Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

<h4>Objective</h4>Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yijiang Han, Zhaobo Xia, Shikun Guo, Xiangbo Yu, Zhongrong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170421
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849682883862593536
author Yijiang Han
Zhaobo Xia
Shikun Guo
Xiangbo Yu
Zhongrong Li
author_facet Yijiang Han
Zhaobo Xia
Shikun Guo
Xiangbo Yu
Zhongrong Li
author_sort Yijiang Han
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare these two approaches in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to August 2016. Both randomized and non-randomized studies, assessing LAARP and PSARP in pediatric patients with high/intermediate ARMs, were included. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and total postoperative complications. The second outcome measures were rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, wound infection/dehiscence, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score, and Krickenbeck classification. The quality of the randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro.<h4>Results</h4>From 332 retrieved articles, 1, 1, and 8 of randomized control, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The randomized clinical trial was judged to be of low risk of bias, and the nine cohort studies were of moderate to high quality. 191 and 169 pediatric participants had undergone LAARP and PSARP, respectively. Shorter hospital stays, less wound infection/dehiscence, higher anal canal resting pressure, and a lower incidence of grade 2 or 3 constipation were obtained after LAARP compared with PSARP group values. Besides, the LAARP group had marginally less total postoperative complications. However, the result of operative time was inconclusive; meanwhile, there was no significant difference in rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score and Krickenbeck classification.<h4>Conclusion</h4>For pediatric patients with high/intermediate anorectal malformations, LAARP is a better option compared with PSARP. However, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.
format Article
id doaj-art-c7b51a51d4f04591bbe13300c6220658
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-c7b51a51d4f04591bbe13300c62206582025-08-20T03:24:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e017042110.1371/journal.pone.0170421Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yijiang HanZhaobo XiaShikun GuoXiangbo YuZhongrong Li<h4>Objective</h4>Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare these two approaches in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to August 2016. Both randomized and non-randomized studies, assessing LAARP and PSARP in pediatric patients with high/intermediate ARMs, were included. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and total postoperative complications. The second outcome measures were rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, wound infection/dehiscence, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score, and Krickenbeck classification. The quality of the randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro.<h4>Results</h4>From 332 retrieved articles, 1, 1, and 8 of randomized control, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The randomized clinical trial was judged to be of low risk of bias, and the nine cohort studies were of moderate to high quality. 191 and 169 pediatric participants had undergone LAARP and PSARP, respectively. Shorter hospital stays, less wound infection/dehiscence, higher anal canal resting pressure, and a lower incidence of grade 2 or 3 constipation were obtained after LAARP compared with PSARP group values. Besides, the LAARP group had marginally less total postoperative complications. However, the result of operative time was inconclusive; meanwhile, there was no significant difference in rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score and Krickenbeck classification.<h4>Conclusion</h4>For pediatric patients with high/intermediate anorectal malformations, LAARP is a better option compared with PSARP. However, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170421
spellingShingle Yijiang Han
Zhaobo Xia
Shikun Guo
Xiangbo Yu
Zhongrong Li
Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_fullStr Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_short Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_sort laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull through versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170421
work_keys_str_mv AT yijianghan laparoscopicallyassistedanorectalpullthroughversusposteriorsagittalanorectoplastyforhighandintermediateanorectalmalformationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaoboxia laparoscopicallyassistedanorectalpullthroughversusposteriorsagittalanorectoplastyforhighandintermediateanorectalmalformationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shikunguo laparoscopicallyassistedanorectalpullthroughversusposteriorsagittalanorectoplastyforhighandintermediateanorectalmalformationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiangboyu laparoscopicallyassistedanorectalpullthroughversusposteriorsagittalanorectoplastyforhighandintermediateanorectalmalformationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongrongli laparoscopicallyassistedanorectalpullthroughversusposteriorsagittalanorectoplastyforhighandintermediateanorectalmalformationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis