Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr
Field studies were conducted in 2010 and 2011 at the Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario and from 2009 to 2011 at the University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario to evaluate the sensitivity of four market classes of dry bean to sulfentrazone applied preemergence at 105, 140, and 28...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Agronomy |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/287908 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832565814720462848 |
|---|---|
| author | Nader Soltani Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema |
| author_facet | Nader Soltani Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema |
| author_sort | Nader Soltani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Field studies were conducted in 2010 and 2011 at the Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario and from 2009 to 2011 at the University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario to evaluate the sensitivity of four market classes of dry bean to sulfentrazone applied preemergence at 105, 140, and 280 g ai/ha alone and in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha. At 1 week after emergence (WAE), sulfentrazone alone or in combination with imazethapyr at all doses evaluated caused no significant visible injury in dry bean. At 2 WAE, sulfentrazone alone caused 1–11, 1–11, 1–5, and 3–19% visible injury, and sulfentrazone + imazethapyr caused 3–11, 2–10, 2–5, and 4–20% visible injury in black, cranberry, kidney, and white bean, respectively. At 4 WAE, sulfentrazone alone caused 1–7, 1–7, 0–4, and 1–16% visible injury and sulfentrazone + imazethapyr caused 1–8, 1–5, 1–3, and 2–14% visible injury in black, cranberry, kidney, and white bean, respectively. Sulfentrazone PRE caused slightly greater injury in black and white bean compared to cranberry and kidney bean. Generally, crop injury with sulfentrazone at rates up to 140 g ai/ha alone and in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha was minimal with no adverse effect on plant height, shoot dry weight, seed moisture content, and yield. Based on these results, there is potential for preemergence application of sulfentrazone at rates up to 140 g ai/ha alone or in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha in black, cranberry, kidney and white bean. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c71d7f2fcf26441380f78775dfa370e3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8159 1687-8167 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Agronomy |
| spelling | doaj-art-c71d7f2fcf26441380f78775dfa370e32025-02-03T01:06:44ZengWileyInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81591687-81672014-01-01201410.1155/2014/287908287908Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus ImazethapyrNader Soltani0Christy Shropshire1Peter H. Sikkema2University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaUniversity of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, N0P 2C0, CanadaField studies were conducted in 2010 and 2011 at the Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario and from 2009 to 2011 at the University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario to evaluate the sensitivity of four market classes of dry bean to sulfentrazone applied preemergence at 105, 140, and 280 g ai/ha alone and in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha. At 1 week after emergence (WAE), sulfentrazone alone or in combination with imazethapyr at all doses evaluated caused no significant visible injury in dry bean. At 2 WAE, sulfentrazone alone caused 1–11, 1–11, 1–5, and 3–19% visible injury, and sulfentrazone + imazethapyr caused 3–11, 2–10, 2–5, and 4–20% visible injury in black, cranberry, kidney, and white bean, respectively. At 4 WAE, sulfentrazone alone caused 1–7, 1–7, 0–4, and 1–16% visible injury and sulfentrazone + imazethapyr caused 1–8, 1–5, 1–3, and 2–14% visible injury in black, cranberry, kidney, and white bean, respectively. Sulfentrazone PRE caused slightly greater injury in black and white bean compared to cranberry and kidney bean. Generally, crop injury with sulfentrazone at rates up to 140 g ai/ha alone and in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha was minimal with no adverse effect on plant height, shoot dry weight, seed moisture content, and yield. Based on these results, there is potential for preemergence application of sulfentrazone at rates up to 140 g ai/ha alone or in combination with imazethapyr at 37.5 g ai/ha in black, cranberry, kidney and white bean.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/287908 |
| spellingShingle | Nader Soltani Christy Shropshire Peter H. Sikkema Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr International Journal of Agronomy |
| title | Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr |
| title_full | Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr |
| title_fullStr | Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr |
| title_short | Response of Dry Bean to Sulfentrazone Plus Imazethapyr |
| title_sort | response of dry bean to sulfentrazone plus imazethapyr |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/287908 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nadersoltani responseofdrybeantosulfentrazoneplusimazethapyr AT christyshropshire responseofdrybeantosulfentrazoneplusimazethapyr AT peterhsikkema responseofdrybeantosulfentrazoneplusimazethapyr |