Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services

Abstract Background Obesity is a multi-faceted problem that requires complex health system responses. While no single program or service is sufficient to meet every individual’s needs, some criteria that increase the likelihood of program/service quality delivery to produce effective outcomes exist....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Thomas, Suzanne Robinson, Sharyn Burns, Helen Mitchell, Andrea Begley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01263-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585314559852544
author Laura Thomas
Suzanne Robinson
Sharyn Burns
Helen Mitchell
Andrea Begley
author_facet Laura Thomas
Suzanne Robinson
Sharyn Burns
Helen Mitchell
Andrea Begley
author_sort Laura Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Obesity is a multi-faceted problem that requires complex health system responses. While no single program or service is sufficient to meet every individual’s needs, some criteria that increase the likelihood of program/service quality delivery to produce effective outcomes exist. However, although research on health commissioning is available internationally and is growing within the Australian context, no evidence exists of a multi-criteria decision-making framework to address the complexity required for effective commissioning of overweight and obesity early intervention and weight management programs or services. This study aimed to develop a set of criteria to support effective commissioning in this context. Methods A mixed-methods co-design approach was used to develop a multi-criteria framework. A literature review informed a three-stage co-design consensus-gathering approach. Participants included Western Australian stakeholders from the Western Australian health system, services and consumers, who reviewed, ranked and validated responses and criteria through ongoing discussions. A deliberative forum was held between the two online, modified Delphi surveys to reach a consensus among stakeholders. Results Through the co-design, a total of 63 stakeholders were identified: 24 completed the round 1 Delphi survey assessing 22 proposed criteria, 40 attended the deliberative forum and 30 completed the round 2 Delphi survey. A total of 4 themes arose from the co-design process: (1) reduce duplication, (2) demote criteria, (3) re-organize criteria and (4) simplify language, and 10 criteria were established: safety, collaboration and consultation, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, evidence-based, health service delivery model, sustainability and workforce capacity and competence. The criteria were underpinned by indicators highlighting relevant sub-themes. Conclusions A multi-criteria framework was developed and its application to the commissioning process will enable the selection of programs and services that will likely have an impact on individuals’ use of and satisfaction with programs and services, overweight and obesity-related outcomes and inter-agency collaborations to maximize economic and workforce resources.
format Article
id doaj-art-c492823d58c24cc39e4ca8b5b975cd3a
institution Kabale University
issn 1478-4505
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health Research Policy and Systems
spelling doaj-art-c492823d58c24cc39e4ca8b5b975cd3a2025-01-26T12:58:11ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052025-01-0123111310.1186/s12961-024-01263-yEngaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and servicesLaura Thomas0Suzanne Robinson1Sharyn Burns2Helen Mitchell3Andrea Begley4School of Population Health, Curtin UniversitySchool of Population Health, Curtin UniversitySchool of Population Health, Curtin UniversityHope Community ServicesSchool of Population Health, Curtin UniversityAbstract Background Obesity is a multi-faceted problem that requires complex health system responses. While no single program or service is sufficient to meet every individual’s needs, some criteria that increase the likelihood of program/service quality delivery to produce effective outcomes exist. However, although research on health commissioning is available internationally and is growing within the Australian context, no evidence exists of a multi-criteria decision-making framework to address the complexity required for effective commissioning of overweight and obesity early intervention and weight management programs or services. This study aimed to develop a set of criteria to support effective commissioning in this context. Methods A mixed-methods co-design approach was used to develop a multi-criteria framework. A literature review informed a three-stage co-design consensus-gathering approach. Participants included Western Australian stakeholders from the Western Australian health system, services and consumers, who reviewed, ranked and validated responses and criteria through ongoing discussions. A deliberative forum was held between the two online, modified Delphi surveys to reach a consensus among stakeholders. Results Through the co-design, a total of 63 stakeholders were identified: 24 completed the round 1 Delphi survey assessing 22 proposed criteria, 40 attended the deliberative forum and 30 completed the round 2 Delphi survey. A total of 4 themes arose from the co-design process: (1) reduce duplication, (2) demote criteria, (3) re-organize criteria and (4) simplify language, and 10 criteria were established: safety, collaboration and consultation, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, evidence-based, health service delivery model, sustainability and workforce capacity and competence. The criteria were underpinned by indicators highlighting relevant sub-themes. Conclusions A multi-criteria framework was developed and its application to the commissioning process will enable the selection of programs and services that will likely have an impact on individuals’ use of and satisfaction with programs and services, overweight and obesity-related outcomes and inter-agency collaborations to maximize economic and workforce resources.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01263-yCommissioningMixed-methods researchObesityCo-designHealthy weightOverweight
spellingShingle Laura Thomas
Suzanne Robinson
Sharyn Burns
Helen Mitchell
Andrea Begley
Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
Health Research Policy and Systems
Commissioning
Mixed-methods research
Obesity
Co-design
Healthy weight
Overweight
title Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
title_full Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
title_fullStr Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
title_full_unstemmed Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
title_short Engaging health system, service and consumer representatives in the co-design of a multi-criteria decision-making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
title_sort engaging health system service and consumer representatives in the co design of a multi criteria decision making framework for commissioning overweight and obesity programs and services
topic Commissioning
Mixed-methods research
Obesity
Co-design
Healthy weight
Overweight
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01263-y
work_keys_str_mv AT laurathomas engaginghealthsystemserviceandconsumerrepresentativesinthecodesignofamulticriteriadecisionmakingframeworkforcommissioningoverweightandobesityprogramsandservices
AT suzannerobinson engaginghealthsystemserviceandconsumerrepresentativesinthecodesignofamulticriteriadecisionmakingframeworkforcommissioningoverweightandobesityprogramsandservices
AT sharynburns engaginghealthsystemserviceandconsumerrepresentativesinthecodesignofamulticriteriadecisionmakingframeworkforcommissioningoverweightandobesityprogramsandservices
AT helenmitchell engaginghealthsystemserviceandconsumerrepresentativesinthecodesignofamulticriteriadecisionmakingframeworkforcommissioningoverweightandobesityprogramsandservices
AT andreabegley engaginghealthsystemserviceandconsumerrepresentativesinthecodesignofamulticriteriadecisionmakingframeworkforcommissioningoverweightandobesityprogramsandservices