The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical clascoterone (TC) compared to oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>A computerized search through PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to find rele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad A Basendwh, Amer Abdulaziz Alharbi, Sarah Abdulla Bukhamsin, Rahaf Abdulrashid Abdulwahab, Sarah Abdullah Alaboud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298155
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592748906020864
author Mohammad A Basendwh
Amer Abdulaziz Alharbi
Sarah Abdulla Bukhamsin
Rahaf Abdulrashid Abdulwahab
Sarah Abdullah Alaboud
author_facet Mohammad A Basendwh
Amer Abdulaziz Alharbi
Sarah Abdulla Bukhamsin
Rahaf Abdulrashid Abdulwahab
Sarah Abdullah Alaboud
author_sort Mohammad A Basendwh
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical clascoterone (TC) compared to oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>A computerized search through PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to find relevant papers. We used the "netmeta" and "meta" packages for network meta-analysis (NMA) in RStudio 1.2.5019 (2009-2019 RStudio, Inc.) to conduct all of our statistical tests.<h4>Results</h4>Seven articles (n = 2,006 patients) were included. The fixed-effect size showed that TC 1% bis in die (BID) showed potential effectiveness in reducing the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count compared to placebo (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.17) and (SMD = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.22), respectively. The random-effect size showed that TC 1% BID was significantly associated with a 12-week treatment success compared to placebo (Odds ratio, OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.12 to 5.30). Spironolactone 200 mg was associated with a significant reduction in total lesion count (SMD = -4.46, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.32).<h4>Conclusion</h4>TC appears to reduce both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count and may lead to treatment success. Spironolactone at 200 mg showed potential effectiveness in terms of total lesion count reduction. These results suggest that both TC and Spironolactone could be beneficial in treating patients with acne vulgaris.
format Article
id doaj-art-cee12579953d4aa883f0f3407ee839f1
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-cee12579953d4aa883f0f3407ee839f12025-01-21T05:31:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01195e029815510.1371/journal.pone.0298155The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Mohammad A BasendwhAmer Abdulaziz AlharbiSarah Abdulla BukhamsinRahaf Abdulrashid AbdulwahabSarah Abdullah Alaboud<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical clascoterone (TC) compared to oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>A computerized search through PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to find relevant papers. We used the "netmeta" and "meta" packages for network meta-analysis (NMA) in RStudio 1.2.5019 (2009-2019 RStudio, Inc.) to conduct all of our statistical tests.<h4>Results</h4>Seven articles (n = 2,006 patients) were included. The fixed-effect size showed that TC 1% bis in die (BID) showed potential effectiveness in reducing the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count compared to placebo (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.17) and (SMD = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.22), respectively. The random-effect size showed that TC 1% BID was significantly associated with a 12-week treatment success compared to placebo (Odds ratio, OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.12 to 5.30). Spironolactone 200 mg was associated with a significant reduction in total lesion count (SMD = -4.46, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.32).<h4>Conclusion</h4>TC appears to reduce both inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count and may lead to treatment success. Spironolactone at 200 mg showed potential effectiveness in terms of total lesion count reduction. These results suggest that both TC and Spironolactone could be beneficial in treating patients with acne vulgaris.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298155
spellingShingle Mohammad A Basendwh
Amer Abdulaziz Alharbi
Sarah Abdulla Bukhamsin
Rahaf Abdulrashid Abdulwahab
Sarah Abdullah Alaboud
The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short The efficacy of Topical Clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort efficacy of topical clascoterone versus systematic spironolactone for treatment of acne vulgaris a systematic review and network meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298155
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadabasendwh theefficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT amerabdulazizalharbi theefficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sarahabdullabukhamsin theefficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT rahafabdulrashidabdulwahab theefficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sarahabdullahalaboud theefficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mohammadabasendwh efficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT amerabdulazizalharbi efficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sarahabdullabukhamsin efficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT rahafabdulrashidabdulwahab efficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sarahabdullahalaboud efficacyoftopicalclascoteroneversussystematicspironolactonefortreatmentofacnevulgarisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis