Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme

Background. As the malignant potential of sessile serrated lesions/polyps (SSL/Ps) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) has been clearly demonstrated, it is important that serrated polyps are identified and correctly classified histologically. Aim. Our aim was to characterize the clinicopatholog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. J. McCarthy, S. M. O’Reilly, J. Shanley, R. Geraghty, E. J. Ryan, G. Cullen, K. Sheahan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1592306
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564781082476544
author A. J. McCarthy
S. M. O’Reilly
J. Shanley
R. Geraghty
E. J. Ryan
G. Cullen
K. Sheahan
author_facet A. J. McCarthy
S. M. O’Reilly
J. Shanley
R. Geraghty
E. J. Ryan
G. Cullen
K. Sheahan
author_sort A. J. McCarthy
collection DOAJ
description Background. As the malignant potential of sessile serrated lesions/polyps (SSL/Ps) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) has been clearly demonstrated, it is important that serrated polyps are identified and correctly classified histologically. Aim. Our aim was to characterize the clinicopathological features of a series of SSL/Ps & TSAs, to assess the accuracy of the pathological diagnosis, the incidence, and the rate of dysplasia in SSL/Ps & TSAs. Methods. We identified all colorectal serrated polyps between 01/01/2004 and 31/05/2016, by searching the laboratory information system for all cases assigned a “serrated adenoma” SNOMED code. All available and suitable slides were reviewed by one pathologist, who was blinded to the original diagnosis and the site of the polyp. Subsequently discordant cases, SSL/Ps with dysplasia, and all TSAs were reviewed by a second pathologist. Results. Over a 149-month period, 759 “serrated adenoma” polyps were identified, with 664 (from 523 patients) available for review. 41.1% were reviewed by both pathologists; 15.1% (100/664) were reclassified, with the majority being changed from SSL/P to hyperplastic polyp (HYP) (66/664; 9.9%). 80.3% of these HYPs were located in the left colon, and the majority exhibited prolapse effect. There were 520 SSL/Ps (92.2%) & 40 TSAs (7.1%). The majority of SSL/Ps were in the right colon (86.7%) and were small (64.5% <1 cm), while most TSAs were in the left colon (85.7%) and were large (73.1%≥1 cm). 6.7% of SSL/Ps exhibited dysplasia, the majority of which were large (66.7%≥1 cm). Following consensus review, 13/520 (2.5%) SSL/Ps were downgraded from SSL/P with dysplasia to SSL/P without dysplasia. Detection of SSL/Ps peaked in the most recent years reviewed (87.5% reported between 2013 and 2016, inclusive), coinciding with the introduction of “BowelScreen” (the Irish FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme). Conclusions. Awareness of, and adherence to, diagnostic criteria is essential for accurate classification of colorectal polyps.
format Article
id doaj-art-d04615f6e2a1407dbe108d22247ba8a3
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-d04615f6e2a1407dbe108d22247ba8a32025-02-03T01:10:17ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2019-01-01201910.1155/2019/15923061592306Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening ProgrammeA. J. McCarthy0S. M. O’Reilly1J. Shanley2R. Geraghty3E. J. Ryan4G. Cullen5K. Sheahan6Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandDepartment of Histopathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandDepartment of Histopathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandDepartment of Histopathology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, IrelandBackground. As the malignant potential of sessile serrated lesions/polyps (SSL/Ps) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) has been clearly demonstrated, it is important that serrated polyps are identified and correctly classified histologically. Aim. Our aim was to characterize the clinicopathological features of a series of SSL/Ps & TSAs, to assess the accuracy of the pathological diagnosis, the incidence, and the rate of dysplasia in SSL/Ps & TSAs. Methods. We identified all colorectal serrated polyps between 01/01/2004 and 31/05/2016, by searching the laboratory information system for all cases assigned a “serrated adenoma” SNOMED code. All available and suitable slides were reviewed by one pathologist, who was blinded to the original diagnosis and the site of the polyp. Subsequently discordant cases, SSL/Ps with dysplasia, and all TSAs were reviewed by a second pathologist. Results. Over a 149-month period, 759 “serrated adenoma” polyps were identified, with 664 (from 523 patients) available for review. 41.1% were reviewed by both pathologists; 15.1% (100/664) were reclassified, with the majority being changed from SSL/P to hyperplastic polyp (HYP) (66/664; 9.9%). 80.3% of these HYPs were located in the left colon, and the majority exhibited prolapse effect. There were 520 SSL/Ps (92.2%) & 40 TSAs (7.1%). The majority of SSL/Ps were in the right colon (86.7%) and were small (64.5% <1 cm), while most TSAs were in the left colon (85.7%) and were large (73.1%≥1 cm). 6.7% of SSL/Ps exhibited dysplasia, the majority of which were large (66.7%≥1 cm). Following consensus review, 13/520 (2.5%) SSL/Ps were downgraded from SSL/P with dysplasia to SSL/P without dysplasia. Detection of SSL/Ps peaked in the most recent years reviewed (87.5% reported between 2013 and 2016, inclusive), coinciding with the introduction of “BowelScreen” (the Irish FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme). Conclusions. Awareness of, and adherence to, diagnostic criteria is essential for accurate classification of colorectal polyps.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1592306
spellingShingle A. J. McCarthy
S. M. O’Reilly
J. Shanley
R. Geraghty
E. J. Ryan
G. Cullen
K. Sheahan
Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
title_full Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
title_fullStr Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
title_short Colorectal Serrated Neoplasia: An Institutional 12-Year Review Highlights the Impact of a Screening Programme
title_sort colorectal serrated neoplasia an institutional 12 year review highlights the impact of a screening programme
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1592306
work_keys_str_mv AT ajmccarthy colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT smoreilly colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT jshanley colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT rgeraghty colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT ejryan colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT gcullen colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme
AT ksheahan colorectalserratedneoplasiaaninstitutional12yearreviewhighlightstheimpactofascreeningprogramme