Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda

Governance plays a critical role in shaping rural development outcomes, acting both as an enabler and a constraint to sustainable livelihoods. Although rural development research in Uganda has focused mainly on financial input, less attention has been paid to institutional and governance dynamics th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betty Claire Mubangizi, Abel Nzabona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Noyam Journals 2025-07-01
Series:E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EHASS20256816.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850074251053236224
author Betty Claire Mubangizi
Abel Nzabona
author_facet Betty Claire Mubangizi
Abel Nzabona
author_sort Betty Claire Mubangizi
collection DOAJ
description Governance plays a critical role in shaping rural development outcomes, acting both as an enabler and a constraint to sustainable livelihoods. Although rural development research in Uganda has focused mainly on financial input, less attention has been paid to institutional and governance dynamics that determine how resources are mobilised, allocated, and translated into tangible benefits for rural communities. This study contributes to the rural livelihood discourse by examining the governance structures and practices in the southwestern districts of Isingiro and Kisoro through a qualitative approach involving 34 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) and four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Guided by Institutional Theory and Network Governance Theory, the study reveals that although governance frameworks, such as those set out in Uganda’s Local Government Act of 1997, formally empower sub-national units to engage in planning, budgeting, and service delivery, their implementation is significantly hindered by institutional capacity constraints, centralised fiscal control, and political interference. The findings also highlight the importance of informal governance mechanisms, such as the locally respected “L.C. Zero” structures, which operate outside the formal state architecture yet play a vital role in community-level decision-making and accountability. These insights underscore the need for governance reforms that strengthen institutional capacity, promote locally grounded accountability mechanisms, and foster collaborative networks between state and non-state actors to support resilient and inclusive rural development.
format Article
id doaj-art-ce20df9b7f814e8b8ea074f94e13a32f
institution DOAJ
issn 2720-7722
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Noyam Journals
record_format Article
series E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
spelling doaj-art-ce20df9b7f814e8b8ea074f94e13a32f2025-08-20T02:46:37ZengNoyam JournalsE-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences2720-77222025-07-016814801494https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20256816Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern UgandaBetty Claire Mubangizi 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-7193 Abel Nzabona1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-1792University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Centre for Basic Research - Kampala, Uganda.Governance plays a critical role in shaping rural development outcomes, acting both as an enabler and a constraint to sustainable livelihoods. Although rural development research in Uganda has focused mainly on financial input, less attention has been paid to institutional and governance dynamics that determine how resources are mobilised, allocated, and translated into tangible benefits for rural communities. This study contributes to the rural livelihood discourse by examining the governance structures and practices in the southwestern districts of Isingiro and Kisoro through a qualitative approach involving 34 Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) and four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Guided by Institutional Theory and Network Governance Theory, the study reveals that although governance frameworks, such as those set out in Uganda’s Local Government Act of 1997, formally empower sub-national units to engage in planning, budgeting, and service delivery, their implementation is significantly hindered by institutional capacity constraints, centralised fiscal control, and political interference. The findings also highlight the importance of informal governance mechanisms, such as the locally respected “L.C. Zero” structures, which operate outside the formal state architecture yet play a vital role in community-level decision-making and accountability. These insights underscore the need for governance reforms that strengthen institutional capacity, promote locally grounded accountability mechanisms, and foster collaborative networks between state and non-state actors to support resilient and inclusive rural development.https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EHASS20256816.pdfdecentralised governanceinstitutional capacityrural livelihoodsuganda
spellingShingle Betty Claire Mubangizi
Abel Nzabona
Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
decentralised governance
institutional capacity
rural livelihoods
uganda
title Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
title_full Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
title_fullStr Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
title_short Governance and Rural Livelihoods: Experiences From Southwestern Uganda
title_sort governance and rural livelihoods experiences from southwestern uganda
topic decentralised governance
institutional capacity
rural livelihoods
uganda
url https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/EHASS20256816.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bettyclairemubangizi governanceandrurallivelihoodsexperiencesfromsouthwesternuganda
AT abelnzabona governanceandrurallivelihoodsexperiencesfromsouthwesternuganda