Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures
Hygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Meteorology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832563245747011584 |
---|---|
author | Jae Young Lee Lynn M. Hildemann |
author_facet | Jae Young Lee Lynn M. Hildemann |
author_sort | Jae Young Lee |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Hygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0.6% and 0.8% of the predictions using Peng’s modified UNIFAC model, respectively (except for the 10 mol/kg water value, which differed by 2%). However, for solutions containing mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids, malonic/succinic acids, and glutaric/succinic acids, the disagreements between the measurements and predictions using the ZSR model or Peng’s modified UNIFAC model are higher than those for the single-component cases. Measurements of the overall water vapor pressure for 50 : 50 molar mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids closely followed that for malonic acid alone. For mixtures of malonic/succinic acids and glutaric/succinic acids, the influence of a constant concentration of succinic acid on water uptake became more significant as the concentration of malonic acid or glutaric acid was increased. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-c5b32698df514c81a25ad31179400e02 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-9309 1687-9317 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Advances in Meteorology |
spelling | doaj-art-c5b32698df514c81a25ad31179400e022025-02-03T01:20:45ZengWileyAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172013-01-01201310.1155/2013/897170897170Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol MixturesJae Young Lee0Lynn M. Hildemann1Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USACivil & Environmental Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USAHygroscopic behavior was measured at 12°C over aqueous bulk solutions containing dicarboxylic acids, using a Baratron pressure transducer. Our experimental measurements of water activity for malonic acid solutions (0–10 mol/kg water) and glutaric acid solutions (0–5 mol/kg water) agreed to within 0.6% and 0.8% of the predictions using Peng’s modified UNIFAC model, respectively (except for the 10 mol/kg water value, which differed by 2%). However, for solutions containing mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids, malonic/succinic acids, and glutaric/succinic acids, the disagreements between the measurements and predictions using the ZSR model or Peng’s modified UNIFAC model are higher than those for the single-component cases. Measurements of the overall water vapor pressure for 50 : 50 molar mixtures of malonic/glutaric acids closely followed that for malonic acid alone. For mixtures of malonic/succinic acids and glutaric/succinic acids, the influence of a constant concentration of succinic acid on water uptake became more significant as the concentration of malonic acid or glutaric acid was increased.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170 |
spellingShingle | Jae Young Lee Lynn M. Hildemann Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures Advances in Meteorology |
title | Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures |
title_full | Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures |
title_fullStr | Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures |
title_short | Comparisons between Hygroscopic Measurements and UNIFAC Model Predictions for Dicarboxylic Organic Aerosol Mixtures |
title_sort | comparisons between hygroscopic measurements and unifac model predictions for dicarboxylic organic aerosol mixtures |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaeyounglee comparisonsbetweenhygroscopicmeasurementsandunifacmodelpredictionsfordicarboxylicorganicaerosolmixtures AT lynnmhildemann comparisonsbetweenhygroscopicmeasurementsandunifacmodelpredictionsfordicarboxylicorganicaerosolmixtures |