On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment

The present paper attempts to discuss the semantic history of a handful of terms of endearment (aka pet names, sweet talk, affectionate talk, soft words, terms of affection or sweet words) and the role of the cognitive mechanisms in the changes of their meaning. We focus the reader’s attention on a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agnieszka Grząśko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2015-12-01
Series:LingBaW
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/5626
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592818837651456
author Agnieszka Grząśko
author_facet Agnieszka Grząśko
author_sort Agnieszka Grząśko
collection DOAJ
description The present paper attempts to discuss the semantic history of a handful of terms of endearment (aka pet names, sweet talk, affectionate talk, soft words, terms of affection or sweet words) and the role of the cognitive mechanisms in the changes of their meaning. We focus the reader’s attention on a few lexical items which represent such mechanisms as foodsemy (e.g. honey, sugar), which seems to be one of the most prolific ones, plantosemy (pumpkin) or zoosemy (pet). Furthermore, we trace the semantic development of terms which from the beginning of their existence have been employed as pet names (sweetheart), words which are no longer endearments, because they underwent the process of meaning amelioration or pejoration (mopsy, bully) and – last but not least – nouns whose semantic shift is based on the pattern (POSITIVE) EMOTIONS → ENDEARMENTS (joy).
format Article
id doaj-art-d10e74c86fd24b5c8039bbb16778e28d
institution Kabale University
issn 2450-5188
language English
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series LingBaW
spelling doaj-art-d10e74c86fd24b5c8039bbb16778e28d2025-01-21T05:09:18ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLingBaW2450-51882015-12-011110.31743/lingbaw.5626On the semantic history of selected terms of endearmentAgnieszka Grząśko0Rzeszów University The present paper attempts to discuss the semantic history of a handful of terms of endearment (aka pet names, sweet talk, affectionate talk, soft words, terms of affection or sweet words) and the role of the cognitive mechanisms in the changes of their meaning. We focus the reader’s attention on a few lexical items which represent such mechanisms as foodsemy (e.g. honey, sugar), which seems to be one of the most prolific ones, plantosemy (pumpkin) or zoosemy (pet). Furthermore, we trace the semantic development of terms which from the beginning of their existence have been employed as pet names (sweetheart), words which are no longer endearments, because they underwent the process of meaning amelioration or pejoration (mopsy, bully) and – last but not least – nouns whose semantic shift is based on the pattern (POSITIVE) EMOTIONS → ENDEARMENTS (joy). https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/5626endearmentameliorationpejorationzoosemyfoodsemyplantosemy
spellingShingle Agnieszka Grząśko
On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
LingBaW
endearment
amelioration
pejoration
zoosemy
foodsemy
plantosemy
title On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
title_full On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
title_fullStr On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
title_full_unstemmed On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
title_short On the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
title_sort on the semantic history of selected terms of endearment
topic endearment
amelioration
pejoration
zoosemy
foodsemy
plantosemy
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/5626
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkagrzasko onthesemantichistoryofselectedtermsofendearment