Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System

The phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel E. Martin, Jeffrey W. Perine, Shanique Grant, Farah Abi-Akar, Jerri Lynn Henry, Mohamed A. Latheef
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Drones
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588654919286784
author Daniel E. Martin
Jeffrey W. Perine
Shanique Grant
Farah Abi-Akar
Jerri Lynn Henry
Mohamed A. Latheef
author_facet Daniel E. Martin
Jeffrey W. Perine
Shanique Grant
Farah Abi-Akar
Jerri Lynn Henry
Mohamed A. Latheef
author_sort Daniel E. Martin
collection DOAJ
description The phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and off-target movement of pesticide particles. A field study was conducted to compare in-swath and downwind spray deposition on ground samplers from a 20 L RPAAS platform, equipped with three different nozzles, which provided fine, medium, and extra-coarse droplet spectra. A fluorescent dye was used as a tracer to determine spray deposition. Airborne spray droplets were measured at 10 and 20 m downwind. Downwind deposition measured on ground samplers showed that the extra-coarse nozzle received significantly fewer deposits than the medium or the fine nozzle. Similarly, the airborne deposition for the extra-coarse nozzle was significantly less compared to either the fine or the medium nozzle. Linear mixed effects modeling confirmed these results and showed that wind speed served as a covariate by refining the deposition differences among nozzles. Results indicated that spray drift from RPAAS platforms may be mitigated by using appropriate nozzles that produce larger droplet spectra. These results will provide aerial applicators with a better understanding of the best management practices to mitigate drift.
format Article
id doaj-art-d18ed7dab6a24fb28c62175d131abd82
institution Kabale University
issn 2504-446X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Drones
spelling doaj-art-d18ed7dab6a24fb28c62175d131abd822025-01-24T13:29:51ZengMDPI AGDrones2504-446X2025-01-01916610.3390/drones9010066Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application SystemDaniel E. Martin0Jeffrey W. Perine1Shanique Grant2Farah Abi-Akar3Jerri Lynn Henry4Mohamed A. Latheef5United States Department of Agriculture, Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USAWaterborne Environmental Inc., Leesburg, VA 20175, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USAUnited States Department of Agriculture, Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USAThe phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and off-target movement of pesticide particles. A field study was conducted to compare in-swath and downwind spray deposition on ground samplers from a 20 L RPAAS platform, equipped with three different nozzles, which provided fine, medium, and extra-coarse droplet spectra. A fluorescent dye was used as a tracer to determine spray deposition. Airborne spray droplets were measured at 10 and 20 m downwind. Downwind deposition measured on ground samplers showed that the extra-coarse nozzle received significantly fewer deposits than the medium or the fine nozzle. Similarly, the airborne deposition for the extra-coarse nozzle was significantly less compared to either the fine or the medium nozzle. Linear mixed effects modeling confirmed these results and showed that wind speed served as a covariate by refining the deposition differences among nozzles. Results indicated that spray drift from RPAAS platforms may be mitigated by using appropriate nozzles that produce larger droplet spectra. These results will provide aerial applicators with a better understanding of the best management practices to mitigate drift.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66UASUAVRPAASspray dronedepositionspray drift
spellingShingle Daniel E. Martin
Jeffrey W. Perine
Shanique Grant
Farah Abi-Akar
Jerri Lynn Henry
Mohamed A. Latheef
Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
Drones
UAS
UAV
RPAAS
spray drone
deposition
spray drift
title Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
title_full Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
title_fullStr Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
title_full_unstemmed Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
title_short Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
title_sort spray deposition and drift as influenced by wind speed and spray nozzles from a remotely piloted aerial application system
topic UAS
UAV
RPAAS
spray drone
deposition
spray drift
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66
work_keys_str_mv AT danielemartin spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem
AT jeffreywperine spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem
AT shaniquegrant spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem
AT farahabiakar spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem
AT jerrilynnhenry spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem
AT mohamedalatheef spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem