Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials

Abstract Introduction Major national and international oncological societies generally recommend treating a significant proportion of oncological patients in clinical trials to improve therapy strategies for cancer patients. At cancer centers, the recommendation about the appropriate therapy for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hendrik Dapper, Maurice Dantes, Peter Herschbach, Hana Algül, Volker Heinemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04559-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595074204041216
author Hendrik Dapper
Maurice Dantes
Peter Herschbach
Hana Algül
Volker Heinemann
author_facet Hendrik Dapper
Maurice Dantes
Peter Herschbach
Hana Algül
Volker Heinemann
author_sort Hendrik Dapper
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Major national and international oncological societies generally recommend treating a significant proportion of oncological patients in clinical trials to improve therapy strategies for cancer patients. At cancer centers, the recommendation about the appropriate therapy for the individual tumor patient is usually made in interdisciplinary case discussions in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT). In this study, we examined the impact of MDTs for the inclusion of patients in therapy trials. Methodology A prospective, explorative study of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM) was conducted at both university hospitals in 2019. In the first phase, various MDTs’ case discussions about oncological situations and their decisions regarding possible therapy trials were recorded in a structured manner. In the second phase, the actual inclusion rates of patients in therapy trials and reasons for non-inclusion were examined. Finally, the data of the respective university hospitals were anonymized, pooled and analyzed. Results A total of 1797 case discussions were reviewed. Therapy recommendations were made in 1527 case presentations. 38 (2.5%) of 1527 patients were already included in a therapy trial at the time of case presentation. The MDTs recommended inclusion of an additional 107 cases (7%), for a therapy trial. Of these patients, 41 were finally enrolled in a therapy trial which resulted in a total recruitment rate of 5.2%. Despite MDTs’ recommendations, 66 patients were not included in a therapy trial. The main reason for non-inclusion was insufficient inclusion or existing exclusion criteria (n = 18, 28%). In 48% of all cases (n = 31), the reason for non-inclusion could not be determined. Conclusion The potential of MDTs as an instrument for the inclusion of patients in therapy trials is high. To increase the enrollment of patients in oncological therapy trials, structural measures such as the central use of trial administration and MTB software in addition to standardized tumor board discussions must be established to ensure a seamless flow of information about actual recruiting trials and the current status of trial participation of patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-cb5fbf90abc84949aedbe8ac8d7fe1cf
institution Kabale University
issn 0171-5216
1432-1335
language English
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
spelling doaj-art-cb5fbf90abc84949aedbe8ac8d7fe1cf2025-01-19T12:08:54ZengSpringerJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology0171-52161432-13352023-03-01149107601760810.1007/s00432-022-04559-0Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trialsHendrik Dapper0Maurice Dantes1Peter Herschbach2Hana Algül3Volker Heinemann4Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University MunichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Munich, LMU MunichComprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University MunichComprehensive Cancer Center München, Institute for Tumor Metabolism, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of MunichDepartment of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Munich, LMU MunichAbstract Introduction Major national and international oncological societies generally recommend treating a significant proportion of oncological patients in clinical trials to improve therapy strategies for cancer patients. At cancer centers, the recommendation about the appropriate therapy for the individual tumor patient is usually made in interdisciplinary case discussions in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT). In this study, we examined the impact of MDTs for the inclusion of patients in therapy trials. Methodology A prospective, explorative study of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM) was conducted at both university hospitals in 2019. In the first phase, various MDTs’ case discussions about oncological situations and their decisions regarding possible therapy trials were recorded in a structured manner. In the second phase, the actual inclusion rates of patients in therapy trials and reasons for non-inclusion were examined. Finally, the data of the respective university hospitals were anonymized, pooled and analyzed. Results A total of 1797 case discussions were reviewed. Therapy recommendations were made in 1527 case presentations. 38 (2.5%) of 1527 patients were already included in a therapy trial at the time of case presentation. The MDTs recommended inclusion of an additional 107 cases (7%), for a therapy trial. Of these patients, 41 were finally enrolled in a therapy trial which resulted in a total recruitment rate of 5.2%. Despite MDTs’ recommendations, 66 patients were not included in a therapy trial. The main reason for non-inclusion was insufficient inclusion or existing exclusion criteria (n = 18, 28%). In 48% of all cases (n = 31), the reason for non-inclusion could not be determined. Conclusion The potential of MDTs as an instrument for the inclusion of patients in therapy trials is high. To increase the enrollment of patients in oncological therapy trials, structural measures such as the central use of trial administration and MTB software in addition to standardized tumor board discussions must be established to ensure a seamless flow of information about actual recruiting trials and the current status of trial participation of patients.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04559-0Tumor boardsOncological clinical trialsPatient recruitment
spellingShingle Hendrik Dapper
Maurice Dantes
Peter Herschbach
Hana Algül
Volker Heinemann
Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Tumor boards
Oncological clinical trials
Patient recruitment
title Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
title_full Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
title_fullStr Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
title_short Relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
title_sort relevance of tumor boards for the inclusion of patients in oncological clinical trials
topic Tumor boards
Oncological clinical trials
Patient recruitment
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04559-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hendrikdapper relevanceoftumorboardsfortheinclusionofpatientsinoncologicalclinicaltrials
AT mauricedantes relevanceoftumorboardsfortheinclusionofpatientsinoncologicalclinicaltrials
AT peterherschbach relevanceoftumorboardsfortheinclusionofpatientsinoncologicalclinicaltrials
AT hanaalgul relevanceoftumorboardsfortheinclusionofpatientsinoncologicalclinicaltrials
AT volkerheinemann relevanceoftumorboardsfortheinclusionofpatientsinoncologicalclinicaltrials