Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study

Porous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak, Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham, Mohd Ambar Yarmo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552046291582976
author Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham
Mohd Ambar Yarmo
author_facet Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham
Mohd Ambar Yarmo
author_sort Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
collection DOAJ
description Porous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4 removed all the water molecules in the biomass and left the porous carbon without emitting any gaseous byproducts. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface analysis has shown that bamboo-based carbon has good properties with higher surface area (507.8 m2/g), micropore area (393.3 m2/g), and better thermal behavior (compared to FP and EFB) without any activation or treatment process. By acid treatment of biomass, it was shown that higher carbon composition obtained from FP (85.30%), bamboo (77.72%), and EFB (76.55%) is compared to carbon from carbonization process. Under optimal sulfuric acid (20 wt.%) uses, high carbon yield has been achieved for FP (47.85 wt.%), bamboo (62.4 wt.%), and EFB (55.4 wt.%).
format Article
id doaj-art-c7a983d5526448bf942fbe28090c1b14
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-9063
2090-9071
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-c7a983d5526448bf942fbe28090c1b142025-02-03T05:59:52ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90632090-90712013-01-01201310.1155/2013/620346620346Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison StudyWan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak0Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham1Mohd Ambar Yarmo2Low Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaLow Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaLow Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaPorous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4 removed all the water molecules in the biomass and left the porous carbon without emitting any gaseous byproducts. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface analysis has shown that bamboo-based carbon has good properties with higher surface area (507.8 m2/g), micropore area (393.3 m2/g), and better thermal behavior (compared to FP and EFB) without any activation or treatment process. By acid treatment of biomass, it was shown that higher carbon composition obtained from FP (85.30%), bamboo (77.72%), and EFB (76.55%) is compared to carbon from carbonization process. Under optimal sulfuric acid (20 wt.%) uses, high carbon yield has been achieved for FP (47.85 wt.%), bamboo (62.4 wt.%), and EFB (55.4 wt.%).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346
spellingShingle Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham
Mohd Ambar Yarmo
Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
Journal of Chemistry
title Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
title_full Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
title_short Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
title_sort highly porous carbon materials from biomass by chemical and carbonization method a comparison study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346
work_keys_str_mv AT wannorroslamwanisahak highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy
AT mohamedwahabmahamedhisham highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy
AT mohdambaryarmo highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy