Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System
The phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Drones |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832588654919286784 |
---|---|
author | Daniel E. Martin Jeffrey W. Perine Shanique Grant Farah Abi-Akar Jerri Lynn Henry Mohamed A. Latheef |
author_facet | Daniel E. Martin Jeffrey W. Perine Shanique Grant Farah Abi-Akar Jerri Lynn Henry Mohamed A. Latheef |
author_sort | Daniel E. Martin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and off-target movement of pesticide particles. A field study was conducted to compare in-swath and downwind spray deposition on ground samplers from a 20 L RPAAS platform, equipped with three different nozzles, which provided fine, medium, and extra-coarse droplet spectra. A fluorescent dye was used as a tracer to determine spray deposition. Airborne spray droplets were measured at 10 and 20 m downwind. Downwind deposition measured on ground samplers showed that the extra-coarse nozzle received significantly fewer deposits than the medium or the fine nozzle. Similarly, the airborne deposition for the extra-coarse nozzle was significantly less compared to either the fine or the medium nozzle. Linear mixed effects modeling confirmed these results and showed that wind speed served as a covariate by refining the deposition differences among nozzles. Results indicated that spray drift from RPAAS platforms may be mitigated by using appropriate nozzles that produce larger droplet spectra. These results will provide aerial applicators with a better understanding of the best management practices to mitigate drift. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d18ed7dab6a24fb28c62175d131abd82 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2504-446X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Drones |
spelling | doaj-art-d18ed7dab6a24fb28c62175d131abd822025-01-24T13:29:51ZengMDPI AGDrones2504-446X2025-01-01916610.3390/drones9010066Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application SystemDaniel E. Martin0Jeffrey W. Perine1Shanique Grant2Farah Abi-Akar3Jerri Lynn Henry4Mohamed A. Latheef5United States Department of Agriculture, Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USAWaterborne Environmental Inc., Leesburg, VA 20175, USASyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, USAUnited States Department of Agriculture, Aerial Application Technology Research Unit, College Station, TX 77845, USAThe phenomenal growth of remotely piloted aerial application systems (RPAASs) in recent years has raised questions about their impact on the off-target movement of plant protection products. The spray droplet spectrum is one of the important determining factors that govern droplet trajectories and off-target movement of pesticide particles. A field study was conducted to compare in-swath and downwind spray deposition on ground samplers from a 20 L RPAAS platform, equipped with three different nozzles, which provided fine, medium, and extra-coarse droplet spectra. A fluorescent dye was used as a tracer to determine spray deposition. Airborne spray droplets were measured at 10 and 20 m downwind. Downwind deposition measured on ground samplers showed that the extra-coarse nozzle received significantly fewer deposits than the medium or the fine nozzle. Similarly, the airborne deposition for the extra-coarse nozzle was significantly less compared to either the fine or the medium nozzle. Linear mixed effects modeling confirmed these results and showed that wind speed served as a covariate by refining the deposition differences among nozzles. Results indicated that spray drift from RPAAS platforms may be mitigated by using appropriate nozzles that produce larger droplet spectra. These results will provide aerial applicators with a better understanding of the best management practices to mitigate drift.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66UASUAVRPAASspray dronedepositionspray drift |
spellingShingle | Daniel E. Martin Jeffrey W. Perine Shanique Grant Farah Abi-Akar Jerri Lynn Henry Mohamed A. Latheef Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System Drones UAS UAV RPAAS spray drone deposition spray drift |
title | Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System |
title_full | Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System |
title_fullStr | Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System |
title_full_unstemmed | Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System |
title_short | Spray Deposition and Drift as Influenced by Wind Speed and Spray Nozzles from a Remotely Piloted Aerial Application System |
title_sort | spray deposition and drift as influenced by wind speed and spray nozzles from a remotely piloted aerial application system |
topic | UAS UAV RPAAS spray drone deposition spray drift |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/9/1/66 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielemartin spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem AT jeffreywperine spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem AT shaniquegrant spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem AT farahabiakar spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem AT jerrilynnhenry spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem AT mohamedalatheef spraydepositionanddriftasinfluencedbywindspeedandspraynozzlesfromaremotelypilotedaerialapplicationsystem |