Expression Dynamics and Genetic Compensation of Cell Cycle Paralogues in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>
Cell cycle progression of the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Cells |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/14/6/412 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Cell cycle progression of the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a pair of paralogues, which are considered to have similar functions and periods of expression. Here, we use single molecule inexpensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (smiFISH) to measure the expression of five pairs of paralogous genes relevant for cell cycle progression (<i>CLN1</i>/<i>CLN2</i>, <i>CLB5</i>/<i>CLB6</i>, <i>CLB3</i>/<i>CLB4</i>, <i>CLB1</i>/<i>CLB2</i> and <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>) in a large number of unsynchronized single cells representing all cell cycle phases. We systematically compare their expression patterns and strengths. In addition, we also analyze the effect of the knockout of one part of each pair on the expression of the other gene. In order to classify cells into specific cell cycle phases, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN). We find that the expression levels of some cell-cycle related paralogues differ in their correlation, with <i>CLN1</i> and <i>CLN2</i> showing strong correlation and <i>CLB3</i> and <i>CLB4</i> showing weakest correlation. The temporal profiles of some pairs also differ. Upon deletion of their paralogue, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> seem to compensate for the expression of the other gene, while this was not observed for <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>. Interestingly, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> also seem to share work between mother and bud in the G2 phase, where <i>CLB2</i> is primarily expressed in the bud and <i>CLB1</i> in the mother. Taken together, our results suggest that paralogues related to yeast cell cycle progression should not be considered as the same but differ both in their expression strength and timing as well in their precise role in cell cycle regulation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2073-4409 |