The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Background/Aim. Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been declining. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatomirović Željka, Škuletić Vesna, Tufegdžić Ivana, Tomić Ljiljana, Džambas Jelena, Tarabar Dino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade 2017-01-01
Series:Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2017/0042-84501600115T.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850236028349054976
author Tatomirović Željka
Škuletić Vesna
Tufegdžić Ivana
Tomić Ljiljana
Džambas Jelena
Tarabar Dino
author_facet Tatomirović Željka
Škuletić Vesna
Tufegdžić Ivana
Tomić Ljiljana
Džambas Jelena
Tarabar Dino
author_sort Tatomirović Željka
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aim. Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been declining. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection. Methods. This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of colorectal region during colonoscopy. In 166 patients concomitant biopsy specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as well. A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic procedures. Results. Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.7%) patients: in 109 (65.7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.4%) benign lesion, so there was no need for resection of the intestine. In 6 (3.6%) of the patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen was malignant. In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy. The sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.9% and 78.3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.083). Both methods had specificity and positive predictive values 100%. Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and 37.8%, respectively. The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.2% and 80.8%, respectively. The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.8% which was significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.001), but not than sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.102). Conclusion. Brush cytology could be a routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy. Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7ed5f4eaef54fc1a88b39d2c1ef1aaa
institution OA Journals
issn 0042-8450
2406-0720
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Vojnosanitetski Pregled
spelling doaj-art-c7ed5f4eaef54fc1a88b39d2c1ef1aaa2025-08-20T02:02:04ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502406-07202017-01-0174765966510.2298/VSP160112115T0042-84501600115TThe value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancerTatomirović Željka0Škuletić Vesna1Tufegdžić Ivana2Tomić Ljiljana3Džambas Jelena4Tarabar Dino5Military Medical Academy, Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Belgrade + University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, BelgradeMilitary Medical Academy, Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Belgrade + University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, BelgradeMilitary Medical Academy, Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Belgrade + University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, BelgradeMilitary Medical Academy, Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, BelgradeMilitary Medical Academy, Institute of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, BelgradeUniversity of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade + Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, BelgradeBackground/Aim. Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been declining. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection. Methods. This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of colorectal region during colonoscopy. In 166 patients concomitant biopsy specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as well. A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic procedures. Results. Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.7%) patients: in 109 (65.7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.4%) benign lesion, so there was no need for resection of the intestine. In 6 (3.6%) of the patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen was malignant. In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy. The sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.9% and 78.3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.083). Both methods had specificity and positive predictive values 100%. Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and 37.8%, respectively. The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.2% and 80.8%, respectively. The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.8% which was significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.001), but not than sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.102). Conclusion. Brush cytology could be a routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy. Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further diagnostic and therapeutic approach.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2017/0042-84501600115T.pdfcolorectal neoplasmsadenocarcinomadiagnosisbiopsycytological techniquessensitivity and specificity
spellingShingle Tatomirović Željka
Škuletić Vesna
Tufegdžić Ivana
Tomić Ljiljana
Džambas Jelena
Tarabar Dino
The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Vojnosanitetski Pregled
colorectal neoplasms
adenocarcinoma
diagnosis
biopsy
cytological techniques
sensitivity and specificity
title The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
title_full The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
title_fullStr The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
title_short The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
title_sort value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
topic colorectal neoplasms
adenocarcinoma
diagnosis
biopsy
cytological techniques
sensitivity and specificity
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2017/0042-84501600115T.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tatomiroviczeljka thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT skuleticvesna thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tufegdzicivana thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tomicljiljana thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT dzambasjelena thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tarabardino thevalueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tatomiroviczeljka valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT skuleticvesna valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tufegdzicivana valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tomicljiljana valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT dzambasjelena valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer
AT tarabardino valueofbrushcytologyandbiopsyforthediagnosisofcolorectalcancer