LENIENCY POLICY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE INSTITUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
According to the Order of the Competition Council. 300/2009, individual denunciation of participation in anticompetitive agreements eliminate the contravention liability imposed by the provisions of Law no. 21/1996, or reduce the fine imposed, if the conditions to qualify for leniency, contained in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | MIHAELA MUSAN, NAOMI RENIUT-URSOIU |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
2011-04-01
|
| Series: | Challenges of the Knowledge Society |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2011_articles/index.php?dir=01_law%2F&download=cks_2011_law_art_059.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
DIMENSIONS OF LENIENCY POLICIES IN BRICS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIA, SOUTH AFRICA, BRAZIL AND RUSSIA
by: D. Sharma
Published: (2016-09-01) -
IMMUNITY AND LENIENCY POLICY IN COMPETITION CASES
by: Ana-Maria UDRISTE, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01) -
Leniency programme and liability for damage caused by competition law infringements
by: Rakić Ivana
Published: (2014-01-01) -
DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE IN CARTEL LITIGATIONS IN THE EU: IS BALANCE OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS AND PUBLIC INTERESTS POSSIBLE?
by: N. Mosunova
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Norwegian Cartels: Law, Policy, Registration and Practice under the Price and Competition Act between 1954 and 1993
by: Frode Steen, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)