Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights

Salmonella contamination in poultry products is a significant concern due to its potential to cause severe economic losses and public health problems. On the other side, coccidiosis is induced by Eimeria (E.) species. involves the destruction of host intestinal epithelial cells and subsequent invasi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini, Hanseo Ko, Doyun Goo, Venkata Sesha Reddy Choppa, Seshidhar Reddy Gudidoddi, Hemanth Reddy Katha, Woo Kyun Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011465
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591872099352576
author Hamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini
Hanseo Ko
Doyun Goo
Venkata Sesha Reddy Choppa
Seshidhar Reddy Gudidoddi
Hemanth Reddy Katha
Woo Kyun Kim
author_facet Hamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini
Hanseo Ko
Doyun Goo
Venkata Sesha Reddy Choppa
Seshidhar Reddy Gudidoddi
Hemanth Reddy Katha
Woo Kyun Kim
author_sort Hamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini
collection DOAJ
description Salmonella contamination in poultry products is a significant concern due to its potential to cause severe economic losses and public health problems. On the other side, coccidiosis is induced by Eimeria (E.) species. involves the destruction of host intestinal epithelial cells and subsequent invasion of pathogens, resulting in performance reduction and enhanced pathogen infection in poultry and economic losses for the poultry industry. A study was conducted to evaluate the impact of Eimeria infection and Salmonella typhimurium (ST) on growth performance, Salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota in turkey poult. A total of 420 one-day-old male turkey poults were randomly allocated into six treatments, with five replicated cages for each treatment, over a 21-day experimental period. The study followed a 2 × 3 factorial design. Treatments consisted of NC, negative control without any challenge; T1, challenged with 8000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T2, challenged with 16,000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T3, challenged with nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella typhimurium (ST) at d 0; T4, challenged with ST at d 0 and 8000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T5, challenged with ST at d 0 and 16,000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8. The Eimeria challenge groups significantly reduced the BW compared to the non-challenge group (P < 0.001). The challenged groups decreased FI during 9–14 days of age (P < 0.01). Salmonella typhimurium did not affect BW entire trial period (P > 0.05). Gut permeability (GP) increased in the challenge groups compared to the NC group (P < 0.001). Both ST and Eimeria significantly decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the liver (P < 0.01). The challenge groups had lower villus height (VH) and higher crypt depth (CD) compared to the NC group, resulting in decreased VH:CD ratio in the duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.01). The groups T1, T2, and T4 had significantly higher fat deposition than the NC group (P < 0.05). The coinfected groups (T4 and T5) had higher salmonella colonization in the spleen compared to the ST-infected group (T3, P < 0.05). The ST challenge significantly decreased alpha diversity, including pielou evenness and Shannon entropy (P < 0.05). The Proteobacteria phylum and Enterobacteriaceae family significantly increased in T5 compared to the NC, T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Eimeria infection negatively impacted growth, gut health, intestine barrier integrity, and histology, while Salmonella had a milder effect on performance. Coinfection with Salmonella and Eimeria spp. led to changes in gut microbiota and increased liver Salmonella colonization and fat deposition in turkey poults.
format Article
id doaj-art-cf5295d5536e410eb02bb429a6b537c0
institution Kabale University
issn 0032-5791
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj-art-cf5295d5536e410eb02bb429a6b537c02025-01-22T05:40:31ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912025-01-011041104568Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insightsHamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini0Hanseo Ko1Doyun Goo2Venkata Sesha Reddy Choppa3Seshidhar Reddy Gudidoddi4Hemanth Reddy Katha5Woo Kyun Kim6Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USADepartment of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USACorresponding author at: Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USA.; Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2772, USASalmonella contamination in poultry products is a significant concern due to its potential to cause severe economic losses and public health problems. On the other side, coccidiosis is induced by Eimeria (E.) species. involves the destruction of host intestinal epithelial cells and subsequent invasion of pathogens, resulting in performance reduction and enhanced pathogen infection in poultry and economic losses for the poultry industry. A study was conducted to evaluate the impact of Eimeria infection and Salmonella typhimurium (ST) on growth performance, Salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota in turkey poult. A total of 420 one-day-old male turkey poults were randomly allocated into six treatments, with five replicated cages for each treatment, over a 21-day experimental period. The study followed a 2 × 3 factorial design. Treatments consisted of NC, negative control without any challenge; T1, challenged with 8000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T2, challenged with 16,000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T3, challenged with nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella typhimurium (ST) at d 0; T4, challenged with ST at d 0 and 8000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8; T5, challenged with ST at d 0 and 16,000 oocysts of E. meleagrimitis and E. adenoeides at d 8. The Eimeria challenge groups significantly reduced the BW compared to the non-challenge group (P < 0.001). The challenged groups decreased FI during 9–14 days of age (P < 0.01). Salmonella typhimurium did not affect BW entire trial period (P > 0.05). Gut permeability (GP) increased in the challenge groups compared to the NC group (P < 0.001). Both ST and Eimeria significantly decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the liver (P < 0.01). The challenge groups had lower villus height (VH) and higher crypt depth (CD) compared to the NC group, resulting in decreased VH:CD ratio in the duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.01). The groups T1, T2, and T4 had significantly higher fat deposition than the NC group (P < 0.05). The coinfected groups (T4 and T5) had higher salmonella colonization in the spleen compared to the ST-infected group (T3, P < 0.05). The ST challenge significantly decreased alpha diversity, including pielou evenness and Shannon entropy (P < 0.05). The Proteobacteria phylum and Enterobacteriaceae family significantly increased in T5 compared to the NC, T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Eimeria infection negatively impacted growth, gut health, intestine barrier integrity, and histology, while Salmonella had a milder effect on performance. Coinfection with Salmonella and Eimeria spp. led to changes in gut microbiota and increased liver Salmonella colonization and fat deposition in turkey poults.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011465TurkeyEimeriaSalmonellaGut healthGut microbiota
spellingShingle Hamid Reza Rafieian-Naeini
Hanseo Ko
Doyun Goo
Venkata Sesha Reddy Choppa
Seshidhar Reddy Gudidoddi
Hemanth Reddy Katha
Woo Kyun Kim
Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
Poultry Science
Turkey
Eimeria
Salmonella
Gut health
Gut microbiota
title Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
title_full Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
title_fullStr Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
title_full_unstemmed Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
title_short Synergistic impact of Salmonella typhimurium and Eimeria spp. coinfection on turkey poults: Growth performance, salmonella colonization, and ceca microbiota insights
title_sort synergistic impact of salmonella typhimurium and eimeria spp coinfection on turkey poults growth performance salmonella colonization and ceca microbiota insights
topic Turkey
Eimeria
Salmonella
Gut health
Gut microbiota
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124011465
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidrezarafieiannaeini synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT hanseoko synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT doyungoo synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT venkataseshareddychoppa synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT seshidharreddygudidoddi synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT hemanthreddykatha synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights
AT wookyunkim synergisticimpactofsalmonellatyphimuriumandeimeriasppcoinfectiononturkeypoultsgrowthperformancesalmonellacolonizationandcecamicrobiotainsights