Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya

Valuation of ecosystem services (ESs) can be typical as use values and passive use values. However, the prevailing conventional markets provide economic instruments such as price tags to ecosystem use values, but rarely on passive use values. This is limited since it does not provide comprehensive e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justus E. Eregae, Paul Njogu, Rebecca Karanja, Moses Gichua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5867745
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850172250945224704
author Justus E. Eregae
Paul Njogu
Rebecca Karanja
Moses Gichua
author_facet Justus E. Eregae
Paul Njogu
Rebecca Karanja
Moses Gichua
author_sort Justus E. Eregae
collection DOAJ
description Valuation of ecosystem services (ESs) can be typical as use values and passive use values. However, the prevailing conventional markets provide economic instruments such as price tags to ecosystem use values, but rarely on passive use values. This is limited since it does not provide comprehensive ecological values that will adequately support rational decision-making processes regarding ecological conservation. The study adopted the contingency valuation method (CVM) where three hundred and eighty households of communities living within the Elgeyo watershed were sampled. The findings recorded 97% of the population was willing to pay for the ESs quoted. Individual maximum WTP ranged between 1 USD and 57.1 USD (cultural), 1 USD and 95.2 USD (bequest), and 1 USD and 76.2 USD (biodiversity conservation). The overall mean maximum WTP was 7.4 ± 0.34 USD, 9.1 ± 0.49 USD, and 11.1 ± 0.68 USD for the cultural, bequest, and biodiversity, respectively. The multivariate regression (maximum WTP as a function of administrative location, education, income, sex, age, and livestock number) exhibited a significant difference regardless of multivariate criteria used, where Wilks’ lambda has F (75,203) = 4.03, p<0.001. The findings provide an economic value for nonuse values that can be incorporated in total economic valuation (TEV) studies locally as well as provide an impetus on payment of ecosystem services (PES) in Kenya.
format Article
id doaj-art-cf6c8a69f95949bd87a3a2c4fe51a07e
institution OA Journals
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Forestry Research
spelling doaj-art-cf6c8a69f95949bd87a3a2c4fe51a07e2025-08-20T02:20:07ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762021-01-01202110.1155/2021/58677455867745Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, KenyaJustus E. Eregae0Paul Njogu1Rebecca Karanja2Moses Gichua3Institute of Energy and Environmental Technology (IEET) of JKUAT, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, KenyaInstitute of Energy and Environmental Technology (IEET) of JKUAT, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, KenyaPlant and Microbial Sciences Department, Kenyatta University (KU), P.O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, KenyaBotany Department, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, KenyaValuation of ecosystem services (ESs) can be typical as use values and passive use values. However, the prevailing conventional markets provide economic instruments such as price tags to ecosystem use values, but rarely on passive use values. This is limited since it does not provide comprehensive ecological values that will adequately support rational decision-making processes regarding ecological conservation. The study adopted the contingency valuation method (CVM) where three hundred and eighty households of communities living within the Elgeyo watershed were sampled. The findings recorded 97% of the population was willing to pay for the ESs quoted. Individual maximum WTP ranged between 1 USD and 57.1 USD (cultural), 1 USD and 95.2 USD (bequest), and 1 USD and 76.2 USD (biodiversity conservation). The overall mean maximum WTP was 7.4 ± 0.34 USD, 9.1 ± 0.49 USD, and 11.1 ± 0.68 USD for the cultural, bequest, and biodiversity, respectively. The multivariate regression (maximum WTP as a function of administrative location, education, income, sex, age, and livestock number) exhibited a significant difference regardless of multivariate criteria used, where Wilks’ lambda has F (75,203) = 4.03, p<0.001. The findings provide an economic value for nonuse values that can be incorporated in total economic valuation (TEV) studies locally as well as provide an impetus on payment of ecosystem services (PES) in Kenya.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5867745
spellingShingle Justus E. Eregae
Paul Njogu
Rebecca Karanja
Moses Gichua
Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
International Journal of Forestry Research
title Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
title_full Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
title_fullStr Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
title_short Economic Valuation for Cultural and Passive Ecosystem Services Using a Stated Preference (Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)) Case of the Elgeyo Watershed Ecosystem, Kenya
title_sort economic valuation for cultural and passive ecosystem services using a stated preference contingent valuation method cvm case of the elgeyo watershed ecosystem kenya
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5867745
work_keys_str_mv AT justuseeregae economicvaluationforculturalandpassiveecosystemservicesusingastatedpreferencecontingentvaluationmethodcvmcaseoftheelgeyowatershedecosystemkenya
AT paulnjogu economicvaluationforculturalandpassiveecosystemservicesusingastatedpreferencecontingentvaluationmethodcvmcaseoftheelgeyowatershedecosystemkenya
AT rebeccakaranja economicvaluationforculturalandpassiveecosystemservicesusingastatedpreferencecontingentvaluationmethodcvmcaseoftheelgeyowatershedecosystemkenya
AT mosesgichua economicvaluationforculturalandpassiveecosystemservicesusingastatedpreferencecontingentvaluationmethodcvmcaseoftheelgeyowatershedecosystemkenya