Experiences from dual genome next-generation sequencing panel testing for mitochondrial disorders: a comprehensive molecular diagnosis
IntroductionThe molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders is complicated by phenotypic variability, genetic heterogeneity, and the complexity of mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the mitochondrial genome in combination with a targeted panel of nuclear genes associa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Genetics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1488956/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | IntroductionThe molecular diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders is complicated by phenotypic variability, genetic heterogeneity, and the complexity of mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the mitochondrial genome in combination with a targeted panel of nuclear genes associated with mitochondrial disease provides the highest likelihood of obtaining a comprehensive molecular diagnosis. To assess the clinical utility of this approach, we describe the results from a retrospective review of patients having dual genome panel testing for mitochondrial disease.MethodsDual genome panel testing by NGS was performed on a cohort of 1,509 unrelated affected individuals with suspected mitochondrial disorders. This test included 163 nuclear genes associated with mitochondrial diseases and the entire mitochondrial genome. A retrospective review was performed to evaluate diagnostic yield, disease-gene contributions, and heteroplasmy levels of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variants.ResultsThe overall diagnostic yield was 14.6%, with 7.7% from the nuclear genome and 6.9% from the mtDNA genome. P/LP variants in nuclear genes were enriched in both well-established genes (e.g., POLG) and more recently described genes (e.g., FBXL4), highlighting the importance of keeping the panel design updated.ConclusionVariants in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes equally contributed to a 14.6% diagnostic yield in this patient cohort. Dual genome NGS testing provides a comprehensive framework for diagnosing mitochondrial disorders, offering clinical utility that can be considered as first-tier approach compared to single genome testing. Characterizing disease-causing genes, variants, and mtDNA heteroplasmy enhances understanding of mitochondrial disorders. Testing alternative tissues can further increase diagnostic yield. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1664-8021 |