An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization

The history of thought has progressed through the continuous contributions from past accumulations. In this respect, one must be meticulous when examining the struggle successor-thinkers have had with their predecessors. A careful examination of these thinkers’ ties with their predecessors will reve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Çağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Istanbul University Press 2022-12-01
Series:Felsefe Arkivi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3DFB7B724B0A4914936216DF41D7A230
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850206703164850176
author Çağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan
author_facet Çağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan
author_sort Çağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan
collection DOAJ
description The history of thought has progressed through the continuous contributions from past accumulations. In this respect, one must be meticulous when examining the struggle successor-thinkers have had with their predecessors. A careful examination of these thinkers’ ties with their predecessors will reveal that no complete disagreement exists between them, with the thoughts of Rousseau and Nietzsche able to be shown as an example. Although Nietzsche harshly criticized Rousseau’s thoughts in some of his works, when looking at Nietzsche’s philosophy as a whole, many points are found where the thoughts of both philosophers overlap. For example, man in the state of nature as Rousseau had postulated is strong and self-sufficient, and all evil arises from sociality, or more appropriately, from the inequality brought about by sociality. When looking at Nietzsche’s thoughts, one again sees the affirmation of nature, but nature, and therefore humans in their natural state, also has a horrible face. In this context, although Nietzsche criticized Rousseau’s thoughts on many points, one should not ignore the issues both philosophers held in common. The main aim of this study is to draw attention to the overlapping points these two philosophers’ views had that developed in the center of human nature. Demonstrating some points that coincide between Nietzsche and Rousseau also includes an objection to the underestimation of the positivist considerations that human beings are benevolent by nature, because in the struggle to end the ongoing injustices in social life, one important factor is to have people understand their fellow humans as good beings by nature.
format Article
id doaj-art-d29ccb0ad00a4e5f936f487314b3f65b
institution OA Journals
issn 2667-7644
language deu
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series Felsefe Arkivi
spelling doaj-art-d29ccb0ad00a4e5f936f487314b3f65b2025-08-20T02:10:42ZdeuIstanbul University PressFelsefe Arkivi2667-76442022-12-0157153810.26650/arcp.1150827123456An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and SocializationÇağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-4727Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, TurkiyeThe history of thought has progressed through the continuous contributions from past accumulations. In this respect, one must be meticulous when examining the struggle successor-thinkers have had with their predecessors. A careful examination of these thinkers’ ties with their predecessors will reveal that no complete disagreement exists between them, with the thoughts of Rousseau and Nietzsche able to be shown as an example. Although Nietzsche harshly criticized Rousseau’s thoughts in some of his works, when looking at Nietzsche’s philosophy as a whole, many points are found where the thoughts of both philosophers overlap. For example, man in the state of nature as Rousseau had postulated is strong and self-sufficient, and all evil arises from sociality, or more appropriately, from the inequality brought about by sociality. When looking at Nietzsche’s thoughts, one again sees the affirmation of nature, but nature, and therefore humans in their natural state, also has a horrible face. In this context, although Nietzsche criticized Rousseau’s thoughts on many points, one should not ignore the issues both philosophers held in common. The main aim of this study is to draw attention to the overlapping points these two philosophers’ views had that developed in the center of human nature. Demonstrating some points that coincide between Nietzsche and Rousseau also includes an objection to the underestimation of the positivist considerations that human beings are benevolent by nature, because in the struggle to end the ongoing injustices in social life, one important factor is to have people understand their fellow humans as good beings by nature.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3DFB7B724B0A4914936216DF41D7A230human naturenatural stateaffirmation of faterousseaunietzsche
spellingShingle Çağdaş Emrah Çağlıyan
An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
Felsefe Arkivi
human nature
natural state
affirmation of fate
rousseau
nietzsche
title An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
title_full An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
title_fullStr An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
title_short An Overview of Rousseau’s and Nietzsche’s Approaches Regarding Their Thoughts on The State of Nature and Socialization
title_sort overview of rousseau s and nietzsche s approaches regarding their thoughts on the state of nature and socialization
topic human nature
natural state
affirmation of fate
rousseau
nietzsche
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/3DFB7B724B0A4914936216DF41D7A230
work_keys_str_mv AT cagdasemrahcaglıyan anoverviewofrousseausandnietzschesapproachesregardingtheirthoughtsonthestateofnatureandsocialization
AT cagdasemrahcaglıyan overviewofrousseausandnietzschesapproachesregardingtheirthoughtsonthestateofnatureandsocialization