The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing

Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhangin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiří Baláš, Michaela Panáčková, Barbora Strejcová, Andrew J. Martin, Darryl J. Cochrane, Miloš Kaláb, Jan Kodejška, Nick Draper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551214568439808
author Jiří Baláš
Michaela Panáčková
Barbora Strejcová
Andrew J. Martin
Darryl J. Cochrane
Miloš Kaláb
Jan Kodejška
Nick Draper
author_facet Jiří Baláš
Michaela Panáčková
Barbora Strejcová
Andrew J. Martin
Darryl J. Cochrane
Miloš Kaláb
Jan Kodejška
Nick Draper
author_sort Jiří Baláš
collection DOAJ
description Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhanging) inclination and speed 25 movements·min−1. A maximal test was undertaken on a similar circuit at the same speed with inclination increasing by 10° for each successive 3 min stage. Results. Mean oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) increased with wall inclination and climbers reached a mean (±SD) peak V˙O2 of 40.3 ± 3.5 mL·kg−1·min−1 during the maximal test. Self-reported climbing ability was negatively correlated with V˙O2 and HR during the submaximal test at 90° (V˙O2, r=−0.82; HR, and r=−0.66) and at 105° (V˙O2, r=−0.84; HR, and r=−0.78) suggesting an increased exercise economy for climbers with a higher ability level. Conclusion. Findings from this study indicate that there is a relationship between wall inclination and the physiological demand of a climb. However, the increased technical ability and fitness of higher level climbers appears to an extent to offset the increased demand through improved exercise economy which in turn leads to an increased time to exhaustion and an improvement in performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-c62791b769274befb3502046abfae2b2
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-c62791b769274befb3502046abfae2b22025-02-03T06:04:42ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/678387678387The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock ClimbingJiří Baláš0Michaela Panáčková1Barbora Strejcová2Andrew J. Martin3Darryl J. Cochrane4Miloš Kaláb5Jan Kodejška6Nick Draper7Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 16252 Prague, Czech RepublicFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 16252 Prague, Czech RepublicFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 16252 Prague, Czech RepublicSchool of Sport & Exercise, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandSchool of Sport & Exercise, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 16252 Prague, Czech RepublicFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, 16252 Prague, Czech RepublicSchool of Sport & Physical Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury 8140, New ZealandAim. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between submaximal and maximal physiological responses to rock climbing for climbers of differing abilities. Methods. Twenty-six male climbers performed a submaximal climbing test on a known circuit at 90° (vertical) and 105° (15° overhanging) inclination and speed 25 movements·min−1. A maximal test was undertaken on a similar circuit at the same speed with inclination increasing by 10° for each successive 3 min stage. Results. Mean oxygen consumption and heart rate (HR) increased with wall inclination and climbers reached a mean (±SD) peak V˙O2 of 40.3 ± 3.5 mL·kg−1·min−1 during the maximal test. Self-reported climbing ability was negatively correlated with V˙O2 and HR during the submaximal test at 90° (V˙O2, r=−0.82; HR, and r=−0.66) and at 105° (V˙O2, r=−0.84; HR, and r=−0.78) suggesting an increased exercise economy for climbers with a higher ability level. Conclusion. Findings from this study indicate that there is a relationship between wall inclination and the physiological demand of a climb. However, the increased technical ability and fitness of higher level climbers appears to an extent to offset the increased demand through improved exercise economy which in turn leads to an increased time to exhaustion and an improvement in performance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387
spellingShingle Jiří Baláš
Michaela Panáčková
Barbora Strejcová
Andrew J. Martin
Darryl J. Cochrane
Miloš Kaláb
Jan Kodejška
Nick Draper
The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
The Scientific World Journal
title The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_full The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_fullStr The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_short The Relationship between Climbing Ability and Physiological Responses to Rock Climbing
title_sort relationship between climbing ability and physiological responses to rock climbing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/678387
work_keys_str_mv AT jiribalas therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT michaelapanackova therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT barborastrejcova therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT andrewjmartin therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT darryljcochrane therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT miloskalab therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT jankodejska therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT nickdraper therelationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT jiribalas relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT michaelapanackova relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT barborastrejcova relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT andrewjmartin relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT darryljcochrane relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT miloskalab relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT jankodejska relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing
AT nickdraper relationshipbetweenclimbingabilityandphysiologicalresponsestorockclimbing