In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement

Objective The traditional magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing technique for pipelines has been found to be insufficient in detecting crack defects with a small angle to the magnetic field lines. As a result, an inspection method that can accurately detect such defects is urgently needed to ensure th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuangcheng FU FU, Bingfeng YU, Jiaxing XIN, Rong DING, Fan YANG, Hongwei LYU, Jinzhong CHEN, Xiaokang WAN
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation 2024-11-01
Series:You-qi chuyun
Subjects:
Online Access:https://yqcy.pipechina.com.cn/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.007
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850036718271463424
author Shuangcheng FU FU
Bingfeng YU
Jiaxing XIN
Rong DING
Fan YANG
Hongwei LYU
Jinzhong CHEN
Xiaokang WAN
author_facet Shuangcheng FU FU
Bingfeng YU
Jiaxing XIN
Rong DING
Fan YANG
Hongwei LYU
Jinzhong CHEN
Xiaokang WAN
author_sort Shuangcheng FU FU
collection DOAJ
description Objective The traditional magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing technique for pipelines has been found to be insufficient in detecting crack defects with a small angle to the magnetic field lines. As a result, an inspection method that can accurately detect such defects is urgently needed to ensure the safe operation of oil and gas pipelines. Methods This paper introduces an in-line inspection method for pipeline cracks based on a biased AC field measurement (B-ACFM) technique, which combines the strengths of both MFL testing and ACFM. The initial study focused on examining the variations in internal magnetic field and surface eddy current field distributions of specimens based on crack angles, in alignment with the fundamental principle of B-ACFM. Subsequently, a finite element analysis model was developed to elucidate the impacts on internal magnetic field and surface eddy current field distributions in the presence or absence of cracks. Furthermore, an experimental platform was constructed to validate the viability of the proposed method utilizing B-ACFM. Results For cracks positioned at varying angles from 0° to 15° on the inner wall, the signal characteristics displayed a wave trough followed by a wave peak. Conversely, for angles spanning from 15° to 90°, a phase reversal occurred, manifesting as a wave peak followed by a wave trough in the signal features. Regarding inner wall cracks ranging from 0° to 45°, the peak-to-valley value (Umax-min) of crack response signals exhibited a gradual decrease as the angle increased. However, beyond 45°, Umax-min rose with increasing angle. In terms of cracks with differing depths within the inner and outer walls, the response signals presented wave peaks followed by wave troughs, and Umax-min steadily ascended with increasing crack depth in both the inner and outer walls. Conclusion The suggested method showcases its efficacy in accurately detecting 0.3 mm wide cracks at various angles and 0.5 mm wide cracks angled at 90°, with differing depths in the inner pipeline wall. The established minimum detection depth is confirmed to reach 30% of the wall thickness for 0.5 mm wide cracks at a 90° angle in the outer pipeline wall. Furthermore, this method exhibits quantitative detection proficiency for cracks positioned at different angles on the inner pipeline wall and for those exhibiting varying depths within both the inner and outer pipeline walls.
format Article
id doaj-art-d2c4dd6f86dc4536a231fe931e1d5e7c
institution DOAJ
issn 1000-8241
language zho
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
record_format Article
series You-qi chuyun
spelling doaj-art-d2c4dd6f86dc4536a231fe931e1d5e7c2025-08-20T02:57:04ZzhoEditorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and TransportationYou-qi chuyun1000-82412024-11-0143111260126810.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.007yqcy-43-11-1260In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurementShuangcheng FU FU0Bingfeng YU1Jiaxing XIN2Rong DING3Fan YANG4Hongwei LYU5Jinzhong CHEN6Xiaokang WAN7School of Mechanical Engineering and Rail Transit, Changzhou UniversitySchool of Mechanical Engineering and Rail Transit, Changzhou UniversityChina Special Equipment Inspection & Research InstitutePipeChina West Pipeline Co. Ltd.PipeChina West Pipeline Co. Ltd.PipeChina West Pipeline Co. Ltd.China Special Equipment Inspection & Research InstituteChina Special Equipment Inspection & Research InstituteObjective The traditional magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing technique for pipelines has been found to be insufficient in detecting crack defects with a small angle to the magnetic field lines. As a result, an inspection method that can accurately detect such defects is urgently needed to ensure the safe operation of oil and gas pipelines. Methods This paper introduces an in-line inspection method for pipeline cracks based on a biased AC field measurement (B-ACFM) technique, which combines the strengths of both MFL testing and ACFM. The initial study focused on examining the variations in internal magnetic field and surface eddy current field distributions of specimens based on crack angles, in alignment with the fundamental principle of B-ACFM. Subsequently, a finite element analysis model was developed to elucidate the impacts on internal magnetic field and surface eddy current field distributions in the presence or absence of cracks. Furthermore, an experimental platform was constructed to validate the viability of the proposed method utilizing B-ACFM. Results For cracks positioned at varying angles from 0° to 15° on the inner wall, the signal characteristics displayed a wave trough followed by a wave peak. Conversely, for angles spanning from 15° to 90°, a phase reversal occurred, manifesting as a wave peak followed by a wave trough in the signal features. Regarding inner wall cracks ranging from 0° to 45°, the peak-to-valley value (Umax-min) of crack response signals exhibited a gradual decrease as the angle increased. However, beyond 45°, Umax-min rose with increasing angle. In terms of cracks with differing depths within the inner and outer walls, the response signals presented wave peaks followed by wave troughs, and Umax-min steadily ascended with increasing crack depth in both the inner and outer walls. Conclusion The suggested method showcases its efficacy in accurately detecting 0.3 mm wide cracks at various angles and 0.5 mm wide cracks angled at 90°, with differing depths in the inner pipeline wall. The established minimum detection depth is confirmed to reach 30% of the wall thickness for 0.5 mm wide cracks at a 90° angle in the outer pipeline wall. Furthermore, this method exhibits quantitative detection proficiency for cracks positioned at different angles on the inner pipeline wall and for those exhibiting varying depths within both the inner and outer pipeline walls.https://yqcy.pipechina.com.cn/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.007biased ac field measurement (b-acfm)crack detectioncrack anglecrack depthfinite element analysis
spellingShingle Shuangcheng FU FU
Bingfeng YU
Jiaxing XIN
Rong DING
Fan YANG
Hongwei LYU
Jinzhong CHEN
Xiaokang WAN
In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
You-qi chuyun
biased ac field measurement (b-acfm)
crack detection
crack angle
crack depth
finite element analysis
title In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
title_full In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
title_fullStr In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
title_full_unstemmed In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
title_short In-line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased AC field measurement
title_sort in line inspection of pipeline crack based on biased ac field measurement
topic biased ac field measurement (b-acfm)
crack detection
crack angle
crack depth
finite element analysis
url https://yqcy.pipechina.com.cn/cn/article/doi/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT shuangchengfufu inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT bingfengyu inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT jiaxingxin inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT rongding inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT fanyang inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT hongweilyu inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT jinzhongchen inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement
AT xiaokangwan inlineinspectionofpipelinecrackbasedonbiasedacfieldmeasurement