Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills
Highlights: - Assessing complex skills in secondary school teaching practice is considered challenging - We developed items (STAIRs) to formatively assess students’ social scientific reasoning - STAIRs were validated by experts, teachers, think-aloud interviews, and test administration - STAIRs...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Bielefeld University
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Social Science Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/7938 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849317627336327168 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Klijnstra Geerte Savenije Chiel Huijskes Carla van Boxtel |
| author_facet | Thomas Klijnstra Geerte Savenije Chiel Huijskes Carla van Boxtel |
| author_sort | Thomas Klijnstra |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Highlights:
- Assessing complex skills in secondary school teaching practice is considered challenging
- We developed items (STAIRs) to formatively assess students’ social scientific reasoning
- STAIRs were validated by experts, teachers, think-aloud interviews, and test administration
- STAIRs elicited students’ reasoning about social problems in three proficiency levels
- The design principles may be applied by teachers in the development of assessment items
Purpose: Assessing complex skills is considered important but challenging. This study focused on developing assessment items to evaluate secondary social science students’ proficiency in the subskill of causal analysis.
Design/methodology/approach: Based on a conceptual framework of social scientific reasoning, we designed formative assessment items known as STAIRs (Social science Teaching Assessment Items of Reasoning). The STAIRs were validated in three focus groups: two groups of assessment experts (N = 7 and N = 3) and one group of social science teachers (N = 10). Additionally, think-aloud interviews were conducted with eight social science students. The quality of the STAIRs was evaluated by administering the items to 338 social science students in 21 Dutch social science classes.
Findings: The results showed that it is possible to distinguish between the three performance levels in students’ reasoning using the STAIRs.
Practical implications: The design principles for the STAIRs may aid teachers in developing additional assessment items.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c5acf4cb9e004e1dbc6f1e062bf4df5e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1618-5293 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Bielefeld University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Social Science Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-c5acf4cb9e004e1dbc6f1e062bf4df5e2025-08-20T03:51:09ZdeuBielefeld UniversityJournal of Social Science Education1618-52932025-07-01242Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skillsThomas Klijnstra0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-6009Geerte Savenije1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-8771Chiel Huijskes2https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5526-1616Carla van Boxtel3University of AmsterdamUniversity of AmsterdamNational Institute for Educational MeasurementUniversity of AmsterdamHighlights: - Assessing complex skills in secondary school teaching practice is considered challenging - We developed items (STAIRs) to formatively assess students’ social scientific reasoning - STAIRs were validated by experts, teachers, think-aloud interviews, and test administration - STAIRs elicited students’ reasoning about social problems in three proficiency levels - The design principles may be applied by teachers in the development of assessment items Purpose: Assessing complex skills is considered important but challenging. This study focused on developing assessment items to evaluate secondary social science students’ proficiency in the subskill of causal analysis. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a conceptual framework of social scientific reasoning, we designed formative assessment items known as STAIRs (Social science Teaching Assessment Items of Reasoning). The STAIRs were validated in three focus groups: two groups of assessment experts (N = 7 and N = 3) and one group of social science teachers (N = 10). Additionally, think-aloud interviews were conducted with eight social science students. The quality of the STAIRs was evaluated by administering the items to 338 social science students in 21 Dutch social science classes. Findings: The results showed that it is possible to distinguish between the three performance levels in students’ reasoning using the STAIRs. Practical implications: The design principles for the STAIRs may aid teachers in developing additional assessment items. https://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/7938social science educationformative assessmentassessment designsocial scientific reasoningcausal analysiscivic education |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Klijnstra Geerte Savenije Chiel Huijskes Carla van Boxtel Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills Journal of Social Science Education social science education formative assessment assessment design social scientific reasoning causal analysis civic education |
| title | Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills |
| title_full | Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills |
| title_fullStr | Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills |
| title_full_unstemmed | Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills |
| title_short | Climbing the STAIRs: Assessing students’ social scientific reasoning skills |
| title_sort | climbing the stairs assessing students social scientific reasoning skills |
| topic | social science education formative assessment assessment design social scientific reasoning causal analysis civic education |
| url | https://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/7938 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasklijnstra climbingthestairsassessingstudentssocialscientificreasoningskills AT geertesavenije climbingthestairsassessingstudentssocialscientificreasoningskills AT chielhuijskes climbingthestairsassessingstudentssocialscientificreasoningskills AT carlavanboxtel climbingthestairsassessingstudentssocialscientificreasoningskills |