Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent

ABSTRACT Experiments have shown that predation‐risk effects on prey fitness can be highly contingent on environmental conditions, suggesting a potential difficulty in generalizing risk effects on prey abundance in natural settings. Rather than study the influence of a particular controlled factor, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott D. Peacor, Clayton E. Cressler, Kevin L. Pangle, Alexandra V. Rafalski, Chao Song, Earl E. Werner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70861
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583051329142784
author Scott D. Peacor
Clayton E. Cressler
Kevin L. Pangle
Alexandra V. Rafalski
Chao Song
Earl E. Werner
author_facet Scott D. Peacor
Clayton E. Cressler
Kevin L. Pangle
Alexandra V. Rafalski
Chao Song
Earl E. Werner
author_sort Scott D. Peacor
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Experiments have shown that predation‐risk effects on prey fitness can be highly contingent on environmental conditions, suggesting a potential difficulty in generalizing risk effects on prey abundance in natural settings. Rather than study the influence of a particular controlled factor, we examine the problem with a novel approach. We examined the influence of risk effects in multiple experiments performed under similar study conditions. Any differences in the experiments would typically be deemed incidental, that is, they would not be given attention in methodology, nor be presented as factors affecting results or inferences. Therefore, any differences in the magnitude and direction of risk effects among experiments would indicate that risk effects on prey population abundance are strongly influenced by context in natural communities. The multiple experiments were conducted under similar conditions, objectives, measurables and implementation, and captured much of the complexity of natural systems (e.g., they were performed with diverse prey assemblages (≥ 11 taxa) over multiple prey generations). Our results highlight the potentially profound context dependence of risk effects: risk effects on the density of some zooplankton species varied between a significant negative effect in one experiment to a significant positive effect in another, whereas other species showed significant negative or positive effects in one experiment and no effect in another. We review mechanisms that could underlie risk effects having opposite effects on the same prey. Our findings illustrate that risk effects observed in one study may not hold, even for the same species in the same system.
format Article
id doaj-art-cb880271e37e4dd0b98e058cd63cad8f
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-cb880271e37e4dd0b98e058cd63cad8f2025-01-29T05:08:41ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70861Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly ContingentScott D. Peacor0Clayton E. Cressler1Kevin L. Pangle2Alexandra V. Rafalski3Chao Song4Earl E. Werner5Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USASchool of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska Lincoln Nebraska USADepartment of Biology and Institute of Great Lakes Research Central Michigan University Mount Pleasant Michigan USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USAABSTRACT Experiments have shown that predation‐risk effects on prey fitness can be highly contingent on environmental conditions, suggesting a potential difficulty in generalizing risk effects on prey abundance in natural settings. Rather than study the influence of a particular controlled factor, we examine the problem with a novel approach. We examined the influence of risk effects in multiple experiments performed under similar study conditions. Any differences in the experiments would typically be deemed incidental, that is, they would not be given attention in methodology, nor be presented as factors affecting results or inferences. Therefore, any differences in the magnitude and direction of risk effects among experiments would indicate that risk effects on prey population abundance are strongly influenced by context in natural communities. The multiple experiments were conducted under similar conditions, objectives, measurables and implementation, and captured much of the complexity of natural systems (e.g., they were performed with diverse prey assemblages (≥ 11 taxa) over multiple prey generations). Our results highlight the potentially profound context dependence of risk effects: risk effects on the density of some zooplankton species varied between a significant negative effect in one experiment to a significant positive effect in another, whereas other species showed significant negative or positive effects in one experiment and no effect in another. We review mechanisms that could underlie risk effects having opposite effects on the same prey. Our findings illustrate that risk effects observed in one study may not hold, even for the same species in the same system.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70861context dependentecology of fearLepomisnonconsumptive effectnonlethal effecttrait‐mediated
spellingShingle Scott D. Peacor
Clayton E. Cressler
Kevin L. Pangle
Alexandra V. Rafalski
Chao Song
Earl E. Werner
Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
Ecology and Evolution
context dependent
ecology of fear
Lepomis
nonconsumptive effect
nonlethal effect
trait‐mediated
title Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
title_full Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
title_fullStr Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
title_full_unstemmed Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
title_short Similar Conditions With Opposite Effects: Predation‐Risk Effects on Prey Abundance Are Highly Contingent
title_sort similar conditions with opposite effects predation risk effects on prey abundance are highly contingent
topic context dependent
ecology of fear
Lepomis
nonconsumptive effect
nonlethal effect
trait‐mediated
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70861
work_keys_str_mv AT scottdpeacor similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent
AT claytonecressler similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent
AT kevinlpangle similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent
AT alexandravrafalski similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent
AT chaosong similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent
AT earlewerner similarconditionswithoppositeeffectspredationriskeffectsonpreyabundancearehighlycontingent