Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice

In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John’s, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark R. Borgaonkar, David Pace, Muna Lougheed, Curtis Marcoux, Bradley Evans, Nikita Hickey, Meghan O’Leary, Jerry McGrath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554388031275008
author Mark R. Borgaonkar
David Pace
Muna Lougheed
Curtis Marcoux
Bradley Evans
Nikita Hickey
Meghan O’Leary
Jerry McGrath
author_facet Mark R. Borgaonkar
David Pace
Muna Lougheed
Curtis Marcoux
Bradley Evans
Nikita Hickey
Meghan O’Leary
Jerry McGrath
author_sort Mark R. Borgaonkar
collection DOAJ
description In 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John’s, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included. Adverse events are as follows. Medication-related includes use of reversal agents 0.1%, hypoxia 9.9%, hypotension 15.4%, and hypertension 0.9%. No patients required CPR or experienced allergic reactions or laryngospasm/bronchospasm. The indicator, “sedation dosages in patients older than 70,” showed lower usage of fentanyl and midazolam in elderly patients. Procedure-related immediate includes perforation 0.2%, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding 0.3%, need for hospital admission or transfer to the emergency department 0.1%, and severe persistent abdominal pain proven not to be perforation 0.4%. Instrument impaction was not seen. Procedure-related delayed includes death within 14 days 0.1%, unplanned health care visit within 14 days of the colonoscopy 1.8%, unplanned hospitalization within 14 days of the colonoscopy 0.6%, bleeding within 14 days of colonoscopy 0.2%, infection 0.03%, and metabolic complication 0.03%. Conclusions. The most common adverse events were mild and sedation related. Rates of serious adverse events were in keeping with published reports.
format Article
id doaj-art-d35083d5598b41e9aaafa4f754536cd1
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-2789
2291-2797
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-d35083d5598b41e9aaafa4f754536cd12025-02-03T05:51:41ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27892291-27972016-01-01201610.1155/2016/27298712729871Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical PracticeMark R. Borgaonkar0David Pace1Muna Lougheed2Curtis Marcoux3Bradley Evans4Nikita Hickey5Meghan O’Leary6Jerry McGrath7Department of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, CanadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3 3N62, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, A1B 3V6, CanadaIn 2012 the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology published 19 indicators of safety compromise. We studied the incidence of these indicators by reviewing all colonoscopies performed in St. John’s, NL, between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012. Results. A total of 3235 colonoscopies were included. Adverse events are as follows. Medication-related includes use of reversal agents 0.1%, hypoxia 9.9%, hypotension 15.4%, and hypertension 0.9%. No patients required CPR or experienced allergic reactions or laryngospasm/bronchospasm. The indicator, “sedation dosages in patients older than 70,” showed lower usage of fentanyl and midazolam in elderly patients. Procedure-related immediate includes perforation 0.2%, immediate postpolypectomy bleeding 0.3%, need for hospital admission or transfer to the emergency department 0.1%, and severe persistent abdominal pain proven not to be perforation 0.4%. Instrument impaction was not seen. Procedure-related delayed includes death within 14 days 0.1%, unplanned health care visit within 14 days of the colonoscopy 1.8%, unplanned hospitalization within 14 days of the colonoscopy 0.6%, bleeding within 14 days of colonoscopy 0.2%, infection 0.03%, and metabolic complication 0.03%. Conclusions. The most common adverse events were mild and sedation related. Rates of serious adverse events were in keeping with published reports.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871
spellingShingle Mark R. Borgaonkar
David Pace
Muna Lougheed
Curtis Marcoux
Bradley Evans
Nikita Hickey
Meghan O’Leary
Jerry McGrath
Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_full Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_short Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice
title_sort canadian association of gastroenterology indicators of safety compromise following colonoscopy in clinical practice
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2729871
work_keys_str_mv AT markrborgaonkar canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT davidpace canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT munalougheed canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT curtismarcoux canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT bradleyevans canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT nikitahickey canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT meghanoleary canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice
AT jerrymcgrath canadianassociationofgastroenterologyindicatorsofsafetycompromisefollowingcolonoscopyinclinicalpractice