Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are cornerstone methodologies in evidence-based medicine, synthesising vast research to provide comprehensive insights. Despite their value, the increasing prevalence of SRMAs has highlighted the need for robust critical appraisal to ensure their reliabil...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1223_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832087422413832192 |
|---|---|
| author | Kapil D. Soni |
| author_facet | Kapil D. Soni |
| author_sort | Kapil D. Soni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are cornerstone methodologies in evidence-based medicine, synthesising vast research to provide comprehensive insights. Despite their value, the increasing prevalence of SRMAs has highlighted the need for robust critical appraisal to ensure their reliability and applicability. This document outlines a structured framework for evaluating SRMAs, emphasising key elements such as clearly defined research questions, appropriate inclusion criteria, comprehensive search strategies and the assessment of bias in included studies. In addition, it discusses the importance of rigorous data extraction, synthesis methods and evaluation of publication bias. Tools like Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), Measurement Tools to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) can facilitate appraisal and help translate findings into clinical practice. By identifying knowledge gaps and methodological strengths or weaknesses, critical appraisal enhances the quality of SRMAs and safeguards their role in guiding evidence-based decision-making. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-ca6f96d68d114ef4bac4ae4c53304480 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0019-5049 0976-2817 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
| spelling | doaj-art-ca6f96d68d114ef4bac4ae4c533044802025-02-06T05:26:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172025-01-0169116116410.4103/ija.ija_1223_24Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysesKapil D. SoniSystematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) are cornerstone methodologies in evidence-based medicine, synthesising vast research to provide comprehensive insights. Despite their value, the increasing prevalence of SRMAs has highlighted the need for robust critical appraisal to ensure their reliability and applicability. This document outlines a structured framework for evaluating SRMAs, emphasising key elements such as clearly defined research questions, appropriate inclusion criteria, comprehensive search strategies and the assessment of bias in included studies. In addition, it discusses the importance of rigorous data extraction, synthesis methods and evaluation of publication bias. Tools like Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), Measurement Tools to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) can facilitate appraisal and help translate findings into clinical practice. By identifying knowledge gaps and methodological strengths or weaknesses, critical appraisal enhances the quality of SRMAs and safeguards their role in guiding evidence-based decision-making.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1223_24amstarbiascritical appraisalgrademeta-analysesprismasystematic reviews |
| spellingShingle | Kapil D. Soni Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Indian Journal of Anaesthesia amstar bias critical appraisal grade meta-analyses prisma systematic reviews |
| title | Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| title_full | Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| title_fullStr | Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| title_short | Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses |
| title_sort | critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta analyses |
| topic | amstar bias critical appraisal grade meta-analyses prisma systematic reviews |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_1223_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kapildsoni criticalappraisalofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalyses |