Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study
Porous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Chemistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832552046291582976 |
---|---|
author | Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham Mohd Ambar Yarmo |
author_facet | Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham Mohd Ambar Yarmo |
author_sort | Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Porous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4 removed all the water molecules in the biomass and left the porous carbon without emitting any gaseous byproducts. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface analysis has shown that bamboo-based carbon has good properties with higher surface area (507.8 m2/g), micropore area (393.3 m2/g), and better thermal behavior (compared to FP and EFB) without any activation or treatment process. By acid treatment of biomass, it was shown that higher carbon composition obtained from FP (85.30%), bamboo (77.72%), and EFB (76.55%) is compared to carbon from carbonization process. Under optimal sulfuric acid (20 wt.%) uses, high carbon yield has been achieved for FP (47.85 wt.%), bamboo (62.4 wt.%), and EFB (55.4 wt.%). |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-c7a983d5526448bf942fbe28090c1b14 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-9063 2090-9071 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Chemistry |
spelling | doaj-art-c7a983d5526448bf942fbe28090c1b142025-02-03T05:59:52ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90632090-90712013-01-01201310.1155/2013/620346620346Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison StudyWan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak0Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham1Mohd Ambar Yarmo2Low Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaLow Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaLow Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaPorous carbon obtained by dehydrating agent, concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4), from biomass containing high cellulose (filter paper (FP), bamboo waste, and empty fruit bunches (EFB)) shows very high surface area and better thermal behavior. At room temperature (without heating), treatment of H2SO4 removed all the water molecules in the biomass and left the porous carbon without emitting any gaseous byproducts. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface analysis has shown that bamboo-based carbon has good properties with higher surface area (507.8 m2/g), micropore area (393.3 m2/g), and better thermal behavior (compared to FP and EFB) without any activation or treatment process. By acid treatment of biomass, it was shown that higher carbon composition obtained from FP (85.30%), bamboo (77.72%), and EFB (76.55%) is compared to carbon from carbonization process. Under optimal sulfuric acid (20 wt.%) uses, high carbon yield has been achieved for FP (47.85 wt.%), bamboo (62.4 wt.%), and EFB (55.4 wt.%).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346 |
spellingShingle | Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak Mohamed Wahab Mahamed Hisham Mohd Ambar Yarmo Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study Journal of Chemistry |
title | Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study |
title_full | Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study |
title_short | Highly Porous Carbon Materials from Biomass by Chemical and Carbonization Method: A Comparison Study |
title_sort | highly porous carbon materials from biomass by chemical and carbonization method a comparison study |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/620346 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wannorroslamwanisahak highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy AT mohamedwahabmahamedhisham highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy AT mohdambaryarmo highlyporouscarbonmaterialsfrombiomassbychemicalandcarbonizationmethodacomparisonstudy |