High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform

Objective. The study aimed at investigating the outcome of prostate HIFU focal therapy using the MRI-US fusion platform for treatment localization and delivery. Methods. It is a prospectively designed case series of HIFU focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The inclusion criteria include cli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chi-Hang Yee, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chi-Fai Ng, Chi-Kwok Chan, See-Ming Hou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7157973
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546017839415296
author Chi-Hang Yee
Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Chi-Fai Ng
Chi-Kwok Chan
See-Ming Hou
author_facet Chi-Hang Yee
Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Chi-Fai Ng
Chi-Kwok Chan
See-Ming Hou
author_sort Chi-Hang Yee
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The study aimed at investigating the outcome of prostate HIFU focal therapy using the MRI-US fusion platform for treatment localization and delivery. Methods. It is a prospectively designed case series of HIFU focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The inclusion criteria include clinical tumor stage ≤T2, visible index lesion on multiparametric MRI less than 20 mm in diameter, absence of Gleason 5 pattern on prostate biopsy, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml. HIFU focal therapy was performed in the conventional manner in the beginning 50% of the series, whereas the subsequent cases were performed with MRI-US fusion platform. The primary outcome was treatment failure rate which is defined by the need of salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included tumor recurrence in follow-up biopsy, PSA change, perioperative complications, and postoperative functional outcomes. Results. Twenty patients underwent HIFU focal ablation. HIFU on an MRI-US fusion platform had a trend of a longer total operative time than the conventional counterpart (124.2 min vs. 107.1 min, p=0.066). There was no difference in the mean ablation volume to lesion volume ratio between the two. The mean PSA percentage change from baseline to 6-month is more significant in the conventional group (63.3% vs. 44.6%, p=0.035). No suspicious lesion was seen at 6-month mpMRI in all 20 patients. Two patients, one from each group, eventually underwent radical treatment because of the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in the form of out-of-field recurrences during follow-up biopsy. No significant difference was observed before and after HIFU concerning uroflowmetry, SF-12 score, and EPIC-26 score. It was observed that energy used per volume was positively correlated with PSA density of the patient (r = 0.6364, p=0.014). Conclusion. In conclusion, HIFU with conventional or MRI-US fusion platform provided similar oncological and functional outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-cbefca5d9f6248aa82b2e6cc92eee1ea
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-cbefca5d9f6248aa82b2e6cc92eee1ea2025-02-03T07:24:15ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63772021-01-01202110.1155/2021/7157973High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion PlatformChi-Hang Yee0Peter Ka-Fung Chiu1Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh2Chi-Fai Ng3Chi-Kwok Chan4See-Ming Hou5S. H. Ho Urology CentreS. H. Ho Urology CentreS. H. Ho Urology CentreS. H. Ho Urology CentreS. H. Ho Urology CentreS. H. Ho Urology CentreObjective. The study aimed at investigating the outcome of prostate HIFU focal therapy using the MRI-US fusion platform for treatment localization and delivery. Methods. It is a prospectively designed case series of HIFU focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. The inclusion criteria include clinical tumor stage ≤T2, visible index lesion on multiparametric MRI less than 20 mm in diameter, absence of Gleason 5 pattern on prostate biopsy, and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml. HIFU focal therapy was performed in the conventional manner in the beginning 50% of the series, whereas the subsequent cases were performed with MRI-US fusion platform. The primary outcome was treatment failure rate which is defined by the need of salvage therapy. Secondary outcomes included tumor recurrence in follow-up biopsy, PSA change, perioperative complications, and postoperative functional outcomes. Results. Twenty patients underwent HIFU focal ablation. HIFU on an MRI-US fusion platform had a trend of a longer total operative time than the conventional counterpart (124.2 min vs. 107.1 min, p=0.066). There was no difference in the mean ablation volume to lesion volume ratio between the two. The mean PSA percentage change from baseline to 6-month is more significant in the conventional group (63.3% vs. 44.6%, p=0.035). No suspicious lesion was seen at 6-month mpMRI in all 20 patients. Two patients, one from each group, eventually underwent radical treatment because of the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in the form of out-of-field recurrences during follow-up biopsy. No significant difference was observed before and after HIFU concerning uroflowmetry, SF-12 score, and EPIC-26 score. It was observed that energy used per volume was positively correlated with PSA density of the patient (r = 0.6364, p=0.014). Conclusion. In conclusion, HIFU with conventional or MRI-US fusion platform provided similar oncological and functional outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7157973
spellingShingle Chi-Hang Yee
Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Chi-Fai Ng
Chi-Kwok Chan
See-Ming Hou
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
Advances in Urology
title High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
title_full High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
title_fullStr High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
title_full_unstemmed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
title_short High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer with MRI-US Fusion Platform
title_sort high intensity focused ultrasound hifu focal therapy for localized prostate cancer with mri us fusion platform
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7157973
work_keys_str_mv AT chihangyee highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform
AT peterkafungchiu highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform
AT jeremyyuenchunteoh highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform
AT chifaing highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform
AT chikwokchan highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform
AT seeminghou highintensityfocusedultrasoundhifufocaltherapyforlocalizedprostatecancerwithmriusfusionplatform