The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, but the potential for hepatic toxicity is poorly understood. We performed a retrospective review of hepatic damage occurring in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving ruxolitinib. Relev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas Tremblay, Juan Putra, Alexander Vogel, Adam Winters, Ronald Hoffman, Thomas D. Schiano, Maria Isabel Fiel, John O. Mascarenhas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Hematology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3294046
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568314569687040
author Douglas Tremblay
Juan Putra
Alexander Vogel
Adam Winters
Ronald Hoffman
Thomas D. Schiano
Maria Isabel Fiel
John O. Mascarenhas
author_facet Douglas Tremblay
Juan Putra
Alexander Vogel
Adam Winters
Ronald Hoffman
Thomas D. Schiano
Maria Isabel Fiel
John O. Mascarenhas
author_sort Douglas Tremblay
collection DOAJ
description Ruxolitinib is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, but the potential for hepatic toxicity is poorly understood. We performed a retrospective review of hepatic damage occurring in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving ruxolitinib. Relevant histologic images of liver biopsies were reviewed by an experienced liver pathologist and reported to a multidisciplinary team including hepatology and hematology. A variety of liver pathology was observed including extramedullary hematopoiesis, obliterative portal venopathy, and drug-induced liver injury. In all cases reviewed, the liver biopsy had significant treatment implications. We conclude that hepatology referral and liver biopsy in patients receiving ruxolitinib therapy with biochemical evidence of liver injury reveals a variety of etiologies which have significant treatment impact. Clinicians should be aware of the potential causes of liver damage in this population and initiate prompt referral and liver biopsy.
format Article
id doaj-art-c681ce0f52e94a0cbc72ae54da44e755
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6560
2090-6579
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Hematology
spelling doaj-art-c681ce0f52e94a0cbc72ae54da44e7552025-02-03T00:59:17ZengWileyCase Reports in Hematology2090-65602090-65792019-01-01201910.1155/2019/32940463294046The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with RuxolitinibDouglas Tremblay0Juan Putra1Alexander Vogel2Adam Winters3Ronald Hoffman4Thomas D. Schiano5Maria Isabel Fiel6John O. Mascarenhas7Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USATisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Liver Diseases, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USADepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USATisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USARuxolitinib is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, but the potential for hepatic toxicity is poorly understood. We performed a retrospective review of hepatic damage occurring in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving ruxolitinib. Relevant histologic images of liver biopsies were reviewed by an experienced liver pathologist and reported to a multidisciplinary team including hepatology and hematology. A variety of liver pathology was observed including extramedullary hematopoiesis, obliterative portal venopathy, and drug-induced liver injury. In all cases reviewed, the liver biopsy had significant treatment implications. We conclude that hepatology referral and liver biopsy in patients receiving ruxolitinib therapy with biochemical evidence of liver injury reveals a variety of etiologies which have significant treatment impact. Clinicians should be aware of the potential causes of liver damage in this population and initiate prompt referral and liver biopsy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3294046
spellingShingle Douglas Tremblay
Juan Putra
Alexander Vogel
Adam Winters
Ronald Hoffman
Thomas D. Schiano
Maria Isabel Fiel
John O. Mascarenhas
The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
Case Reports in Hematology
title The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
title_full The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
title_fullStr The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
title_full_unstemmed The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
title_short The Implications of Liver Biopsy Results in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Being Treated with Ruxolitinib
title_sort implications of liver biopsy results in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms being treated with ruxolitinib
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3294046
work_keys_str_mv AT douglastremblay theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT juanputra theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT alexandervogel theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT adamwinters theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT ronaldhoffman theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT thomasdschiano theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT mariaisabelfiel theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT johnomascarenhas theimplicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT douglastremblay implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT juanputra implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT alexandervogel implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT adamwinters implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT ronaldhoffman implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT thomasdschiano implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT mariaisabelfiel implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib
AT johnomascarenhas implicationsofliverbiopsyresultsinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsbeingtreatedwithruxolitinib