Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case
<b>Background:</b> Locally acting gastrointestinal (GI) drugs present challenges for generic drug development because traditional bioequivalence measures, which rely on systemic drug levels, do not reflect local efficacy. This review examines regulatory guidelines for establishing therap...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Pharmaceutics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/839 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849251887826599936 |
|---|---|
| author | Georgia Tsakiridou Antigoni Maria Papanastasiou Panagiotis Efentakis Maria Faidra Galini Angelerou Lida Kalantzi |
| author_facet | Georgia Tsakiridou Antigoni Maria Papanastasiou Panagiotis Efentakis Maria Faidra Galini Angelerou Lida Kalantzi |
| author_sort | Georgia Tsakiridou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <b>Background:</b> Locally acting gastrointestinal (GI) drugs present challenges for generic drug development because traditional bioequivalence measures, which rely on systemic drug levels, do not reflect local efficacy. This review examines regulatory guidelines for establishing therapeutic equivalence for such drugs, using rifaximin—a minimally absorbed, gut-localized antibiotic—as a case study. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed bioequivalence guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), along with the literature on rifaximin’s biopharmaceutical and clinical properties, to identify strategies and challenges for establishing equivalence for locally acting GI drugs. <b>Results:</b> Rifaximin exemplifies the limitations of standard bioequivalence methods: as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class IV drug with minimal absorption and low solubility, in vitro dissolution may not predict local drug availability. Clinical endpoint trials (e.g., traveler’s diarrhea, hepatic encephalopathy, IBS-D) are resource-intensive and insensitive to formulation differences. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers show low, variable plasma levels, which may inaccurately discriminate between formulations. The EMA requires evidence of non-saturable absorption to accept PK data, a difficult-to-establish but potentially irrelevant criterion. Differences between FDA and EMA approaches highlight a lack of harmonization, complicating global generic development. <b>Conclusions:</b> A tailored, multifaceted approach is needed to demonstrate bioequivalence for GI-localized drugs like rifaximin. This case underscores the need for more sensitive surrogate methods (e.g. advanced in vitro or pharmacodynamic models) and flexible regulatory criteria. Harmonization across international guidelines and innovative bioequivalence study designs are key to facilitating the approval of safe and effective generic alternatives in this drug class. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cdad507903a94de9bbb29dec6b70d016 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1999-4923 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pharmaceutics |
| spelling | doaj-art-cdad507903a94de9bbb29dec6b70d0162025-08-20T03:56:47ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232025-06-0117783910.3390/pharmaceutics17070839Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin CaseGeorgia Tsakiridou0Antigoni Maria Papanastasiou1Panagiotis Efentakis2Maria Faidra Galini Angelerou3Lida Kalantzi4Pharmathen SA, 31 Spartis Str., 14452 Metamorfosi Attica, GreecePharmathen SA, 31 Spartis Str., 14452 Metamorfosi Attica, GreecePharmathen SA, 31 Spartis Str., 14452 Metamorfosi Attica, GreecePharmathen SA, 31 Spartis Str., 14452 Metamorfosi Attica, GreecePharmathen SA, 31 Spartis Str., 14452 Metamorfosi Attica, Greece<b>Background:</b> Locally acting gastrointestinal (GI) drugs present challenges for generic drug development because traditional bioequivalence measures, which rely on systemic drug levels, do not reflect local efficacy. This review examines regulatory guidelines for establishing therapeutic equivalence for such drugs, using rifaximin—a minimally absorbed, gut-localized antibiotic—as a case study. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed bioequivalence guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA), along with the literature on rifaximin’s biopharmaceutical and clinical properties, to identify strategies and challenges for establishing equivalence for locally acting GI drugs. <b>Results:</b> Rifaximin exemplifies the limitations of standard bioequivalence methods: as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class IV drug with minimal absorption and low solubility, in vitro dissolution may not predict local drug availability. Clinical endpoint trials (e.g., traveler’s diarrhea, hepatic encephalopathy, IBS-D) are resource-intensive and insensitive to formulation differences. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers show low, variable plasma levels, which may inaccurately discriminate between formulations. The EMA requires evidence of non-saturable absorption to accept PK data, a difficult-to-establish but potentially irrelevant criterion. Differences between FDA and EMA approaches highlight a lack of harmonization, complicating global generic development. <b>Conclusions:</b> A tailored, multifaceted approach is needed to demonstrate bioequivalence for GI-localized drugs like rifaximin. This case underscores the need for more sensitive surrogate methods (e.g. advanced in vitro or pharmacodynamic models) and flexible regulatory criteria. Harmonization across international guidelines and innovative bioequivalence study designs are key to facilitating the approval of safe and effective generic alternatives in this drug class.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/839locally applied and locally acting productsgastrointestinal trackbioequivalencerifaximin |
| spellingShingle | Georgia Tsakiridou Antigoni Maria Papanastasiou Panagiotis Efentakis Maria Faidra Galini Angelerou Lida Kalantzi Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case Pharmaceutics locally applied and locally acting products gastrointestinal track bioequivalence rifaximin |
| title | Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case |
| title_full | Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case |
| title_fullStr | Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case |
| title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case |
| title_short | Challenges in the Investigation of Therapeutic Equivalence of Locally Applied/Locally Acting Drugs in the Gastrointestinal Tract: The Rifaximin Case |
| title_sort | challenges in the investigation of therapeutic equivalence of locally applied locally acting drugs in the gastrointestinal tract the rifaximin case |
| topic | locally applied and locally acting products gastrointestinal track bioequivalence rifaximin |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/7/839 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT georgiatsakiridou challengesintheinvestigationoftherapeuticequivalenceoflocallyappliedlocallyactingdrugsinthegastrointestinaltracttherifaximincase AT antigonimariapapanastasiou challengesintheinvestigationoftherapeuticequivalenceoflocallyappliedlocallyactingdrugsinthegastrointestinaltracttherifaximincase AT panagiotisefentakis challengesintheinvestigationoftherapeuticequivalenceoflocallyappliedlocallyactingdrugsinthegastrointestinaltracttherifaximincase AT mariafaidragaliniangelerou challengesintheinvestigationoftherapeuticequivalenceoflocallyappliedlocallyactingdrugsinthegastrointestinaltracttherifaximincase AT lidakalantzi challengesintheinvestigationoftherapeuticequivalenceoflocallyappliedlocallyactingdrugsinthegastrointestinaltracttherifaximincase |