Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures

Hygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Young Lee, Lynn M. Hildemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563245747011584
author Jae Young Lee
Lynn M. Hildemann
author_facet Jae Young Lee
Lynn M. Hildemann
author_sort Jae Young Lee
collection DOAJ
description Hygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0.6% and 0.8% of the predictions using Peng’s modified UNIFAC model, respectively (except for the 10 mol/kg water value, which differed by 2%). However, for solutions containing mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids, malonic/succinic acids, and glutaric/succinic acids, the disagreements between the measurements and predictions using the ZSR model or Peng’s modified UNIFAC model are higher than those for the single-component cases. Measurements of the overall water vapor pressure for 50 : 50 molar mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids closely followed that for malonic acid alone. For mixtures of malonic/succinic acids and glutaric/succinic acids, the influence of a constant concentration of succinic acid on water uptake became more significant as the concentration of malonic acid or glutaric acid was increased.
format Article
id doaj-art-c5b32698df514c81a25ad31179400e02
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Meteorology
spelling doaj-art-c5b32698df514c81a25ad31179400e022025-02-03T01:20:45ZengWileyAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172013-01-01201310.1155/2013/897170897170Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol MixturesJae Young Lee0Lynn M. Hildemann1Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USACivil & Environmental Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USAHygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0.6% and 0.8% of the predictions using Peng’s modified UNIFAC model, respectively (except for the 10 mol/kg water value, which differed by 2%). However, for solutions containing mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids, malonic/succinic acids, and glutaric/succinic acids, the disagreements between the measurements and predictions using the ZSR model or Peng’s modified UNIFAC model are higher than those for the single-component cases. Measurements of the overall water vapor pressure for 50 : 50 molar mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids closely followed that for malonic acid alone. For mixtures of malonic/succinic acids and glutaric/succinic acids, the influence of a constant concentration of succinic acid on water uptake became more significant as the concentration of malonic acid or glutaric acid was increased.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170
spellingShingle Jae Young Lee
Lynn M. Hildemann
Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
Advances in Meteorology
title Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
title_full Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
title_fullStr Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
title_short Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
title_sort comparisons between hygroscopic measurements and unifac model predictions for dicarboxylic organic aerosol mixtures
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170
work_keys_str_mv AT jaeyounglee comparisonsbetweenhygroscopicmeasurementsandunifacmodelpredictionsfordicarboxylicorganicaerosolmixtures
AT lynnmhildemann comparisonsbetweenhygroscopicmeasurementsandunifacmodelpredictionsfordicarboxylicorganicaerosolmixtures