Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure

Leisure is both a necessary precondition for, and the ultimate purpose of, human activities. As such, it is commonly understood as a state of contemplation practiced for its own sake. However, this view raises a problem regarding its universal accessibility. Aristotle’s ethical and political theori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lianchong Deng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2024-10-01
Series:Problemos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/35769
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593090399961088
author Lianchong Deng
author_facet Lianchong Deng
author_sort Lianchong Deng
collection DOAJ
description Leisure is both a necessary precondition for, and the ultimate purpose of, human activities. As such, it is commonly understood as a state of contemplation practiced for its own sake. However, this view raises a problem regarding its universal accessibility. Aristotle’s ethical and political theories demand leisure as a universally embraced way of life, while contemplative leisure appears impractical for common people. There are broadly two approaches to fix this problem: (a) distinguishing leisure of two sorts, and (b) expanding the semantic scope of contemplation. Nevertheless, they both come with certain limitations. I propose redefining leisure as a moral-psychological concept aligned with the allegedly hexis-state of the soul. This redefinition presents leisure as a basic human condition, offering a possible solution to the problem of its universal accessibility.
format Article
id doaj-art-cda745e6ae9e4a288263a592218ce036
institution Kabale University
issn 1392-1126
2424-6158
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Problemos
spelling doaj-art-cda745e6ae9e4a288263a592218ce0362025-01-20T18:24:19ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61582024-10-0110610.15388/Problemos.2024.106.2Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in LeisureLianchong Deng0https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8700-2196Zhejiang University Leisure is both a necessary precondition for, and the ultimate purpose of, human activities. As such, it is commonly understood as a state of contemplation practiced for its own sake. However, this view raises a problem regarding its universal accessibility. Aristotle’s ethical and political theories demand leisure as a universally embraced way of life, while contemplative leisure appears impractical for common people. There are broadly two approaches to fix this problem: (a) distinguishing leisure of two sorts, and (b) expanding the semantic scope of contemplation. Nevertheless, they both come with certain limitations. I propose redefining leisure as a moral-psychological concept aligned with the allegedly hexis-state of the soul. This redefinition presents leisure as a basic human condition, offering a possible solution to the problem of its universal accessibility. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/35769AristotleLeisureSoulMoral psychology
spellingShingle Lianchong Deng
Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
Problemos
Aristotle
Leisure
Soul
Moral psychology
title Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
title_full Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
title_fullStr Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
title_full_unstemmed Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
title_short Aristotle and the Problem of Universal Accessibility in Leisure
title_sort aristotle and the problem of universal accessibility in leisure
topic Aristotle
Leisure
Soul
Moral psychology
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/35769
work_keys_str_mv AT lianchongdeng aristotleandtheproblemofuniversalaccessibilityinleisure