third perspective deals with the links between the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through the political issues at stake, regarding the commons as political projects. These three perspectives structure the articulation of articles within the special section. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d3826b1134804c1c89a1fc953abbaf80 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1772-9971 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Développement Durable et Territoires |
| spelling | doaj-art-d3826b1134804c1c89a1fc953abbaf802025-02-05T16:34:16ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99712020-07-011010.4000/developpementdurable.13701Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiquesArnaud BuchsCatherine BaronGéraldine FrogerAdrien PenerandaThe aim of the “(in)tangible commons” special section is to refine the understanding of the intangible dimension of tangible commons and/or the tangible dimension of intangible commons, or even to show that this dichotomy is illusory. The research objects (urban area, water, land, cooperatives, seeds, summer pastures) are analyzed thanks to various theoretical and conceptual corpora reflecting the diversity of the disciplines mobilized (economics, geography, planning, law, management, anthropology and political science). We have chosen to grasp the combination of the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through three perspectives, which are not exclusive of each other. The first, the epistemological perspective, emphasizes the inherent complexity of the commons and aims at questioning the a priori according to which a specific object considered as a commons could be tangible or intangible per se. The second perspective, institutional, combines the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through the issues of rules shaping, particularly those related to ownership, possession and access, but also through the linked coordination issues. The third perspective deals with the links between the tangible and intangible dimensions of the commons through the political issues at stake, regarding the commons as political projects. These three perspectives structure the articulation of articles within the special section.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13701collective actionpropertytangible commonsintangible commonsresourcescomplexity |
| spellingShingle | Arnaud Buchs Catherine Baron Géraldine Froger Adrien Peneranda Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques Développement Durable et Territoires collective action property tangible commons intangible commons resources complexity |
| title | Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques |
| title_full | Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques |
| title_fullStr | Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques |
| title_full_unstemmed | Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques |
| title_short | Communs (im)matériels : enjeux épistémologiques, institutionnels et politiques |
| title_sort | communs im materiels enjeux epistemologiques institutionnels et politiques |
| topic | collective action property tangible commons intangible commons resources complexity |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/13701 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arnaudbuchs communsimmaterielsenjeuxepistemologiquesinstitutionnelsetpolitiques AT catherinebaron communsimmaterielsenjeuxepistemologiquesinstitutionnelsetpolitiques AT geraldinefroger communsimmaterielsenjeuxepistemologiquesinstitutionnelsetpolitiques AT adrienpeneranda communsimmaterielsenjeuxepistemologiquesinstitutionnelsetpolitiques |