A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major problems in the drug therapy. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are the most common ADRs. The pattern of CADRs differs among various drugs. Aims: To record various morphological patterns of CADRs and their causal relationships among patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sujata Sinha, Chinamy Kar, Sudip Das, Arnab Dutta, Abhishek De
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_944_20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593702554435584
author Sujata Sinha
Chinamy Kar
Sudip Das
Arnab Dutta
Abhishek De
author_facet Sujata Sinha
Chinamy Kar
Sudip Das
Arnab Dutta
Abhishek De
author_sort Sujata Sinha
collection DOAJ
description Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major problems in the drug therapy. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are the most common ADRs. The pattern of CADRs differs among various drugs. Aims: To record various morphological patterns of CADRs and their causal relationships among patients attending in a tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, clinical study was conducted for a duration of one and a half years in a tertiary care centre in eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected CADRs were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling and drug history were recorded, and causality assessment was carried out as per the Naranjo scale. Result: The commonest CADR in our study was fixed drug eruption (FDE) 48.61%, followed by SJS-TEN spectrum 16.66%, maculopapular rash 11.11% and so on. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as SJS, TEN, SJS-TEN Overlap, AGEP and DRESS accounted for 18 cases (25%). The most common culprit drugs were antimicrobials (54.16%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (15.27%) and anticonvulsants (12.5%). Most of the CADRs were in probable category. Conclusion: The pattern of CADRs and the drugs causing them in our study population are similar to some previous studies but somewhat different from most of the previous Indian studies. The incidence of SCARs was significantly higher than in previous other studies in India and abroad.
format Article
id doaj-art-ccf83bac96334c8c905c6a0a8b6200b4
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Dermatology
spelling doaj-art-ccf83bac96334c8c905c6a0a8b6200b42025-01-20T10:36:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dermatology0019-51541998-36112024-01-0169110610610.4103/ijd.ijd_944_20A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern IndiaSujata SinhaChinamy KarSudip DasArnab DuttaAbhishek DeBackground: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are major problems in the drug therapy. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are the most common ADRs. The pattern of CADRs differs among various drugs. Aims: To record various morphological patterns of CADRs and their causal relationships among patients attending in a tertiary care centre. Materials and Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, clinical study was conducted for a duration of one and a half years in a tertiary care centre in eastern India. Patients presenting with suspected CADRs were included if drug identity could be ascertained. Clinical profiling and drug history were recorded, and causality assessment was carried out as per the Naranjo scale. Result: The commonest CADR in our study was fixed drug eruption (FDE) 48.61%, followed by SJS-TEN spectrum 16.66%, maculopapular rash 11.11% and so on. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as SJS, TEN, SJS-TEN Overlap, AGEP and DRESS accounted for 18 cases (25%). The most common culprit drugs were antimicrobials (54.16%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (15.27%) and anticonvulsants (12.5%). Most of the CADRs were in probable category. Conclusion: The pattern of CADRs and the drugs causing them in our study population are similar to some previous studies but somewhat different from most of the previous Indian studies. The incidence of SCARs was significantly higher than in previous other studies in India and abroad.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_944_20antimicrobialscutaneous adverse drug reactionsfixed drug eruption
spellingShingle Sujata Sinha
Chinamy Kar
Sudip Das
Arnab Dutta
Abhishek De
A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
Indian Journal of Dermatology
antimicrobials
cutaneous adverse drug reactions
fixed drug eruption
title A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
title_full A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
title_fullStr A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
title_full_unstemmed A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
title_short A Clinico-Epidemiological Study of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Eastern India
title_sort clinico epidemiological study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care centre of eastern india
topic antimicrobials
cutaneous adverse drug reactions
fixed drug eruption
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijd.ijd_944_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sujatasinha aclinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT chinamykar aclinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT sudipdas aclinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT arnabdutta aclinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT abhishekde aclinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT sujatasinha clinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT chinamykar clinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT sudipdas clinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT arnabdutta clinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia
AT abhishekde clinicoepidemiologicalstudyofcutaneousadversedrugreactionsinatertiarycarecentreofeasternindia