Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction

This article examines the law-state relationship in the modern state by comparing the ideas of Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. In this context, firstly, what modern law is and where its differences emerge from will be discussed. Then, the article examines Hans Kelsen's conceptualization of '...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Erdal Kurğan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi 2023-10-01
Series:Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3293798
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570659143680000
author Erdal Kurğan
author_facet Erdal Kurğan
author_sort Erdal Kurğan
collection DOAJ
description This article examines the law-state relationship in the modern state by comparing the ideas of Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. In this context, firstly, what modern law is and where its differences emerge from will be discussed. Then, the article examines Hans Kelsen's conceptualization of 'Grundnorm', which created the constitution(s) in the modern state(s), as a source of legitimacy in the modern state. The law-state relationship that Kelsen builds on the basis of his 'Pure Theory of Law' is compared to the situation in which Carl Schmitt considers law as the 'decision' of the sovereign. Although Kelsen has accepted law as thing-in-itself and intensified his efforts to build an objective science, the juridical science presents a legitimacy in factual order; even if it was not Kelsen’s goal. Kelsen, however, neglects what is political and failed to examine the appearance of factual order or law in practical social order and their relationship. On the other hand, Schmitt did not much get closer to Kelsen’s approach- building the law with Grundnorm- with his emphasis on sovereignty as the constituent will and unique source of legitimacy. Over what is political and political unity, Schmitt’s approach is based on factual order by defining the law over extraordinary “decision” of the sovereign which is identical with the society/people. The approach to understand the modern state in this article both attaches importance to the Kelsen’s emphasis on the juridical science and attaches equivalent value to the notion of sovereignty which Schmitt rightfully developed. In the last part, this article argues that the law-state relationship in the modern state emerged with both Grundnorm and 'sovereignty', that is, in the partnership of both.
format Article
id doaj-art-c8f9dff8c9634b9697b77355da1fabd0
institution Kabale University
issn 1303-1279
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
record_format Article
series Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-c8f9dff8c9634b9697b77355da1fabd02025-02-02T14:34:16ZengSivas Cumhuriyet ÜniversitesiCumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi1303-12792023-10-0124464665810.37880/cumuiibf.13343392057Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical IntroductionErdal Kurğan0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-2804MARMARA UNIVERSITYThis article examines the law-state relationship in the modern state by comparing the ideas of Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. In this context, firstly, what modern law is and where its differences emerge from will be discussed. Then, the article examines Hans Kelsen's conceptualization of 'Grundnorm', which created the constitution(s) in the modern state(s), as a source of legitimacy in the modern state. The law-state relationship that Kelsen builds on the basis of his 'Pure Theory of Law' is compared to the situation in which Carl Schmitt considers law as the 'decision' of the sovereign. Although Kelsen has accepted law as thing-in-itself and intensified his efforts to build an objective science, the juridical science presents a legitimacy in factual order; even if it was not Kelsen’s goal. Kelsen, however, neglects what is political and failed to examine the appearance of factual order or law in practical social order and their relationship. On the other hand, Schmitt did not much get closer to Kelsen’s approach- building the law with Grundnorm- with his emphasis on sovereignty as the constituent will and unique source of legitimacy. Over what is political and political unity, Schmitt’s approach is based on factual order by defining the law over extraordinary “decision” of the sovereign which is identical with the society/people. The approach to understand the modern state in this article both attaches importance to the Kelsen’s emphasis on the juridical science and attaches equivalent value to the notion of sovereignty which Schmitt rightfully developed. In the last part, this article argues that the law-state relationship in the modern state emerged with both Grundnorm and 'sovereignty', that is, in the partnership of both.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3293798grundnormegemenlikegemenin kararısaf hukuk kuramıgrundnormsovereigntypure theory of lawdecision
spellingShingle Erdal Kurğan
Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
grundnorm
egemenlik
egemenin kararı
saf hukuk kuramı
grundnorm
sovereignty
pure theory of law
decision
title Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
title_full Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
title_fullStr Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
title_short Rethinking State-Law Relations Through the Kelsen-Schmitt Debate: A Critical Introduction
title_sort rethinking state law relations through the kelsen schmitt debate a critical introduction
topic grundnorm
egemenlik
egemenin kararı
saf hukuk kuramı
grundnorm
sovereignty
pure theory of law
decision
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3293798
work_keys_str_mv AT erdalkurgan rethinkingstatelawrelationsthroughthekelsenschmittdebateacriticalintroduction