Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws

Judge’s Fundamental judicial supervision on ordinary laws is one of the most important issues in the last decade. The problem is that the judge, in the position of hearing the case and invoking the rule of law, which may have a dual source in the constitution and the ordinary, can act as the basic s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirhossein Alizadeh, Ghasem Alizadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Law 2024-09-01
Series:پژوهشهای حقوقی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_177372_f8d15f93229a31da5977efff001d4156.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591602205327360
author Amirhossein Alizadeh
Ghasem Alizadeh
author_facet Amirhossein Alizadeh
Ghasem Alizadeh
author_sort Amirhossein Alizadeh
collection DOAJ
description Judge’s Fundamental judicial supervision on ordinary laws is one of the most important issues in the last decade. The problem is that the judge, in the position of hearing the case and invoking the rule of law, which may have a dual source in the constitution and the ordinary, can act as the basic supervisor of the ordinary law and set it aside? The new viewpoint is based on the theory of the attainment of the right and jurisdiction of the Judiciary. According to this view, the patterns of fundamental rules are based on the generality and foundations of the legal system and derive from all the effective norms affecting it and protecting the fundamental rights of individuals, and the judge as a selector person, due to the sources of right, selects the justice verified rule and settles the lawsuit. In this view, the legal rules are subject to the basic duty of the Judiciary in such a way that the judge refuses to enforce them in dealing with laws that are contrary to the reference and fundamental norms. This non-enforcement has a negative character and cannot be used to repeal the law. In this view, the dominance of the legal aspect of political supervision is not only in conflict with the theory of separation of powers, but also in line with its goals and the rule of law.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9248ffea46c456495c9bcf42d53d638
institution Kabale University
issn 1682-9220
2717-0020
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Shahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Law
record_format Article
series پژوهشهای حقوقی
spelling doaj-art-c9248ffea46c456495c9bcf42d53d6382025-01-22T10:12:32ZengShahr-e- Danesh Research And Study Institute of Lawپژوهشهای حقوقی1682-92202717-00202024-09-01235947951010.48300/jlr.2023.404238.2374177372Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary LawsAmirhossein Alizadeh0Ghasem Alizadeh1PhD in Private Law, Faculty of Law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.PhD Student in Public Law, Faculty of Law, Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran.Judge’s Fundamental judicial supervision on ordinary laws is one of the most important issues in the last decade. The problem is that the judge, in the position of hearing the case and invoking the rule of law, which may have a dual source in the constitution and the ordinary, can act as the basic supervisor of the ordinary law and set it aside? The new viewpoint is based on the theory of the attainment of the right and jurisdiction of the Judiciary. According to this view, the patterns of fundamental rules are based on the generality and foundations of the legal system and derive from all the effective norms affecting it and protecting the fundamental rights of individuals, and the judge as a selector person, due to the sources of right, selects the justice verified rule and settles the lawsuit. In this view, the legal rules are subject to the basic duty of the Judiciary in such a way that the judge refuses to enforce them in dealing with laws that are contrary to the reference and fundamental norms. This non-enforcement has a negative character and cannot be used to repeal the law. In this view, the dominance of the legal aspect of political supervision is not only in conflict with the theory of separation of powers, but also in line with its goals and the rule of law.https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_177372_f8d15f93229a31da5977efff001d4156.pdffundamental supervisionthe rightseparation of powersthe judiciaryjudgeordinary law
spellingShingle Amirhossein Alizadeh
Ghasem Alizadeh
Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
پژوهشهای حقوقی
fundamental supervision
the right
separation of powers
the judiciary
judge
ordinary law
title Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
title_full Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
title_fullStr Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
title_full_unstemmed Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
title_short Attainment of the Right Theory; A Window to the Justifiability of judges' Supervision on Ordinary Laws
title_sort attainment of the right theory a window to the justifiability of judges supervision on ordinary laws
topic fundamental supervision
the right
separation of powers
the judiciary
judge
ordinary law
url https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_177372_f8d15f93229a31da5977efff001d4156.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amirhosseinalizadeh attainmentoftherighttheoryawindowtothejustifiabilityofjudgessupervisiononordinarylaws
AT ghasemalizadeh attainmentoftherighttheoryawindowtothejustifiabilityofjudgessupervisiononordinarylaws