Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique

Recently, some phenotypic features of Middle Neolithic populations, observed on series from old archaeological excavations, have been challenged. In order to characterize skeleton size and shape variability of Middle Neolithic individuals, we studied the osteological series from the necropolis of po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aude Civetta, Aurore Schmitt, Bérangère Saliba-serre, Jean-Luc Gisclon, Gilles Loison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 2009-12-01
Series:Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/6543
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579929448906752
author Aude Civetta
Aurore Schmitt
Bérangère Saliba-serre
Jean-Luc Gisclon
Gilles Loison
author_facet Aude Civetta
Aurore Schmitt
Bérangère Saliba-serre
Jean-Luc Gisclon
Gilles Loison
author_sort Aude Civetta
collection DOAJ
description Recently, some phenotypic features of Middle Neolithic populations, observed on series from old archaeological excavations, have been challenged. In order to characterize skeleton size and shape variability of Middle Neolithic individuals, we studied the osteological series from the necropolis of pontcharaud 2; this site is dated from the second half of the 5th millenium and located in the “Massif central”.Concerning the skull dimensions, differences between sexes are weak. The values of indexes are more homogeneous in males than in females. Concerning the long bones dimensions, sexual dimorphism is rather pronounced and most of males are robust.This series was compared to the collection of one from Le Crès, a contemporary settlement in south of France. Sexual dimorphism of this group follows the same trend than the one of Pontcharaud 2. The format of the long bones best distinguishes the two series, especially in females. Differences in shape, expressed by pilastric and platycnemic indexes, are probably related to the way of life that induces different type of mobility and physical activities.The present study showed unexpected metric features for Middle Neolithic populations: pronounced post-cranial sexual dimorphism, males’ robustness and high variability of statures. However, it is necessary to complete this research by studying non metric anatomical variation on the one hand and diet by stable isotopic analysis on the other hand; this will allow us to precise and interpret the differences between both series.
format Article
id doaj-art-c780a4c35ca04676b8f5188e28852c62
institution Kabale University
issn 1777-5469
language English
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher Société d'Anthropologie de Paris
record_format Article
series Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
spelling doaj-art-c780a4c35ca04676b8f5188e28852c622025-01-30T11:27:41ZengSociété d'Anthropologie de ParisBulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris1777-54692009-12-0121414115810.4000/bmsap.6543Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométriqueAude CivettaAurore SchmittBérangère Saliba-serreJean-Luc GisclonGilles LoisonRecently, some phenotypic features of Middle Neolithic populations, observed on series from old archaeological excavations, have been challenged. In order to characterize skeleton size and shape variability of Middle Neolithic individuals, we studied the osteological series from the necropolis of pontcharaud 2; this site is dated from the second half of the 5th millenium and located in the “Massif central”.Concerning the skull dimensions, differences between sexes are weak. The values of indexes are more homogeneous in males than in females. Concerning the long bones dimensions, sexual dimorphism is rather pronounced and most of males are robust.This series was compared to the collection of one from Le Crès, a contemporary settlement in south of France. Sexual dimorphism of this group follows the same trend than the one of Pontcharaud 2. The format of the long bones best distinguishes the two series, especially in females. Differences in shape, expressed by pilastric and platycnemic indexes, are probably related to the way of life that induces different type of mobility and physical activities.The present study showed unexpected metric features for Middle Neolithic populations: pronounced post-cranial sexual dimorphism, males’ robustness and high variability of statures. However, it is necessary to complete this research by studying non metric anatomical variation on the one hand and diet by stable isotopic analysis on the other hand; this will allow us to precise and interpret the differences between both series.https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/6543sexual dimorphismshapebiometrymiddle Neolithicsize
spellingShingle Aude Civetta
Aurore Schmitt
Bérangère Saliba-serre
Jean-Luc Gisclon
Gilles Loison
Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
sexual dimorphism
shape
biometry
middle Neolithic
size
title Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
title_full Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
title_fullStr Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
title_full_unstemmed Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
title_short Comparaison de deux « populations » de la deuxième moitié du Ve millénaire avant notre ère : approche anthropométrique
title_sort comparaison de deux populations de la deuxieme moitie du ve millenaire avant notre ere approche anthropometrique
topic sexual dimorphism
shape
biometry
middle Neolithic
size
url https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/6543
work_keys_str_mv AT audecivetta comparaisondedeuxpopulationsdeladeuxiememoitieduvemillenaireavantnotreereapprocheanthropometrique
AT auroreschmitt comparaisondedeuxpopulationsdeladeuxiememoitieduvemillenaireavantnotreereapprocheanthropometrique
AT berangeresalibaserre comparaisondedeuxpopulationsdeladeuxiememoitieduvemillenaireavantnotreereapprocheanthropometrique
AT jeanlucgisclon comparaisondedeuxpopulationsdeladeuxiememoitieduvemillenaireavantnotreereapprocheanthropometrique
AT gillesloison comparaisondedeuxpopulationsdeladeuxiememoitieduvemillenaireavantnotreereapprocheanthropometrique