Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys

Abstract Background Accurate surveillance data are critical for addressing tick and tick-borne pathogen risk to human and animal health. Current surveillance methods for detecting invading or expanding tick species are limited in their ability to scale efficiently to state or national levels. In thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Troy Koser, Aimee Hurt, Laura Thompson, Alyson Courtemanch, Benjamin Wise, Paul Cross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06519-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850217169664606208
author Troy Koser
Aimee Hurt
Laura Thompson
Alyson Courtemanch
Benjamin Wise
Paul Cross
author_facet Troy Koser
Aimee Hurt
Laura Thompson
Alyson Courtemanch
Benjamin Wise
Paul Cross
author_sort Troy Koser
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Accurate surveillance data are critical for addressing tick and tick-borne pathogen risk to human and animal health. Current surveillance methods for detecting invading or expanding tick species are limited in their ability to scale efficiently to state or national levels. In this study we explored the potential use of scent detection dogs to assist field surveys for a hard tick species: Dermacentor albipictus. Methods We used a series of indoor and in situ training simulations to teach scent detection dogs to recognize D. albipictus scent, distinguish tick scent from associated vegetation, and develop a cautious search pattern. After training, we deployed both a scent detection dog survey team and a human-only survey team on transect and surveillance plot surveys then compared the detection rates and efficiency of both methods. Results Scent detection dogs required more time and money to train on field surveys but were comparable to traditional tick drags when accounting for cost per unit area surveyed. There was a lack of agreement on positive (ticks present) versus negative (ticks not present) sites between the two methods, implying that neither method is particularly reliable at detecting D. albipictus. Conclusions Estimating detection bias and false negative rates for tick surveillance methods such as tick drags will be important for accurately evaluating tick-borne disease risk across space and into the future. We found scent detection dogs to be a reasonable alternative sampling approach to consider when ticks are at low abundance or patchily distributed such as during tick range expansion or novel invasions. Scent detection dogs may also be useful for sampling for ticks in areas or along surfaces that are difficult to sample with the traditional tick drag technique like at ports of entry or livestock competitions. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-c8c2363de9e5431492e0a7364ac2147c
institution OA Journals
issn 1756-3305
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Parasites & Vectors
spelling doaj-art-c8c2363de9e5431492e0a7364ac2147c2025-08-20T02:08:08ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052025-04-0118111010.1186/s13071-024-06519-8Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveysTroy Koser0Aimee Hurt1Laura Thompson2Alyson Courtemanch3Benjamin Wise4Paul Cross5Montana State UniversityWorking Dogs for ConservationNational Climate Adaptation Science Center, U.S. Geological SurveyWyoming Game and Fish DepartmentWyoming Game and Fish DepartmentNorthern Rocky Mountain Science Center, U.S. Geological SurveyAbstract Background Accurate surveillance data are critical for addressing tick and tick-borne pathogen risk to human and animal health. Current surveillance methods for detecting invading or expanding tick species are limited in their ability to scale efficiently to state or national levels. In this study we explored the potential use of scent detection dogs to assist field surveys for a hard tick species: Dermacentor albipictus. Methods We used a series of indoor and in situ training simulations to teach scent detection dogs to recognize D. albipictus scent, distinguish tick scent from associated vegetation, and develop a cautious search pattern. After training, we deployed both a scent detection dog survey team and a human-only survey team on transect and surveillance plot surveys then compared the detection rates and efficiency of both methods. Results Scent detection dogs required more time and money to train on field surveys but were comparable to traditional tick drags when accounting for cost per unit area surveyed. There was a lack of agreement on positive (ticks present) versus negative (ticks not present) sites between the two methods, implying that neither method is particularly reliable at detecting D. albipictus. Conclusions Estimating detection bias and false negative rates for tick surveillance methods such as tick drags will be important for accurately evaluating tick-borne disease risk across space and into the future. We found scent detection dogs to be a reasonable alternative sampling approach to consider when ticks are at low abundance or patchily distributed such as during tick range expansion or novel invasions. Scent detection dogs may also be useful for sampling for ticks in areas or along surfaces that are difficult to sample with the traditional tick drag technique like at ports of entry or livestock competitions. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06519-8Alces alcesDermacentor albipictusGreater yellowstone ecosystemHard ticksMooseScent detection dogs
spellingShingle Troy Koser
Aimee Hurt
Laura Thompson
Alyson Courtemanch
Benjamin Wise
Paul Cross
Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
Parasites & Vectors
Alces alces
Dermacentor albipictus
Greater yellowstone ecosystem
Hard ticks
Moose
Scent detection dogs
title Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
title_full Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
title_fullStr Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
title_full_unstemmed Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
title_short Scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick, Dermacentor albipictus, with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
title_sort scent detection dogs detect a species of hard tick dermacentor albipictus with comparable accuracy and efficiency to traditional tick drag surveys
topic Alces alces
Dermacentor albipictus
Greater yellowstone ecosystem
Hard ticks
Moose
Scent detection dogs
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06519-8
work_keys_str_mv AT troykoser scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys
AT aimeehurt scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys
AT laurathompson scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys
AT alysoncourtemanch scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys
AT benjaminwise scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys
AT paulcross scentdetectiondogsdetectaspeciesofhardtickdermacentoralbipictuswithcomparableaccuracyandefficiencytotraditionaltickdragsurveys