Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students
Background: Food insecurity on college campuses is a pressing issue, yet the ways in which students manage challenges and disruptions to their food security status (FSS) are poorly understood. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine knowledge of food insecurity as a concept, evaluate...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Current Developments in Nutrition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024636 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832590913458667520 |
|---|---|
| author | Emily Sklar Gwen M Chodur Leslie Kemp Deborah S Fetter Rachel E Scherr |
| author_facet | Emily Sklar Gwen M Chodur Leslie Kemp Deborah S Fetter Rachel E Scherr |
| author_sort | Emily Sklar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Food insecurity on college campuses is a pressing issue, yet the ways in which students manage challenges and disruptions to their food security status (FSS) are poorly understood. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine knowledge of food insecurity as a concept, evaluate FSS, identify food acquisition-related behaviors, and determine whether these behaviors differ among FSS. Methods: University students at increased risk of experiencing food insecurity (n = 43) were recruited for this mixed-methods study. Participants were surveyed about their FSS, coping strategies, and use of food access resources. Subsequent interviews occurred to evaluate their understanding of food insecurity as a concept and related food acquisition behaviors. The total number of coping strategies and food access resources used were quantified, and composite variables were created. Differences based on FSS classification were examined through regression analyses. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using concurrent triangulation. Results: Despite targeted recruitment efforts, 76% of participants were classified as food secure by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM). Participants were able to define food insecurity and identify circumstances that could contribute to an individual becoming food insecure. However, many participants described experiences that suggested the USDA AFSSM may not accurately capture students' true FSS. Most individuals faced significant challenges in maintaining food security. Participants used a series of coping strategies and food access resources to maintain or improve their food security, regardless of FSS, which included couponing, strategizing when food was low, and sharing food with housemates. Additionally, participants expressed concerns that their use of food access resources may deprive others with greater need. Conclusions: Results from this study shed insight on the complexities of food insecurity in the university setting, providing useful data to inform the development of better programs, outreach, and evaluation tools that encapsulate the many unique factors that make up FSS for students. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c782a25c37e94335becd6458f35c76e9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2475-2991 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Current Developments in Nutrition |
| spelling | doaj-art-c782a25c37e94335becd6458f35c76e92025-01-23T05:27:34ZengElsevierCurrent Developments in Nutrition2475-29912025-01-0191104529Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University StudentsEmily Sklar0Gwen M Chodur1Leslie Kemp2Deborah S Fetter3Rachel E Scherr4Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States; Aggie Compass Basic Needs Resource Center, Davis, CA, United StatesAggie Compass Basic Needs Resource Center, Davis, CA, United StatesAggie Compass Basic Needs Resource Center, Davis, CA, United StatesDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United StatesThe Family, Interiors, Nutrition & Apparel (FINA) Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States; Scherr Nutrition Science Consulting, LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States; Corresponding author.Background: Food insecurity on college campuses is a pressing issue, yet the ways in which students manage challenges and disruptions to their food security status (FSS) are poorly understood. Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine knowledge of food insecurity as a concept, evaluate FSS, identify food acquisition-related behaviors, and determine whether these behaviors differ among FSS. Methods: University students at increased risk of experiencing food insecurity (n = 43) were recruited for this mixed-methods study. Participants were surveyed about their FSS, coping strategies, and use of food access resources. Subsequent interviews occurred to evaluate their understanding of food insecurity as a concept and related food acquisition behaviors. The total number of coping strategies and food access resources used were quantified, and composite variables were created. Differences based on FSS classification were examined through regression analyses. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using concurrent triangulation. Results: Despite targeted recruitment efforts, 76% of participants were classified as food secure by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM). Participants were able to define food insecurity and identify circumstances that could contribute to an individual becoming food insecure. However, many participants described experiences that suggested the USDA AFSSM may not accurately capture students' true FSS. Most individuals faced significant challenges in maintaining food security. Participants used a series of coping strategies and food access resources to maintain or improve their food security, regardless of FSS, which included couponing, strategizing when food was low, and sharing food with housemates. Additionally, participants expressed concerns that their use of food access resources may deprive others with greater need. Conclusions: Results from this study shed insight on the complexities of food insecurity in the university setting, providing useful data to inform the development of better programs, outreach, and evaluation tools that encapsulate the many unique factors that make up FSS for students.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024636food insecuritycoping mechanismsUSDA AFSSMcollege studentsfood access barriers |
| spellingShingle | Emily Sklar Gwen M Chodur Leslie Kemp Deborah S Fetter Rachel E Scherr Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students Current Developments in Nutrition food insecurity coping mechanisms USDA AFSSM college students food access barriers |
| title | Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students |
| title_full | Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students |
| title_fullStr | Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students |
| title_full_unstemmed | Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students |
| title_short | Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students |
| title_sort | food acquisition coping strategies vary based on food security among university students |
| topic | food insecurity coping mechanisms USDA AFSSM college students food access barriers |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024636 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT emilysklar foodacquisitioncopingstrategiesvarybasedonfoodsecurityamonguniversitystudents AT gwenmchodur foodacquisitioncopingstrategiesvarybasedonfoodsecurityamonguniversitystudents AT lesliekemp foodacquisitioncopingstrategiesvarybasedonfoodsecurityamonguniversitystudents AT deborahsfetter foodacquisitioncopingstrategiesvarybasedonfoodsecurityamonguniversitystudents AT rachelescherr foodacquisitioncopingstrategiesvarybasedonfoodsecurityamonguniversitystudents |