Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology.
In this process-article, I have considered what complexities might affect research of prison education when using Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist (New) Materialism thinking. Through an imagined conversation with these 3 concepts as abstract ‘beings’, I have answered provocative questions abou...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Liverpool John Moores University
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PRISM |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/671 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832557725932847104 |
|---|---|
| author | Lucy Harding |
| author_facet | Lucy Harding |
| author_sort | Lucy Harding |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In this process-article, I have considered what complexities might affect research of prison education when using Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist (New) Materialism thinking. Through an imagined conversation with these 3 concepts as abstract ‘beings’, I have answered provocative questions about my research methods, apparatus, and ethics. Working at the intersections of abstractness (imagined conversations) and materialisms (creative, stitched outcomes and physical prison spaces), we think and feel-through the use of walking interviews, a visual matrix, and diffractive analysis to research the experiences of teachers working in prisons. Research of prison education is messy, and in embracing the discomfort, this process-article will enable others to traverse the knots using creative, affective approaches to research in prisons. In being-with these concepts, I trace the influences of philosophers and theorists in these practices, including the work of Deleuze & Guattari, Braidotti, Barad, Haraway, Manning, St. Pierre, Springgay, Truman, and others. The outcomes are unknown except for the benefit of opening new ways of thinking and feeling with inquiry and the writing of that process.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cde9b168806a45eeb5cb7a4ad1d7daee |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2514-5347 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Liverpool John Moores University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PRISM |
| spelling | doaj-art-cde9b168806a45eeb5cb7a4ad1d7daee2025-02-03T03:18:04ZengLiverpool John Moores UniversityPRISM2514-53472023-01-0151Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology.Lucy Harding0University of Central Lancashire In this process-article, I have considered what complexities might affect research of prison education when using Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist (New) Materialism thinking. Through an imagined conversation with these 3 concepts as abstract ‘beings’, I have answered provocative questions about my research methods, apparatus, and ethics. Working at the intersections of abstractness (imagined conversations) and materialisms (creative, stitched outcomes and physical prison spaces), we think and feel-through the use of walking interviews, a visual matrix, and diffractive analysis to research the experiences of teachers working in prisons. Research of prison education is messy, and in embracing the discomfort, this process-article will enable others to traverse the knots using creative, affective approaches to research in prisons. In being-with these concepts, I trace the influences of philosophers and theorists in these practices, including the work of Deleuze & Guattari, Braidotti, Barad, Haraway, Manning, St. Pierre, Springgay, Truman, and others. The outcomes are unknown except for the benefit of opening new ways of thinking and feeling with inquiry and the writing of that process. https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/671post-qualitativeposthumanfeminist materialismdiffractionprison education |
| spellingShingle | Lucy Harding Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. PRISM post-qualitative posthuman feminist materialism diffraction prison education |
| title | Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. |
| title_full | Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. |
| title_fullStr | Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. |
| title_short | Researching in prison education-spaces: Thinking-with Posthuman, Post Qualitative, Feminist Materialism ‘beings’ to disentangle methodology. |
| title_sort | researching in prison education spaces thinking with posthuman post qualitative feminist materialism beings to disentangle methodology |
| topic | post-qualitative posthuman feminist materialism diffraction prison education |
| url | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/prism/article/view/671 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucyharding researchinginprisoneducationspacesthinkingwithposthumanpostqualitativefeministmaterialismbeingstodisentanglemethodology |