Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China

Aims. We attempted to establish some guidelines for the selection of transmural stents during endoscopic drainage of PFCs by retrospective review of the clinical data obtained from three tertiary hospitals. Patients and Methods. Clinical data of 93 patients with attempted endoscopic drainage of symp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Lin, Xian-Bao Zhan, Si-Yu Sun, Xiu-Jiang Yang, Zhen-Dong Jin, Duo-Wu Zou, Zhao-Shen Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/193562
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548784393945088
author Hui Lin
Xian-Bao Zhan
Si-Yu Sun
Xiu-Jiang Yang
Zhen-Dong Jin
Duo-Wu Zou
Zhao-Shen Li
author_facet Hui Lin
Xian-Bao Zhan
Si-Yu Sun
Xiu-Jiang Yang
Zhen-Dong Jin
Duo-Wu Zou
Zhao-Shen Li
author_sort Hui Lin
collection DOAJ
description Aims. We attempted to establish some guidelines for the selection of transmural stents during endoscopic drainage of PFCs by retrospective review of the clinical data obtained from three tertiary hospitals. Patients and Methods. Clinical data of 93 patients with attempted endoscopic drainage of symptomatic PFCs were obtained through chart review and prospective follow-up. Results. Treatment success for acute pseudocyst (n=67), chronic pseudocyst (n=9), and WOPN (n=17) was 95.3%, 100%, and 88.2%, respectively (P=0.309). Clinical success for single-stent drainage was 93.9% (46/49) versus 97.4% (37/38) for multiple-stent drainage (P=0.799). Secondary infection for single-stent drainage was 18.4% (9/49) versus 5.3% (2/38) for multiple-stent drainage (P=0.134). Secondary infection for stent diameter less than or equal to 8.5 F was 3.4% (1/29) versus 17.2% (10/58) for stent diameter larger than or equal to 10 F (P=0.138). Conclusion. EUS-guided transmural drainage is an effective therapy for PFCs. Single-stent transmural drainage of PFCs is enough and does not seem to influence clinical success. The number or diameter of stents does not seem to be associated with secondary infection.
format Article
id doaj-art-c663b2b56b024223b5fc903286d0ebdb
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-c663b2b56b024223b5fc903286d0ebdb2025-02-03T06:13:08ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/193562193562Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in ChinaHui Lin0Xian-Bao Zhan1Si-Yu Sun2Xiu-Jiang Yang3Zhen-Dong Jin4Duo-Wu Zou5Zhao-Shen Li6Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Sheng Jing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, ChinaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, ChinaAims. We attempted to establish some guidelines for the selection of transmural stents during endoscopic drainage of PFCs by retrospective review of the clinical data obtained from three tertiary hospitals. Patients and Methods. Clinical data of 93 patients with attempted endoscopic drainage of symptomatic PFCs were obtained through chart review and prospective follow-up. Results. Treatment success for acute pseudocyst (n=67), chronic pseudocyst (n=9), and WOPN (n=17) was 95.3%, 100%, and 88.2%, respectively (P=0.309). Clinical success for single-stent drainage was 93.9% (46/49) versus 97.4% (37/38) for multiple-stent drainage (P=0.799). Secondary infection for single-stent drainage was 18.4% (9/49) versus 5.3% (2/38) for multiple-stent drainage (P=0.134). Secondary infection for stent diameter less than or equal to 8.5 F was 3.4% (1/29) versus 17.2% (10/58) for stent diameter larger than or equal to 10 F (P=0.138). Conclusion. EUS-guided transmural drainage is an effective therapy for PFCs. Single-stent transmural drainage of PFCs is enough and does not seem to influence clinical success. The number or diameter of stents does not seem to be associated with secondary infection.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/193562
spellingShingle Hui Lin
Xian-Bao Zhan
Si-Yu Sun
Xiu-Jiang Yang
Zhen-Dong Jin
Duo-Wu Zou
Zhao-Shen Li
Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
title_full Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
title_fullStr Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
title_full_unstemmed Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
title_short Stent Selection for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Multicenter Study in China
title_sort stent selection for endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections a multicenter study in china
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/193562
work_keys_str_mv AT huilin stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT xianbaozhan stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT siyusun stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT xiujiangyang stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT zhendongjin stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT duowuzou stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina
AT zhaoshenli stentselectionforendoscopicultrasoundguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollectionsamulticenterstudyinchina