Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud

Abstract We are discussing a scenario where a compact star (neutron star, NS) is embedded in a thin, uniform density background cloud (a remnant cloud after a supernova or a cloud generated from the late stages of a star e.g., a planetary nebula or asymptotic red giant phases) and its effect on the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ksh. Newton Singh, S. K. Maurya, A. Errehymy, O. Donmez, K. Myrzakulov, T. T. Smitha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-12-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13661-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571405471842304
author Ksh. Newton Singh
S. K. Maurya
A. Errehymy
O. Donmez
K. Myrzakulov
T. T. Smitha
author_facet Ksh. Newton Singh
S. K. Maurya
A. Errehymy
O. Donmez
K. Myrzakulov
T. T. Smitha
author_sort Ksh. Newton Singh
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We are discussing a scenario where a compact star (neutron star, NS) is embedded in a thin, uniform density background cloud (a remnant cloud after a supernova or a cloud generated from the late stages of a star e.g., a planetary nebula or asymptotic red giant phases) and its effect on the stability of the compact star. Due to the thin background cloud, the spacetime geometry is minimally deformed allowing us to employ the technique of minimal geometric decoupling (MGD). Assuming a uniform background cloud density simplifies the problem, and through the MGD method, one can take $$\Theta ^t_t = \Theta > 0$$ Θ t t = Θ > 0 , where $$\Theta $$ Θ is the density of the cloud. The background cloud interacts with the compact star through a coupling strength $$\alpha $$ α . By varying $$\alpha $$ α , one can tune the cloud density to analyze the stability of the embedded compact star. We found that for $$\alpha < 3 \times 10^{-5}$$ α < 3 × 10 - 5 , all the thermodynamic quantities are well-behaved, indicating a stable configuration. Once the coupling parameter exceeds $$3 \times 10^{-5}$$ 3 × 10 - 5 , the adiabatic index drops below $$\Gamma _{\text {max}}'$$ Γ max ′ , triggering a gravitational collapse. Beyond this limit of $$\alpha $$ α , the pressure and speed of sound also become non-physical. At the end, we have used the $$M-R$$ M - R curve generated from the solution to determine the radii of a few compact stars, namely PSR J1614-2230, PSR J0952-0607, GW190814, and GW200210. Furthermore, we have discussed the possibility of the secondary component of GW200210 i.e. the less massive compact object with an upper mass of $$3.3M_\odot $$ 3.3 M ⊙ , which may be a stellar black hole with a Schwarzschild radius $$R_{\text {BH}} = 9.746$$ R BH = 9.746 km. However, if the mass is $$2.83M_\odot $$ 2.83 M ⊙ as observed, then its predicted minimum radius is 10.74 km, corresponding to $$\alpha = 0$$ α = 0 . This radius is far beyond $$R_{\text {BH}} = 8.357$$ R BH = 8.357 km and therefore is most probably a massive NS in the mass gap.
format Article
id doaj-art-ccfafcad4f5544939f7f49e78d744874
institution Kabale University
issn 1434-6052
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
spelling doaj-art-ccfafcad4f5544939f7f49e78d7448742025-02-02T12:39:44ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60522024-12-0184121910.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13661-1Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloudKsh. Newton Singh0S. K. Maurya1A. Errehymy2O. Donmez3K. Myrzakulov4T. T. Smitha5Department of Physics, National Defence AcademyDepartment of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of NizwaAstrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-NatalCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle EastDepartment of General and Theoretical Physics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityDepartment of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of NizwaAbstract We are discussing a scenario where a compact star (neutron star, NS) is embedded in a thin, uniform density background cloud (a remnant cloud after a supernova or a cloud generated from the late stages of a star e.g., a planetary nebula or asymptotic red giant phases) and its effect on the stability of the compact star. Due to the thin background cloud, the spacetime geometry is minimally deformed allowing us to employ the technique of minimal geometric decoupling (MGD). Assuming a uniform background cloud density simplifies the problem, and through the MGD method, one can take $$\Theta ^t_t = \Theta > 0$$ Θ t t = Θ > 0 , where $$\Theta $$ Θ is the density of the cloud. The background cloud interacts with the compact star through a coupling strength $$\alpha $$ α . By varying $$\alpha $$ α , one can tune the cloud density to analyze the stability of the embedded compact star. We found that for $$\alpha < 3 \times 10^{-5}$$ α < 3 × 10 - 5 , all the thermodynamic quantities are well-behaved, indicating a stable configuration. Once the coupling parameter exceeds $$3 \times 10^{-5}$$ 3 × 10 - 5 , the adiabatic index drops below $$\Gamma _{\text {max}}'$$ Γ max ′ , triggering a gravitational collapse. Beyond this limit of $$\alpha $$ α , the pressure and speed of sound also become non-physical. At the end, we have used the $$M-R$$ M - R curve generated from the solution to determine the radii of a few compact stars, namely PSR J1614-2230, PSR J0952-0607, GW190814, and GW200210. Furthermore, we have discussed the possibility of the secondary component of GW200210 i.e. the less massive compact object with an upper mass of $$3.3M_\odot $$ 3.3 M ⊙ , which may be a stellar black hole with a Schwarzschild radius $$R_{\text {BH}} = 9.746$$ R BH = 9.746 km. However, if the mass is $$2.83M_\odot $$ 2.83 M ⊙ as observed, then its predicted minimum radius is 10.74 km, corresponding to $$\alpha = 0$$ α = 0 . This radius is far beyond $$R_{\text {BH}} = 8.357$$ R BH = 8.357 km and therefore is most probably a massive NS in the mass gap.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13661-1
spellingShingle Ksh. Newton Singh
S. K. Maurya
A. Errehymy
O. Donmez
K. Myrzakulov
T. T. Smitha
Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
title Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
title_full Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
title_fullStr Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
title_full_unstemmed Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
title_short Stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
title_sort stability of compact stars in a uniform density background cloud
url https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13661-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kshnewtonsingh stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud
AT skmaurya stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud
AT aerrehymy stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud
AT odonmez stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud
AT kmyrzakulov stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud
AT ttsmitha stabilityofcompactstarsinauniformdensitybackgroundcloud