Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study

Abstract Background Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and other bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly put into practice. However, studies evaluating the performance of MDTs in this field are scarce. We aimed to assess our MDT for complex BJI by de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaap L.J. Hanssen, Henrica M.J. van der Linden, Martha T. van der Beek, Robert J.P. van der Wal, Marco F. Termaat, Mark G.J. de Boer, Henk Scheper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08329-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595073973354496
author Jaap L.J. Hanssen
Henrica M.J. van der Linden
Martha T. van der Beek
Robert J.P. van der Wal
Marco F. Termaat
Mark G.J. de Boer
Henk Scheper
author_facet Jaap L.J. Hanssen
Henrica M.J. van der Linden
Martha T. van der Beek
Robert J.P. van der Wal
Marco F. Termaat
Mark G.J. de Boer
Henk Scheper
author_sort Jaap L.J. Hanssen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and other bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly put into practice. However, studies evaluating the performance of MDTs in this field are scarce. We aimed to assess our MDT for complex BJI by determining the implementation rate of team decisions, analyzing factors associated with non-implementation and evaluating the clinical outcome of patients in whom MDT decisions were not implemented. Methods An observational study was conducted on all patients with a PJI or other BJI of which the management was discussed during MDT meetings between 2015 and 2022 in a tertiary care academic hospital. Patient characteristics and MDT data were obtained from electronic patient records. The multidisciplinary team consisted of orthopaedic surgeons, trauma surgeons, infectious diseases specialists and clinical microbiologists. A decision was considered not implemented if the patient did not receive the management that was decided by the MDT. Factors possibly associated with non-implementation were statistically analyzed using logistic regression. Results The analysis included 1321 MDT decisions on 509 patients. The overall implementation rate of MDT decisions was 92%. Reasons for non-implementation were disagreement by the treating surgeon with the MDT regarding the optimal treatment (n = 24, 23%), patient preference for a different treatment (n = 19, 18%), new clinical information not yet available during the MDT meeting that made the physician change management (n = 17, 16%) or unknown (n = 45, 43%). Trauma surgeons were more likely to not implement an MDT decision (odds ratio 2.4, p = 0.01) The cure rate of patients who received a different surgical strategy than decided by the MDT was 33%. The cure rate was lower if a patient chose to deviate from the MDT decision (46%) than when the treating physician chose to deviate from the MDT decision (77%). Conclusion The implementation rate of decisions made by our complex BJI MDT was high. Furthermore, the current study suggests that non-implementation of MDT decisions on surgical management and non-implementation initiated by the patient lead to poor clinical outcomes. An analysis of MDT decision implementation is a useful tool to evaluate the impact of MDTs and further improve its quality.
format Article
id doaj-art-c99040332e3b481fad37c5a4ff7969e4
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-c99040332e3b481fad37c5a4ff7969e42025-01-19T12:04:41ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-01-0126111010.1186/s12891-025-08329-0Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational studyJaap L.J. Hanssen0Henrica M.J. van der Linden1Martha T. van der Beek2Robert J.P. van der Wal3Marco F. Termaat4Mark G.J. de Boer5Henk Scheper6Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterAbstract Background Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and other bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly put into practice. However, studies evaluating the performance of MDTs in this field are scarce. We aimed to assess our MDT for complex BJI by determining the implementation rate of team decisions, analyzing factors associated with non-implementation and evaluating the clinical outcome of patients in whom MDT decisions were not implemented. Methods An observational study was conducted on all patients with a PJI or other BJI of which the management was discussed during MDT meetings between 2015 and 2022 in a tertiary care academic hospital. Patient characteristics and MDT data were obtained from electronic patient records. The multidisciplinary team consisted of orthopaedic surgeons, trauma surgeons, infectious diseases specialists and clinical microbiologists. A decision was considered not implemented if the patient did not receive the management that was decided by the MDT. Factors possibly associated with non-implementation were statistically analyzed using logistic regression. Results The analysis included 1321 MDT decisions on 509 patients. The overall implementation rate of MDT decisions was 92%. Reasons for non-implementation were disagreement by the treating surgeon with the MDT regarding the optimal treatment (n = 24, 23%), patient preference for a different treatment (n = 19, 18%), new clinical information not yet available during the MDT meeting that made the physician change management (n = 17, 16%) or unknown (n = 45, 43%). Trauma surgeons were more likely to not implement an MDT decision (odds ratio 2.4, p = 0.01) The cure rate of patients who received a different surgical strategy than decided by the MDT was 33%. The cure rate was lower if a patient chose to deviate from the MDT decision (46%) than when the treating physician chose to deviate from the MDT decision (77%). Conclusion The implementation rate of decisions made by our complex BJI MDT was high. Furthermore, the current study suggests that non-implementation of MDT decisions on surgical management and non-implementation initiated by the patient lead to poor clinical outcomes. An analysis of MDT decision implementation is a useful tool to evaluate the impact of MDTs and further improve its quality.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08329-0Multidisciplinary careProsthetic joint infectionsBone and joint infections
spellingShingle Jaap L.J. Hanssen
Henrica M.J. van der Linden
Martha T. van der Beek
Robert J.P. van der Wal
Marco F. Termaat
Mark G.J. de Boer
Henk Scheper
Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Multidisciplinary care
Prosthetic joint infections
Bone and joint infections
title Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
title_full Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
title_fullStr Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
title_short Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study
title_sort implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections an observational study
topic Multidisciplinary care
Prosthetic joint infections
Bone and joint infections
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08329-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jaapljhanssen implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT henricamjvanderlinden implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT marthatvanderbeek implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT robertjpvanderwal implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT marcoftermaat implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT markgjdeboer implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy
AT henkscheper implementationofmultidisciplinaryteamdecisionsonthemanagementofcomplexboneandjointinfectionsanobservationalstudy