UAV Remote Sensing Technology for Wheat Growth Monitoring in Precision Agriculture: Comparison of Data Quality and Growth Parameter Inversion

The quality of the image data and the potential to invert crop growth parameters are essential for effectively using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based sensor systems in precision agriculture (PA). However, the existing research falls short in providing a comprehensive examination of sensor data qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jikai Liu, Weiqiang Wang, Jun Li, Ghulam Mustafa, Xiangxiang Su, Ying Nian, Qiang Ma, Fengxian Zhen, Wenhui Wang, Xinwei Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/1/159
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The quality of the image data and the potential to invert crop growth parameters are essential for effectively using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based sensor systems in precision agriculture (PA). However, the existing research falls short in providing a comprehensive examination of sensor data quality and the inversion potential of crop growth parameters, and there is still ambiguity regarding how the quality of data affects the inversion potential. Therefore, this study explored the application potential of RGB and multispectral (MS) images acquired from three lightweight UAV platforms in the realm of PA: the DJI Mavic 2 Pro (M2P), Phantom 4 Multispectral (P4M), and Mavic 3 Multispectral (M3M). The reliability of pixel-scale data quality was evaluated based on image quality assessment metrics, and three winter wheat growth parameters, above-ground biomass (AGB), plant nitrogen content (PNC) and soil and plant analysis development (SPAD), were inverted using machine learning models based on multi-source image features at the plot scale. The results indicated that the RGB image quality from the M3M outperformed that of the M2P, while the MS image quality was marginally superior to that of the P4M. Nevertheless, these advantages in pixel-scale data quality did not improve inversion accuracy for crop parameters at the plot scale. Spectral features (SFs) derived from the P4M-based MS sensor demonstrated significant advantages in AGB inversion (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86, rRMSE = 27.47%), while SFs derived from the M2P-based RGB camera exhibited the best performance in SPAD inversion (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60, rRMSE = 7.67%). Additionally, combining spectral and textural features derived from the P4M-based MS sensor yielded the highest accuracy in PNC inversion (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82, rRMSE = 14.62%). This study clarified the data quality of three prevalent UAV mounted sensor systems in PA and their influence on parameter inversion potential, offering guidance for selecting appropriate sensors and monitoring key crop growth parameters.
ISSN:2073-4395