Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model
Geometric argumentation has an important role in solving mathematical problems in geometric material, so students must have this ability. Each student has different thoughts, including when stating arguments. Each student's arguments will vary and be at different levels. This study aims to dete...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Indonesian |
| Published: |
Universitas Hamzanwadi
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Elemen |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/jel/article/view/24116 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575432343420928 |
|---|---|
| author | M. Rizky Ramandani Yusuf Hartono Cecil Hiltrimartin Nyimas Aisyah |
| author_facet | M. Rizky Ramandani Yusuf Hartono Cecil Hiltrimartin Nyimas Aisyah |
| author_sort | M. Rizky Ramandani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Geometric argumentation has an important role in solving mathematical problems in geometric material, so students must have this ability. Each student has different thoughts, including when stating arguments. Each student's arguments will vary and be at different levels. This study aims to determine the levels of lower secondary school students' geometric argumentation. This research was conducted in a lower secondary school involving 20 ninth-grade students. Students participating in this study were asked to work on geometry problems related to proof. Through the proofs carried out, the argumentation structure owned by students is visible. The structures of argumentation given by the students were then analysed using Toulmin's model of argumentation. The components of the Toulmin model used consist of claim, data, warrant, and backing. The results of the analysis of the proof prepared by the students stated that some of the students have been able to reach a high level of geometric argumentation and can compile a series of proofs. But not a few of them also have difficulty compiling the proof, have difficulty providing the components of the Toulmin model, and make some mistakes. Errors made by students include symbol writing errors, calculation errors, and others. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cbe1b86857c44c85b5ec7bc2e02d9c1c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2442-4226 |
| language | Indonesian |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Hamzanwadi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Elemen |
| spelling | doaj-art-cbe1b86857c44c85b5ec7bc2e02d9c1c2025-02-01T08:24:40ZindUniversitas HamzanwadiJurnal Elemen2442-42262024-06-0110226027310.29408/jel.v10i2.2411621712Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin modelM. Rizky Ramandani0Yusuf Hartono1Cecil Hiltrimartin2Nyimas Aisyah3Sriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya UniversityGeometric argumentation has an important role in solving mathematical problems in geometric material, so students must have this ability. Each student has different thoughts, including when stating arguments. Each student's arguments will vary and be at different levels. This study aims to determine the levels of lower secondary school students' geometric argumentation. This research was conducted in a lower secondary school involving 20 ninth-grade students. Students participating in this study were asked to work on geometry problems related to proof. Through the proofs carried out, the argumentation structure owned by students is visible. The structures of argumentation given by the students were then analysed using Toulmin's model of argumentation. The components of the Toulmin model used consist of claim, data, warrant, and backing. The results of the analysis of the proof prepared by the students stated that some of the students have been able to reach a high level of geometric argumentation and can compile a series of proofs. But not a few of them also have difficulty compiling the proof, have difficulty providing the components of the Toulmin model, and make some mistakes. Errors made by students include symbol writing errors, calculation errors, and others.https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/jel/article/view/24116geometric argumentationproofstoulmin model |
| spellingShingle | M. Rizky Ramandani Yusuf Hartono Cecil Hiltrimartin Nyimas Aisyah Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model Jurnal Elemen geometric argumentation proofs toulmin model |
| title | Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model |
| title_full | Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model |
| title_fullStr | Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model |
| title_short | Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model |
| title_sort | investigating lower secondary school students geometric argumentation structure using toulmin model |
| topic | geometric argumentation proofs toulmin model |
| url | https://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/jel/article/view/24116 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mrizkyramandani investigatinglowersecondaryschoolstudentsgeometricargumentationstructureusingtoulminmodel AT yusufhartono investigatinglowersecondaryschoolstudentsgeometricargumentationstructureusingtoulminmodel AT cecilhiltrimartin investigatinglowersecondaryschoolstudentsgeometricargumentationstructureusingtoulminmodel AT nyimasaisyah investigatinglowersecondaryschoolstudentsgeometricargumentationstructureusingtoulminmodel |