Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.

<h4>Background</h4>The negative sensory properties of casein hydrolysates (HC) often limit their usage in products intended for human consumption, despite HC being nutritious and having many functional benefits. Recent, but taxonomically limited, evidence suggests that other animals also...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristin L Field, Alexander A Bachmanov, Julie A Mennella, Gary K Beauchamp, Bruce A Kimball
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004126&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850240777029943296
author Kristin L Field
Alexander A Bachmanov
Julie A Mennella
Gary K Beauchamp
Bruce A Kimball
author_facet Kristin L Field
Alexander A Bachmanov
Julie A Mennella
Gary K Beauchamp
Bruce A Kimball
author_sort Kristin L Field
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The negative sensory properties of casein hydrolysates (HC) often limit their usage in products intended for human consumption, despite HC being nutritious and having many functional benefits. Recent, but taxonomically limited, evidence suggests that other animals also avoid consuming HC when alternatives exist.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We evaluated ingestive responses of five herbivorous species (guinea pig, mountain beaver, gopher, vole, and rabbit) and five omnivorous species (rat, coyote, house mouse, white-footed mouse, and deer mouse; N = 16-18/species) using solid foods containing 20% HC in a series of two-choice preference tests that used a non-protein, cellulose-based alternative. Individuals were also tested with collagen hydrolysate (gelatin; GE) to determine whether it would induce similar ingestive responses to those induced by HC. Despite HC and GE having very different nutritional and sensory qualities, both hydrolysates produced similar preference score patterns. We found that the herbivores generally avoided the hydrolysates while the omnivores consumed them at similar levels to the cellulose diet or, more rarely, preferred them (HC by the white-footed mouse; GE by the rat). Follow-up preference tests pairing HC and the nutritionally equivalent intact casein (C) were performed on the three mouse species and the guinea pigs. For the mice, mean HC preference scores were lower in the HC v C compared to the HC v Cel tests, indicating that HC's sensory qualities negatively affected its consumption. However, responses were species-specific. For the guinea pigs, repeated exposure to HC or C (4.7-h sessions; N = 10) were found to increase subsequent HC preference scores in an HC v C preference test, which was interpreted in the light of conservative foraging strategies thought to typify herbivores.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This is the first empirical study of dietary niche-related taxonomic differences in ingestive responses to protein hydrolysates using multiple species under comparable conditions. Our results provide a basis for future work in sensory, physiological, and behavioral mechanisms of hydrolysate avoidance and on the potential use of hydrolysates for pest management.
format Article
id doaj-art-d1cda7fec4c04e919b7da970b0e80f44
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-d1cda7fec4c04e919b7da970b0e80f442025-08-20T02:00:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032009-01-0141e412610.1371/journal.pone.0004126Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.Kristin L FieldAlexander A BachmanovJulie A MennellaGary K BeauchampBruce A Kimball<h4>Background</h4>The negative sensory properties of casein hydrolysates (HC) often limit their usage in products intended for human consumption, despite HC being nutritious and having many functional benefits. Recent, but taxonomically limited, evidence suggests that other animals also avoid consuming HC when alternatives exist.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We evaluated ingestive responses of five herbivorous species (guinea pig, mountain beaver, gopher, vole, and rabbit) and five omnivorous species (rat, coyote, house mouse, white-footed mouse, and deer mouse; N = 16-18/species) using solid foods containing 20% HC in a series of two-choice preference tests that used a non-protein, cellulose-based alternative. Individuals were also tested with collagen hydrolysate (gelatin; GE) to determine whether it would induce similar ingestive responses to those induced by HC. Despite HC and GE having very different nutritional and sensory qualities, both hydrolysates produced similar preference score patterns. We found that the herbivores generally avoided the hydrolysates while the omnivores consumed them at similar levels to the cellulose diet or, more rarely, preferred them (HC by the white-footed mouse; GE by the rat). Follow-up preference tests pairing HC and the nutritionally equivalent intact casein (C) were performed on the three mouse species and the guinea pigs. For the mice, mean HC preference scores were lower in the HC v C compared to the HC v Cel tests, indicating that HC's sensory qualities negatively affected its consumption. However, responses were species-specific. For the guinea pigs, repeated exposure to HC or C (4.7-h sessions; N = 10) were found to increase subsequent HC preference scores in an HC v C preference test, which was interpreted in the light of conservative foraging strategies thought to typify herbivores.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This is the first empirical study of dietary niche-related taxonomic differences in ingestive responses to protein hydrolysates using multiple species under comparable conditions. Our results provide a basis for future work in sensory, physiological, and behavioral mechanisms of hydrolysate avoidance and on the potential use of hydrolysates for pest management.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004126&type=printable
spellingShingle Kristin L Field
Alexander A Bachmanov
Julie A Mennella
Gary K Beauchamp
Bruce A Kimball
Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
PLoS ONE
title Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
title_full Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
title_fullStr Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
title_full_unstemmed Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
title_short Protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two-choice preference tests.
title_sort protein hydrolysates are avoided by herbivores but not by omnivores in two choice preference tests
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0004126&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinlfield proteinhydrolysatesareavoidedbyherbivoresbutnotbyomnivoresintwochoicepreferencetests
AT alexanderabachmanov proteinhydrolysatesareavoidedbyherbivoresbutnotbyomnivoresintwochoicepreferencetests
AT julieamennella proteinhydrolysatesareavoidedbyherbivoresbutnotbyomnivoresintwochoicepreferencetests
AT garykbeauchamp proteinhydrolysatesareavoidedbyherbivoresbutnotbyomnivoresintwochoicepreferencetests
AT bruceakimball proteinhydrolysatesareavoidedbyherbivoresbutnotbyomnivoresintwochoicepreferencetests