Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)

Background: While isavuconazole (ISA) has demonstrated non-inferiority to voriconazole (VCZ) for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in clinical trials, real-world comparisons are limited. Objectives: To compare treatment completion, adverse events, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs in patients treated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophea Chan, Laura Leigh Stoudenmire, Xianyan Chen, Duna Zhan, Andrés F. Henao-Martínez, Daniel B. Chastain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-06-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251347778
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850121852615131136
author Sophea Chan
Laura Leigh Stoudenmire
Xianyan Chen
Duna Zhan
Andrés F. Henao-Martínez
Daniel B. Chastain
author_facet Sophea Chan
Laura Leigh Stoudenmire
Xianyan Chen
Duna Zhan
Andrés F. Henao-Martínez
Daniel B. Chastain
author_sort Sophea Chan
collection DOAJ
description Background: While isavuconazole (ISA) has demonstrated non-inferiority to voriconazole (VCZ) for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in clinical trials, real-world comparisons are limited. Objectives: To compare treatment completion, adverse events, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs in patients treated with VCZ versus ISA for IA. Design: Retrospective cohort study using Merative MarketScan claims data (2017–2020). Methods: Adults (⩾18 years) diagnosed with IA (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes) who received VCZ or ISA monotherapy were included. Treatment completion was defined as ⩾42 days of therapy. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess outcomes and predictors of antifungal selection, adverse events, hospitalizations, and treatment completion. Results: Among 335 patients, 84% ( n  = 282) received VCZ and 16% ( n  = 53) received ISA. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although the VCZ group had higher Medicaid enrollment, and the ISA group had more patients with malignancy. Treatment completion rates were comparable (92% each, p  = 1), as were median treatment durations (VCZ: 120 days, ISA: 112 days, p  = 0.95). Adverse event rates were not significantly different (VCZ: 49%, ISA: 60%, p  = 0.18), but CNS-related events occurred more frequently with ISA (16% vs 9%, p  = 0.32). VCZ was associated with lower outpatient pharmacy costs (median $1,596.68 vs $11,000.66, p  < 0.001) and total hospitalization costs (median $40,681.89 vs $121,545.89, p  = 0.01). Malignancy was associated with lower odds of receiving VCZ (OR 0.30, p  = 0.001), and younger age predicted higher odds of treatment incompletion (OR 0.97, p  = 0.035). Female sex was associated with increased adverse event risk. Notably, VCZ use was not associated with increased adverse events or treatment incompletion. Conclusion: VCZ was prescribed five times more frequently than ISA for IA, despite similar treatment durations and completion rates. VCZ was associated with lower costs and did not increase the risk of adverse events or treatment discontinuation. These findings suggest that VCZ remains commonly used and potentially more cost-effective treatment option for IA.
format Article
id doaj-art-cc3eac0f19d94e4c88a9055c31d22b45
institution OA Journals
issn 2049-937X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
spelling doaj-art-cc3eac0f19d94e4c88a9055c31d22b452025-08-20T02:34:59ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease2049-937X2025-06-011210.1177/20499361251347778Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)Sophea ChanLaura Leigh StoudenmireXianyan ChenDuna ZhanAndrés F. Henao-MartínezDaniel B. ChastainBackground: While isavuconazole (ISA) has demonstrated non-inferiority to voriconazole (VCZ) for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in clinical trials, real-world comparisons are limited. Objectives: To compare treatment completion, adverse events, hospitalizations, and healthcare costs in patients treated with VCZ versus ISA for IA. Design: Retrospective cohort study using Merative MarketScan claims data (2017–2020). Methods: Adults (⩾18 years) diagnosed with IA (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes) who received VCZ or ISA monotherapy were included. Treatment completion was defined as ⩾42 days of therapy. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess outcomes and predictors of antifungal selection, adverse events, hospitalizations, and treatment completion. Results: Among 335 patients, 84% ( n  = 282) received VCZ and 16% ( n  = 53) received ISA. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although the VCZ group had higher Medicaid enrollment, and the ISA group had more patients with malignancy. Treatment completion rates were comparable (92% each, p  = 1), as were median treatment durations (VCZ: 120 days, ISA: 112 days, p  = 0.95). Adverse event rates were not significantly different (VCZ: 49%, ISA: 60%, p  = 0.18), but CNS-related events occurred more frequently with ISA (16% vs 9%, p  = 0.32). VCZ was associated with lower outpatient pharmacy costs (median $1,596.68 vs $11,000.66, p  < 0.001) and total hospitalization costs (median $40,681.89 vs $121,545.89, p  = 0.01). Malignancy was associated with lower odds of receiving VCZ (OR 0.30, p  = 0.001), and younger age predicted higher odds of treatment incompletion (OR 0.97, p  = 0.035). Female sex was associated with increased adverse event risk. Notably, VCZ use was not associated with increased adverse events or treatment incompletion. Conclusion: VCZ was prescribed five times more frequently than ISA for IA, despite similar treatment durations and completion rates. VCZ was associated with lower costs and did not increase the risk of adverse events or treatment discontinuation. These findings suggest that VCZ remains commonly used and potentially more cost-effective treatment option for IA.https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251347778
spellingShingle Sophea Chan
Laura Leigh Stoudenmire
Xianyan Chen
Duna Zhan
Andrés F. Henao-Martínez
Daniel B. Chastain
Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
title Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
title_full Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
title_fullStr Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
title_full_unstemmed Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
title_short Voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective analysis in a medically insured U.S. population (2017–2020)
title_sort voriconazole versus isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis a retrospective analysis in a medically insured u s population 2017 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361251347778
work_keys_str_mv AT sopheachan voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020
AT lauraleighstoudenmire voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020
AT xianyanchen voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020
AT dunazhan voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020
AT andresfhenaomartinez voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020
AT danielbchastain voriconazoleversusisavuconazoleforinvasiveaspergillosisaretrospectiveanalysisinamedicallyinsureduspopulation20172020