Argumentation, Cooperation, and Disagreement
Abstract: To get a better comprehension of the nature of argumentation, we need to understand the context in which this practice produces its particular benefits. I hold that this context consists basically in the presence of two conditions: 1) the need for cooperation, and 2) the possibility of di...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Fabian Bernache Maldonado |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8416 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Epistemic Injustice in the Criminal Trial
by: Federico Picinali
Published: (2025-01-01) -
A Critical Perspective on Testimonial Injustice: Interrogating Witnesses' Credibility Excess in Criminal Trials
by: Jasmine Gonzales Rose
Published: (2024-06-01) -
The Benefits and Burdens of Engaging in Argumentation: Trans*feminist Reflections on Tuvel’s “In Defense of Transracialism”
by: Stephanie Julia Kapusta
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Accurate Stereotypes and Testimonial Injustice
by: Leonie Smith
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Epistemic injustices and curriculum: Strategizing for justice
by: Yogendra Babu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)