How to review a scientific paper
A review process is a key factor which ensures reliable and accurate presentation of new, useful, and original scientific knowledge to the public. Despite of many shortcomings which this evaluation of scientific work has, it is still an indispensable part of the process of scientific publishing. Dif...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Aleksandar Dekanski, Ivana Drvenica, Olgica Nedić |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Engineering Society for Corrosion, Belgrade
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Zaštita Materijala |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.zastita-materijala.org/index.php/home/article/view/516 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
THE OZ BEHIND THE CURTAIN EFFECT: ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE ASSESSMENT OF SCIENTIFIC MERITS
by: MARIA CERNAT
Published: (2011-04-01) -
Abuse of peer review process by sham authors
by: Senthil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Thank You to 'Journal of Scientific Innovation in Medicine' Reviewers in 2022, 2023, and 2024
by: Kris Alpi
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Training undergraduate biomedical science majors in peer review and constructive criticism through a senior capstone course
by: Kelly J. Collins
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Structured peer review: implementation and checklist development
by: Bahar Mehmani, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)