Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees

Introduction. There is no diagnosis for phantom limb pain (PLP), and its investigation is based on anamnesis, which is subject to several biases. Therefore, it is important to describe and standardize the diagnostic methodology for PLP. Objective. To characterise PLP and, secondarily, to determine p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Tadeu Sugawara, Marcel Simis, Felipe Fregni, Linamara Rizzo Battistella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2706731
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545950309023744
author André Tadeu Sugawara
Marcel Simis
Felipe Fregni
Linamara Rizzo Battistella
author_facet André Tadeu Sugawara
Marcel Simis
Felipe Fregni
Linamara Rizzo Battistella
author_sort André Tadeu Sugawara
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. There is no diagnosis for phantom limb pain (PLP), and its investigation is based on anamnesis, which is subject to several biases. Therefore, it is important to describe and standardize the diagnostic methodology for PLP. Objective. To characterise PLP and, secondarily, to determine predictors for its diagnosis. Methodology. This is a cross-sectional study involving patients with unilateral traumatic lower-limb amputation aged over 18 years. Those with clinical decompensation or evidence of disease, trauma, or surgery in the central or peripheral nervous system were excluded. Sociodemographic and rehabilitative data were collected; PLP was characterised using the visual analogue scale (VAS), pain descriptors, and weekly frequency. Results. A total of 55 eligible patients participated in the study; most were male, young, above-knee amputees in the preprosthetic phase of the rehabilitation. The median PLP VAS was 60 (50–79.3) mm characterised by 13 (6–20) different descriptors in the same patient, which coexist, alternate, and add up to a frequency of 3.94 (2.5–4.38) times per week. The most frequent descriptor was movement of the phantom limb (70.91%). Tingling, numbness, flushing, itchiness, spasm, tremor, and throbbing are statistically significant PLP descriptor numbers per patient predicted by above-knee amputation, prosthetic phase, higher education level, and greater PLP intensity by VAS (p<0.05). Conclusion. PLP is not a single symptom, but a set with different sensations and perceptions that need directed and guided anamnesis for proper diagnosis.
format Article
id doaj-art-ccadefb2b9db4360b152020ff9de59e8
institution Kabale University
issn 1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-ccadefb2b9db4360b152020ff9de59e82025-02-03T07:24:16ZengWileyPain Research and Management1918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/2706731Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb AmputeesAndré Tadeu Sugawara0Marcel Simis1Felipe Fregni2Linamara Rizzo Battistella3Instituto de Medicina Física e ReabilitaçãoInstituto de Medicina Física e ReabilitaçãoNeuromodulation CenterInstituto de Medicina Física e ReabilitaçãoIntroduction. There is no diagnosis for phantom limb pain (PLP), and its investigation is based on anamnesis, which is subject to several biases. Therefore, it is important to describe and standardize the diagnostic methodology for PLP. Objective. To characterise PLP and, secondarily, to determine predictors for its diagnosis. Methodology. This is a cross-sectional study involving patients with unilateral traumatic lower-limb amputation aged over 18 years. Those with clinical decompensation or evidence of disease, trauma, or surgery in the central or peripheral nervous system were excluded. Sociodemographic and rehabilitative data were collected; PLP was characterised using the visual analogue scale (VAS), pain descriptors, and weekly frequency. Results. A total of 55 eligible patients participated in the study; most were male, young, above-knee amputees in the preprosthetic phase of the rehabilitation. The median PLP VAS was 60 (50–79.3) mm characterised by 13 (6–20) different descriptors in the same patient, which coexist, alternate, and add up to a frequency of 3.94 (2.5–4.38) times per week. The most frequent descriptor was movement of the phantom limb (70.91%). Tingling, numbness, flushing, itchiness, spasm, tremor, and throbbing are statistically significant PLP descriptor numbers per patient predicted by above-knee amputation, prosthetic phase, higher education level, and greater PLP intensity by VAS (p<0.05). Conclusion. PLP is not a single symptom, but a set with different sensations and perceptions that need directed and guided anamnesis for proper diagnosis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2706731
spellingShingle André Tadeu Sugawara
Marcel Simis
Felipe Fregni
Linamara Rizzo Battistella
Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
Pain Research and Management
title Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
title_full Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
title_fullStr Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
title_full_unstemmed Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
title_short Characterisation of Phantom Limb Pain in Traumatic Lower-Limb Amputees
title_sort characterisation of phantom limb pain in traumatic lower limb amputees
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2706731
work_keys_str_mv AT andretadeusugawara characterisationofphantomlimbpainintraumaticlowerlimbamputees
AT marcelsimis characterisationofphantomlimbpainintraumaticlowerlimbamputees
AT felipefregni characterisationofphantomlimbpainintraumaticlowerlimbamputees
AT linamararizzobattistella characterisationofphantomlimbpainintraumaticlowerlimbamputees